Document

DEF 14A 1 a2020proxystatement.htm DEF 14A Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o


Check the appropriate box:
o			Preliminary Proxy Statement
o			Confidential, For Use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a- 6(e)(2))
þ			Definitive Proxy Statement
o			Definitive Additional Materials
o			Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-2

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ	No fee required.
o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

	2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

	3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

	4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

	5)	Total Fee Paid:


o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	1)	Amount Previously Paid:

	2)	Form, Schedule, or Registration Statement No.:

	3)	Filing Party:

	4)	Date Filed:

NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

WHEN À

WHERE

WHO CAN VOTE

RECORD DATE

Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. PDT

Service Center 29222 Rancho Viejo Rd Suite 127 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675

Owners of Ensign's issued and

outstanding common stock as of the

close of business on the record date.

April 1, 2021

Items of Business

Board Recommendation

Election of two nominees named in the proxy statement to serve on Ensign's Board of Directors

FOR each director nominee

›

See pg 3

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2021

FOR

›

See pg 15

Advisory approval of the Company's named executive officer compensation

FOR

›

See pg 31

We will also address any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement. Following the formal meeting, management intends to discuss on our developments of the past year and respond to questions of general interest to shareholders.

We intend to hold our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person, subject to applicable occupancy restrictions. We are actively monitoring the public health and travel concerns of our stockholders and employees in light of COVID-19 (Coronavirus), as well as the related protocols that federal, state and local governments may impose. As part of our precautions, we are considering the possibility of changing the location of the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or holding a virtual meeting by means of remote communication. We will announce in a current report on Form 8-K any alternative arrangements for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders as promptly as practicable.

How To Vote

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Ensign’s Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) and 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2020 Form 10-K”) are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Your vote is important. Please vote as soon as possible by one of the methods shown below. Be sure to have your proxy card, voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in hand and follow the below instructions:

By Internet

You can vote your shares online at www.proxyvote.com

By Phone

(

You can vote your shares by calling 800-690-6903

By Mail

Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card or voting instruction form in the postage-paid envelope provided

Date of Mailing

April 16, 2021

Our intended date to mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), we have elected to furnish our proxy materials to shareholders by providing access to the materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice) has been mailed to the majority of our shareholders, while other shareholders have instead received paper copies of the documents accessible on the Internet. It is important that your shares be represented and voted whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person. If you are the registered holder of your shares and are viewing the Proxy Statement on the Internet, you may grant your proxy electronically via the Internet by following the instructions on the Notice previously mailed to you and the instructions listed on the Internet site. If you are receiving a paper copy of the proxy statement, you may vote by completing and mailing the proxy card enclosed with the Proxy Statement, or you may grant your proxy electronically via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card. If your shares are held in “street name,” which means that your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you should review the Notice used by that firm to determine whether and how you will be able to submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet. Submitting a proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card will ensure your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting.

THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BARRY R. PORT

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

San Juan Capistrano, California

Dated: April 16, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Proxy Statement																											1

COVID-19 Respo nse																											2

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE																											3
Proposal 1: Election Of Directors																											3
Nominees and Directors																											4
Board Structure and Practices																											6
Director Compensation																											12
Sustainability																											13



AUDIT MATTERS																											15
Proposal 2: Approval of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm																											15
Audit Committee Report																											16

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS																											17
Executive Officers																											22
Pay Ratio Disclosure																											23
Compensation Committee Report																											25
Executive Compensation																											26
Equity Compensation Plan Information																											30
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation																											31

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION																											32
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management																											32
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports																											32
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions																											33

OTHER MATTERS																											34
Shareholder Proposals																											34

Available Information																											35

PROXY STATEMENT

We are pleased to take advantage of SEC rules that allow companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we sent to the majority of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or "Notice" regarding the Internet availability of the proxy materials. Other shareholders were instead sent paper copies of the proxy materials accessible on the Internet if the preference to receive a paper copy was requested. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy can be found on the Notice. In addition, shareholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis by going to www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions. A shareholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the shareholder elects otherwise.

The enclosed Proxy Statement is solicited by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of The Ensign Group, Inc., ("Ensign") a Delaware corporation, for use at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Our principal executive offices are located at 29222 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 127, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675. This proxy statement is first being made available to shareholders on or about April 16, 2021. When used in this Proxy Statement, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer to The Ensign Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries; however, The Ensign Group, Inc. is a holding company and each of the affiliated operations and operating subsidiaries referenced herein is operated by a separate, wholly-owned independent operating subsidiary that has its own management, employees and assets. The use of “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words in this Proxy Statement is not meant to imply that any or all of these operations are operated by the same entity or that The Ensign Group, Inc. operates any of the businesses conducted by its subsidiaries.

The expenses of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing the Notice, this Proxy Statement and the materials used in the solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. Proxies will be solicited through the Internet and the mail. Our directors, officers, and other employees, without additional compensation, may also solicit proxies personally or in writing, by telephone, e-mail, or otherwise. We do not anticipate paying any compensation to any other party for the solicitation of proxies, but may reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners.

Any shareholder who executes and delivers a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by delivering to the Secretary of the Company an instrument revoking it or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Subject to revocation, the proxy holders will vote all shares represented by a properly executed proxy received in time for the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy. If no instruction is specified with respect to a matter to be acted upon, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board.

Voting Securities and Vote Required

Holders of record of Ensign's Common Stock at the close of business on April 1, 2021 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On that date, 54,953,285 shares of the Company's common stock were issued and outstanding. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on every matter submitted to the shareholders at the Annual Meeting. In order to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting, a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be represented, either in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting. Under Delaware law, shares represented at the Annual Meeting by proxies that reflect abstentions or broker non-votes will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a bank, broker or other holder of record holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because that holder does not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

Proposal 1: Election of the Class II director nominees will require the affirmative approval of a majority of the votes cast with respect to each director's election. A majority of votes cast with respect to a director's election meant that the number of votes cast "FOR" a director's election exceeds the number of votes cast "AGAINST" that director's election, with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as a vote cast either "FOR" or "AGAINST" that director's election. Unless instructed to the contrary, the shares represented by proxies will be voted FOR the election of the Class II director nominees.

Proposals 2 and 3: The proposals referenced will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. In determining whether each proposal has received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as shares entitled to vote and will have the same effect as votes against the proposals. Properly executed, unrevoked proxies will be voted FOR Proposals 2 and 3 unless a vote against such proposals or abstention is specifically indicated in the proxy.

Your vote is very important. Accordingly, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you should vote by using one of the methods described in the Notice. You may vote your shares at the Annual Meeting by attending and voting in person, by voting via the Internet or by telephone as described in the Notice, or by having your shares represented at the Annual Meeting by a valid proxy.

1 Ensign Group

If your shares are not registered directly in your name (e.g. you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or through a bank or other holder of record), you may vote by following the instructions detailed on the notice or voting instruction form you receive from your broker or other nominee. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “shareholder of record.” In that case, either the Notice or the Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and our 2020 Form 10-K have been sent directly to you.

Please note that you cannot vote your shares by filling out and returning the Notice. The Notice does, however, include instructions on how to vote your shares.


COVID-19 RESPONSE

Our primary focus throughout the COVID-19 pandemic has remained ensuring the health and safety of our patients, residents, employees, and their respective families. We continue to implement measures necessary to provide the safest possible environment within our sites of service, taking into consideration the vulnerable nature of our patients and the unique exposure risks of our staff. The CDC has stated that older adults, such as our patients, are at a higher risk for serious illness and death from COVID-19 due to the higher prevalence of chronic medical conditions. In addition, our employees are at higher risk of contracting or spreading the disease when caring for patients due to the nature of the work environment. Consistent with CDC guidelines and recommendations applicable to nursing facilities, we implemented new infection control policies and practices to prevent the introduction of COVID-19 into our facilities and to control the spread of COVID-19 within communities. These changing guidelines include visitor policies, screening and testing employees and others permitted to enter the building, restricted communal dining and reducing or restricting activities programming and optional therapies. Upon confirmation of a positive COVID-19 exposure at a facility, we follow CDC and local healthcare guidance to minimize further exposure, which could include implementing personal protection protocols, restricting new admissions and cohorting and isolating patients. Due to the vulnerable nature of our patients, we continue to adhere to CDC infection prevention guidelines at our facilities, even as federal, state, and local stay-at-home and social distancing orders and recommendations have relaxed.

Vaccine distribution to all 50 states began in December 2020. The CDC recommended that the initial phase of the COVID-19 vaccination program prioritize administration to healthcare personnel and residents of long-term care facilities, with states having the ultimate authority to decide who will receive the vaccine. As the vaccines became available, including through the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care Program, our residents and staff were able to begin receiving vaccinations, and we anticipate continued participation in COVID-19 vaccination programs.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirvus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law to respond to COVID-19 outbreak and its impact on the economy, public health, state and local government, individuals and businesses. The CARES Act also authorized the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to distribute relief fund (Provider Relief Fund) grants to healthcare providers “to support healthcare-related expenses or lost revenue attributable to COVID-19”. We have received numerous rounds of automatic distributions to providers based upon a variety of factors. During 2020, we received approximately $141.7 million in relief distributions from Provider Relief Funds, and, like other well-capitalized healthcare providers, we have returned all of the Provider Relief Funding received. When we consider our healthy balance sheet and liquidity, which is a result of our financial performance, we believe we are able to service our residents without the Provider Relief Funds. Therefore, our clinical and financial results and our executive bonus compensation under the Executive Compensation Plan do not include any benefit related to the Provider Relief Funds.

To help states meet the need for increased health services and to handle increased Medicaid enrollment, the Family First Coronavirus Response Act provides a 6.2% increase to Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP). The Act permits states to retroactively increase the Medicaid rates to January 1, 2020. Depending on the state, FMAP funding will terminate, either when the national emergency status is lifted, the end of the quarter when the national emergency status is lifted, or sometime between. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $45.4 million of state funding reimbursement relief, which was used to offset COVID-19 related expenses. At the direction of management, the Compensation Committee of the Board excluded the revenue amount of $45.4 million in FMAP funds from the 2020 Executive Compensation Plan bonus pool distribution. In addition, and also at the direction of management, the Compensation Committee and the board included all COVID-19 specific expenses thereby reducing the 2020 bonus pool distribution under the Executive Compensation Plan. As such, our executive bonus compensation under the Executive Compensation Plan for 2020 fiscal year does not include any FMAP funding and did reflect increased expenses related to COVID-19.

Our employees nationwide have been on the front lines in the battle against COVID-19. When it would have been easier to simply hunker down and wait for the challenges to pass, the heroes in our operations continued to provide selfless service to all their patients, including COVID patients. To recognize these front-line workers, our company established a front-line fund to provide extraordinary financial awards to our employees for their tirelessly daily efforts to provide outstanding care to each resident they serve. Specifically, special purpose front-line funds were paid only to our caregivers and other front-line teams. The front-line special purpose bonus pool was funded from the reduction in the bonus pools of the Executive Compensation Plan by approximately 30% and our general fiscal year-end bonus pool by approximately 22%, respectively. In addition, each individual operating subsidiary provided bonus to front-line employees. We are beyond grateful for their enormous efforts and will continue to recognize the sacrifices of these employees as we navigate through the pandemic.

2 Ensign Group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We are committed to continually enhancing our strong corporate governance practices, which we believe helps us sustain our success and build long-term value for our shareholders. Our Board sets high standards for our employees, officers and directors. Implicit in this philosophy is the importance of sound corporate governance. It is the duty of the Board to serve as a prudent fiduciary for shareholders and to oversee the management of the Company's business. Our governance structure enables independent, experienced and accomplished directors to provide advice, insight, guidance and oversight to advance the interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (our "Certificate of Incorporation") provides for a classified Board of Directors consisting of three classes of directors, each serving staggered three-year terms and each class as nearly equal in number as possible as determined by our Board. As a result, a portion of our Board will be elected each year.

Proposal 1:

Election of Directors

Recommendation of the Board:

FOR each director nominee

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board, including its independent directors, selected and approved Mr. Christopher R. Christensen and Mr. Daren J. Shaw as nominees for election as Class II directors, the class being elected at the Annual Meeting. Each nominee is to serve for a term of three years, expiring at the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders or until his successor is duly appointed or elected and qualified or until his earlier death, resignation or removal. We are not aware of any arrangements or understandings between the director nominees and any other person pursuant to which such persons were selected as a director nominee.

Messrs. Christopher R. Christensen and Daren J. Shaw currently serve as members of our Board, and have agreed to serve if elected. In the event the nominees named herein are unable to serve or decline to serve at the time of the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will exercise discretionary authority to vote for substitutes. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them FOR the nominees. This proxy cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than two.

Committee Membership

Name

Age

Director Since

Board of Directors

Audit Committee

Quality Assurance and Compliance

Nominating and Corporate Governance

Compensation

Christopher R. Christensen

1999

Daren J. Shaw

2012

Chair

Background information regarding the nominees and all other directors as of March 31, 2021, including some of the attributes that led to their selection, appears below. In addition, the Board firmly believes that the experience, attributes, and skills of any single director nominee should not be viewed in isolation, but rather in the context of the experience, attributes, and skills that all director nominees bring to the Board as a whole, each of which contributes to the function of an effective Board.

Determinations Regarding Director and Nominee Independence

The Company's common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The NASDAQ Listing Rules require that a majority of the members of a listed company’s board of directors qualify as “independent”. After review of all of the relevant transactions or relationships between each director (and his or her family members) and us, our senior management and our independent registered public accounting firm, our Board has affirmatively determined that each of Dr. Ann S. Blouin, Ms. Swati B. Abbott, and Messrs. Daren J. Shaw, Lee A. Daniels and Barry M. Smith are "independent" within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules.

Further, each member of our Board serving on our Audit Committee, Compensation and Nominating Committee and Corporate Governance Committee is “independent” within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules and, as applicable, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended the Exchange Act.

3 Ensign Group

NOMINEES AND DIRECTORS

The following biographical information sets forth certain information with respect to the nominees for election as well as the continuing directors whose terms expire at the annual meeting of shareholders in 2022 and 2023. The information is current as of March 31, 2021. The information presented below for each director includes the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led us to the conclusion that such director should be nominated to serve on our Board in light of our business.

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors

Christopher R. Christensen

AGE

DIRECTOR SINCE

COMMITTEES

Co-founder, Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board

Formation in 1999

Quality Assurance and Compliance

Experience

Mr. Christensen has served as our President since 1999 and Chief Executive Officer since April 2006. On May 30, 2019, Mr. Christensen began serving as our Executive Chairman and the Chairman of the Board. Mr. Christensen has served as a member of our Board since the formation of the Company in 1999, has overseen the company and its growth since its inception. Prior to the formation of Ensign, Mr. Christensen served as acting Chief Operating Officer of Covenant Care, Inc., a California-based provider of long-term care. As a cofounder of CareTrust REIT, Inc., which spun-out of Ensign in 2014, Mr. Christensen served as a director from June 2014 to April 2015. Also, as cofounder of The Pennant Group, Inc., which spun-out of Ensign in 2019, Mr. Christensen has served and continues to serve as a director. We believe that Mr. Christensen’s important role in the history and management of our company and its affiliates and his leadership and business skills, support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors. Mr. Christensen is the son of our Chairman Emeritus, Mr. Roy E. Christensen.

Daren J. Shaw

AGE

DIRECTOR SINCE

COMMITTEES

Director

2012

Audit (Chair), Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance

Experience

Mr. Shaw has served as a member of our Board since March 2012. Mr. Shaw has served for more than 34 years in leadership capacities with several financial services firms. In 2019, he retired as a Managing Director of the Investment Banking Group at D.A. Davidson & Co., a middle-market full-service investment banking firm. While at D.A. Davidson & Co., Mr. Shaw served on the Senior Management Committee and board of directors and served as the lead investment banker in a wide variety of transactions, including public stock offerings, private placements, and mergers and acquisitions. Previously, Mr. Shaw served for 12 years with Pacific Crest Securities, in various roles, including Managing Director. Mr. Shaw also serves as a member of the board of directors of Profire Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: PFIE), and on the investment committee of Tingey Investment Advisors, a registered investment advisory firm. Mr. Shaw's previous leadership positions at numerous investment banking firms provides him with valuable financial understanding, and supports his role as Chair of our Audit Committee. We believe that Mr. Shaw’s extensive experience and leadership in the financial services industry supports the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

Continuing Members of the Board of Directors

Class III Directors with Terms Ending at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Barry R. Port

AGE

DIRECTOR SINCE

COMMITTEES

Chief Executive Officer and Director

2019

Quality Assurance and Compliance

Experience

Mr. Port has served as our Chief Executive Officer since May 2019. He has concurrently served as a member of our Board since May 2019. From January 2012 to May 2019, Mr. Port served as the Chief Operating Officer of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ensign Services, Inc., which provides consulting and management services to our skilled nursing and senior living operations. He previously served as the President of our subsidiary, Keystone Care, Inc., which supervised the operations of facilities in Texas, from March 2006 to December 2011. Prior to 2006, he served as the Chief Executive Officer at our Bella Vita Health and Rehabilitation Center (formerly Desert Sky Health and Rehabilitation Center), a skilled nursing and assisted living campus in Glendale, Arizona from March 2004 to March 2006. Mr. Port holds a Bachelor's Degree from Brigham Young University in Exercise Physiology, a Master's Degree in Business Administration and a Master's Degree in Health Administration both from the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University. We believe that Mr. Port's important role in the management of our company and its affiliates and his leadership and business skills, support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

4 Ensign Group

Lee A. Daniels

AGE

DIRECTOR SINCE

COMMITTEES

Director

2013

Audit and Compensation (Chair)

Experience

Mr. Daniels has served as a member of our Board since June of 2013. Mr. Daniels is currently a professor of International Business and Marketing at the Marriott School of Management at Brigham Young University (BYU) where he has been teaching since 2004. Prior to joining the faculty at BYU, Mr. Daniels spent 25 years working in international business in more than 30 countries. Most recently, Mr. Daniels served as the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Partner of Daniels Capital, LLC, an investment company that made real estate investments. He was also President of Newbridge Capital, Japan, one of the largest private equity funds in Asia, from 2001 to 2004, President and Representative Director of Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd., the largest cable TV, internet and telephone company in Japan; and Chief Executive Officer of Titus Communications from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Daniels spent the majority of his career at AT&T, where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Japan Ltd. from 1994 to 1998 and concurrently served as the Chairman of JENS, one of the first internet service providers in Japan. Mr. Daniels has also served on numerous board of directors in Japan and the United States, including Raser Technologies, Inc., The US Travel Industry Association and Novarad. He was also Chairman of the Board of the American International School in Japan from 1999 to 2004. Mr. Daniels earned a B.S. degree in Business Management from BYU, a Master’s Degree in International Business from Sophia University in Japan and completed the Executive Development Program at the J.L. Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. We believe that Mr. Daniels’ extensive management and board experience and his proven leadership and business capabilities support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

Ann S. Blouin, PhD, RN

AGE

DIRECTOR SINCE

COMMITTEES

Director

2018

Quality Assurance and Compliance (chair), and Nominating & Corporate Governance

Experience

Dr. Blouin has served as a member of our Board since November 2018. Dr. Blouin retired from her position as Executive Vice President of Customer Relations and previous position as Executive Vice President of Accreditation and Certification Operations at The Joint Commission where she provided leadership in aligning the strategic and operating goals of the organization with its client base. The Joint Commission has accreditation and certification programs across the care continuum, including long-term care. With more than 30 years of health care administration, consulting and clinical nursing experience, Dr. Blouin has held key senior leadership positions at community teaching hospitals and academic medical centers. While serving in key leadership roles with the consulting firms of Deloitte LLP, Ernst & Young Global Limited, Cap Gemini SE and Huron Consulting Group, she worked with multiple health systems across the United States and Canada to help them improve operating cost efficiency and effectiveness, revenue management, care coordination, and quality and patient safety. Dr. Blouin is currently serving as President of PSQ Advisory, working with boards and senior leadership to deliver strategic guidance on patient care quality and safety for America's health systems. In addition, Dr. Blouin also serves on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Board of Directors and as an editorial advisor for the Journal of Nursing Administration. Dr. Blouin is an Assistant Professor at Loyola University of Chicago. Dr. Blouin earned her Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Nursing Sciences and Master in Business Administration (MBA) from the University of Illinois at Chicago. Dr. Blouin received her Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) from Loyola University of Chicago, and Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) from Lewis University in Romeoville, Illinois. We believe that Dr. Blouin’s extensive experience and leadership supports the conclusion that she should serve as one of our directors.

Class I Directors with Terms Ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Roy E. Christensen

AGE

DIRECTOR SINCE

Co-founder and Chairman Emeritus

1999

Experience

Mr. Christensen has served as our Chairman of the Board since 1999. On May 30, 2019, Mr. Christensen began serving as our Chairman Emeritus. He served as our Chief Executive Officer from 1999 to April 2006. He is a 59-year veteran of the long-term care industry and was founder and Chairman of both Beverly Enterprises, Inc., a healthcare company, and GranCare, Inc. (which later merged into Mariner Post-Acute Network, Inc.) a healthcare company. In 1994, he founded Covenant Care, Inc., a long-term care company, and served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1994 to 1997. He was Chairman of GranCare, Inc. from 1988 to 1993, and Chief Executive Officer of GranCare, Inc. from 1988 to 1991. He was a member of President Nixon’s Healthcare Advisory Task Force on Medicare and Medicaid, and spent four years as a member of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare’s Advisory Task Force during the Nixon administration. We believe that Mr. Christensen’s extensive experience in the skilled nursing industry and his proven leadership and business skills support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors. Mr. Christensen is the father of our Chairman of the Board, Christopher R. Christensen.

5 Ensign Group

Barry M. Smith

AGE

DIRECTOR SINCE

COMMITTEES

Director

2014

Quality Assurance & Compliance, Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair)

Experience

Mr. Smith has served as a member of our Board since 2014. He most recently served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Magellan Health, Inc., the nation’s largest provider of behavioral health services and a leading national provider of radiology benefit management services, specialty pharmacy and prescription benefit management services, since 2013. He retired from Magellan at the end of 2019. He founded and served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of VistaCare, Inc., a national provider of hospice services, from 1996 to 2002, and he served as Chairman of VistaCare in 2003. From 1990 through 1995, Mr. Smith served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Value Rx, Inc., which was then one of the country’s largest pharmacy benefit management companies and, prior to that, served as vice president of operations for PCS Health Systems, also a pharmacy benefit management firm. We believe Mr. Smith’s extensive experience as a proven and experienced leader in numerous healthcare businesses that are closely related to our businesses and his valuable strategic and other management insights support the conclusion that he should serve as one of our directors.

Swati B. Abbott

AGE

DIRECTOR SINCE

COMMITTEES

Director

2020

Audit Committee and Quality Assurance & Compliance

Experience

Ms. Abbott has served as a member of our Board since January 2020. Ms. Abbott currently serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Health Intelligence Company LLC, doing business as Blue Health Intelligence, a healthcare data and analytics company, a position that she has held since 2011. Prior to joining Blue Health Intelligence, Ms. Abbott served as the president of MEDai, Inc., an industry leader in predictive analytics, prior to its acquisition by Reed Elsevier in 2008. She also served as Managing Director for the Medical Management Strategic Business Unit at ViPS. She currently serves as a director of Prognos, Inc., a private healthcare data analytics company, and Magellan Health Inc. (NASDAQ: MGLN), a for-profit managed health care company, focused on special populations, complete pharmacy benefits and other specialty areas of healthcare. We believe that Ms. Abbott's extensive experience and leadership in the healthcare services industry supports the conclusion that she should serve as one of our directors.

BOARD STRUCTURE AND PRACTICES

Our Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board, Christopher R. Christensen, is one of the Company's founders and is the former Chief Executive Officer. The role of the Chairman of the Board is to provide governance and leadership to the Board, including helping to organize the Board's work and ensuring that its members have accurate and timely information to effectively carry out their responsibilities.

The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company to make that determination based upon the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. The Board has determined that not having the Company's Chief Executive Officer also serve as Chairman of the Board is in the best interest of the Company's shareholders at this time. However, the Board has determined that having the Company's former Chief Executive Officer serve as the Chairman of the Board is in the best interest of the Company shareholders because of the former Chief Executive Officer's extensive knowledge of the Company and its industry, and serves to foster greater communication between the Company's management and the Board.

6 Ensign Group

Below are some highlights of our corporate governance practices:

Board Structure and Practices

Board's Role in Risk Oversight

Each of our Board members is elected at least every three years.

Our Board actively oversees the Company's risk and enterprise-wide risk management process in a way that balances managing risks while enhancing the long-term value of the Company for the benefit of the shareholders.

We have majority voting for our director elections.

Five of our Board members are independent, in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rules and our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Our Board focuses on effective risk oversight to set the Company's tone and culture towards effective risk management by developing and establishing a mutual understanding with management of the Company's risk philosophy and overall appetite for risk.

We have adopted a process to enable shareholders to nominate directors in accordance with our Bylaws.

Our Board is actively involved with management assessment of existing risk management processes and how management identifies, assesses and manages the Company's most significant risk exposures. Our Board expects frequent updates from management about the Company's most significant risks so as to enable it to evaluate whether management is responding appropriately.

Our independent directors meet frequently in executive session.

Our Board is actively engaged in managing talent and long-term succession planning for executives.

Our Board relies on each of its sub-committees (the "Board Committees") to help oversee the risk management responsibilities relating to the functions performed by such Board Committees. Each of the Board Committees are required to make regular reports of its actions and communicate any recommendations to the Board, including recommendations to assist the Board with its overall risk oversight function.

†Our Audit Committee periodically discusses with management the Company's major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company's risk assessment and risk management policies.

†Our Compensation Committee helps the Board to identify the Company's exposure to any risks potentially created by our compensation programs and practices. For a further discussion of how the Compensation Committee helps mitigate this risk, see the section titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation Policy and Objectives" below.

†Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee helps the Board establish qualifications for a director nominee, including qualities and skills. They oversee the Corporate Governance policies, procedures and guidelines for the Company.

†Our Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee oversee risks relating to the Company's policies and assists the Board and management in promoting an organizational culture that encourages commitment to ethical conduct and a commitment to compliance with the law.

Fiscal 2020 Key Focus Areas



•Business Strategy Our Board works with management to guide a strategy that positions the Company for long-term success, focusing on delivering the best care to our residents. Additionally, our Board supports near term strategies as reflected in our ability to quickly pivot our focus and reflect the value of our unique organization structure in a time of great economic uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.
•People The Board and management share a fundamental belief that people matter, as evidenced more than ever this year. Our employees were absolutely critical in determining to remain indispensable and responsive during this global ongoing pandemic to save and improved countless lives. Their strength and willpower to do everything to care for our residents and the healthcare community have impacted the long-term care industry and our financial performance.
•Risk Oversight The Board regularly considers our risk profile when reviewing our overall business strategy and when making decisions impacting the Company. Individual performance objectives of the executive leadership team are aligned with the Company’s top enterprise-wide risks.

Engaging with Our Shareholders

Management and directors engage with our shareholders throughout the year in a variety of forums. Our interactions cover a broad range of governance and business topics, including proxy access, board elections, compensation practices, peer group composition and business strategy. Our engagement activities and meaningful exchanges to which we have been exposed provide us with a valuable understanding of our shareholders' perspectives and an opportunity to share views with them. We look forward to maintaining an open line of dialogue with our shareholders.

7 Ensign Group

We encourage you to visit the Corporate Governance area of the "Investor Relations" section of our website (http://investor.ensigngroup.net/corporate-governance) where you will find detailed information about our corporate governance practices and policies including each of our Committee's Charters, excluding the Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee.

The Company's Director Nomination Process

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the director nomination process. This committee is responsible for assisting the Board in establishing minimum qualifications for director nominees, including qualities and skills that members of our Board are expected to possess. These criteria include the candidate's personal and professional integrity, the candidate's financial literacy or other professional or business experience relevant to an understanding of the Company and our business, the candidate's demonstrated ability to think and act independently and with sound judgment, and the candidate's ability to be effective, in conjunction with other members or nominees of the Board in collectively serving the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and evaluates individuals qualified to become members of our Board. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then recommends that our Board select the director nominees for the election at the next annual meeting of shareholders, or to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors occurring between annual meetings of shareholders.

We believe it is important to have an appropriate mix of diversity for the optimal functionality of the Board. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter requires that the committee considers each candidate's qualities and skills and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers each candidate's background, race, ethnicity, gender, ability, judgment, skills and experience in the context of the needs and current make up of the Board when evaluating director nominees. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also committed to actively seeking women and minority candidates for the pool from which Board candidates are chosen. The Board believes it is important for each member of the Board to possess skills and knowledge in the areas of leadership of large, complex organizations, finance, strategic planning, laws and regulations, government relations and relevant industries, especially the healthcare and skilled nursing industries. These considerations help the Board as a whole to have the appropriate mix of diversity, characteristics, skills and experiences for the optimal functioning of the Board of Directors in its oversight of our Company. As part of its periodic self-assessment process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and evaluates its performance, including overall composition of the Board and the criteria that it uses for selecting nominees in light of the specific skills and characteristics necessary for the optimal functioning of the Board in its oversight of our Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers all of the criteria described above, including the candidate's diversity, in identifying and selecting nominees and in the future may establish additional minimum criteria for nominees.

Nomination Right of All Shareholders under Section 3.02 of our Bylaws. Pursuant to Section 3.02 of our amended and restated bylaws (our “Bylaws”), any shareholder may nominate one or more persons for election as a director at an annual meeting of shareholders. To do so, the shareholder must comply with the timely notice, information and consent provisions contained in our Bylaws. In order for an eligible shareholder's director nomination to be timely, the shareholder must deliver written notice to our corporate Secretary: (i) in the case of an annual meeting, not later than the close of business on the 60th day, nor earlier than the 90th day, prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders; provided, however, that in the event that no annual meeting of shareholders was held in the previous year or the annual meeting of shareholders is called for on a date that is not within 30 days of such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder must be so received no earlier than the close of business on the 90th day prior to such annual meeting of shareholders and not later than the close of business on the 60th day prior to such annual meeting of shareholders, or (ii) in the case of a special meeting of the shareholders called for the purpose of electing directors, not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the date on which public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders was made by the corporation, whichever occurs first. The written notice must include the information about the director nominee that is required to be provided pursuant to Section 3.02(a)-(i) of our Bylaws and the written consent of each proposed nominee to serve as a director if so elected. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in order to include information with respect to a stockholder nomination in the proxy statement and form of proxy for a stockholder’s meeting, stockholders must comply with the requirements of the Exchange Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. The presiding officer of an annual meeting of shareholders shall refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

Right of All Shareholders to Recommend Director Nominees to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Pursuant to Section 5 of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees for the Board recommended by shareholders. If an eligible shareholder wishes to recommend a director nominee to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, he or she should submit such recommendation in writing to the Chair, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, care of the Secretary of the Company, Chad A. Keetch, The Ensign Group, Inc., 29222 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 127, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675, by the deadline for shareholder proposals set forth in the Company's last proxy statement, specifying the information about the director nominee that is required to be provided pursuant to Section 5 of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter. All such recommendations will be brought to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall evaluate such suggested director nominees in accordance with the same criteria applicable to the evaluation of all director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is not required to include, or recommend to the Board for inclusion in the proxy statement, any proposed director nominees of the Board who are recommended by shareholders through this process.

8 Ensign Group

Committees of the Board of Directors and Related Matters

During fiscal year 2020, our Board had five standing Board Committees: the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee and the Special Committee. The Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, makes Board Committee and Board Committee chair assignments annually at its meeting immediately preceding the annual meeting of shareholders, although further changes to committee assignments are made from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board. The Board Committees, other than the Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee, operate pursuant to written charters, copies of which are available on our website at www.investor.ensigngroup.net/corporate-governance.

Attendance at Board, Committee and Annual Meetings

During the year ended December 31, 2020, our Board met five times. Each of the directors attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of our Board and the meetings of any of our Board Committees on which they served that were held during the term of each director. Our Board and the Board Committees also acted by way of various unanimous written consents for four times during the year ended December 31, 2020. In addition, the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee and the Board met, at times, without management present in executive session. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee met once and the Special Committee met three times without management present in executive session.

Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we encourage our directors to attend. At the 2020 Annual Meeting, all eight members of the Board were in attendance and we expect that at least a majority of our Board will attend the 2021 Annual Meeting.

An overview of the current composition of each Board Committee is set forth below.

Director

Compensation Committee

Audit Committee

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee

Special Committee(1)

Roy E. Christensen ª

Christopher R. Christensen «

Daren J. Shaw

Lee A. Daniels

Ann S. Blouin

Swati B. Abbott

Barry M. Smith

Barry R. Port

l Member

C Chair

ª Chairman Emeritus

« Chairman of the Board

(1) Special committee was formally dissolved effective May 28, 2020.

9 Ensign Group

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE


Committee Members	The primary functions of the Compensation Committee include:
Lee A. Daniels (Chair)	l	developing and reviewing policies relating to compensation and benefits;

Barry M. Smith	l	determining or recommending to our Board the cash and non-cash compensation of our executive officers;

Daren J. Shaw	l	evaluating the performance of our executive officers and overseeing management succession planning;

Number of Meetings in	l	administering or making recommendations to our Board with respect to the administration of our equity-based and other incentive compensation plans; and
Fiscal Year 2020:	l	overseeing the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the related Compensation Committee Report for inclusion in our annual proxy statement.
6

All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors, as such term is defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Compensation Committee has not delegated any powers or authority to the Chief Executive Officer or any other executive officer of the Company in determining executive officer compensation. Our Compensation Committee previously retained the services of Willis Towers Watson, a national consulting firm, to assist in the development and validation of our executive compensation and incentive programs in 2016. The Compensation Committee used the same guidelines developed and validated in 2016 to establish the executive compensation and incentive program for 2020. For a discussion of the processes and procedures for determining executive and director compensation and the role of compensation consultants in recommending the amount or form of compensation, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section below.

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE


Committee Members	The primary functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include:
Barry M. Smith (Chair)	l	assisting the Board in establishing the minimum qualifications for a director nominee, including the qualities and skills that members of our Board are expected to possess;

Daren J. Shaw	l	management succession planning;

Ann S. Blouin	l	developing, assessing, and recommending corporate governance policies to our Board;

Number of Meetings in	l	selecting, or recommending that our Board selects, the director nominees for election at the next annual meeting of shareholders, or to fill vacancies on our Board occurring between annual meetings of shareholders; and
Fiscal Year 2020:	l	identifying and evaluating individuals qualified to become members of our Board, consistent with criteria approved by our Board and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
4

All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent directors, as such term is defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules.

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE


Committee Members	The primary functions of the Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee include:
Ann S. Blouin (Chair)	l	overseeing our officers' response, as appropriate, to compliance and quality control issues and corrective actions;

Christopher R. Christensen	l	overseeing a system for internal monitoring and auditing of compliance and quality control issues;

Swati B. Abbott	l	designating a corporate compliance officer, and functioning as the compliance committee to which such compliance officer reports;

Barry M. Smith	l	ensuring that means exist for the delivery of appropriate compliance training and education to the officers and employees of our several subsidiaries;

Barry R. Port	l	establishing lines of communication for escalating compliance and quality control issues to our Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee and our Board; and

Number of Meetings in	l	overseeing the promulgation, and the updating from time to time as appropriate, of a written corporate compliance program that substantially conforms to the Office of the Inspector General Program Guidance for Nursing Facilities, including written policies, procedures and standards of conduct, as well as disciplinary guidelines to assist officers and employees charged with direct enforcement responsibility.
Fiscal Year 2020:
4

Of the members of the Quality Assurance and Compliance Committee Dr. Blouin, Ms Abbott and Mr. Smith are all independent directors, as such term is defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules.

10 Ensign Group

AUDIT COMMITTEE


Committee Members	The primary functions of the Audit Committee include:
Daren J. Shaw (Chair)	l	oversees the company's compliance programs and any legal or regulatory matters that may have a material impact on the Company's financial statements;

Lee A. Daniels	l	oversees portions of our code of ethics and business conduct that relate to the integrity of our financial reports.

Swati B. Abbott	l	oversees the functioning of our internal controls and oversees and participates in the resolution of internal control issues, where identified;

Number of Meetings in	l	reviews and approves our transactions with related persons;
Fiscal Year 2020:	l	pre-approves audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent accountants, and the fees to be paid in connection therewith;
5	l	oversees the engagement, replacement, compensation, qualifications, independence and performance of our independent auditors, and the conduct of the annual independent audit of our financial statements;
	l	oversees procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
	l	oversees the conduct of our financial reporting process and the integrity of our financial statements and other financial information provided by us to the public or any governmental or regulatory body;
	l	sets the "tone at the top" and emphasizes the importance of an environment that supports integrity in the financial reporting process;
	l	oversees processes for monitoring auditor independence;
	l	oversees implementation of new accounting standards;
	l	communicates with the outside auditor on matters related to the conduct of the audit and on critical audit matters expected to be described in the auditor's report; and
	l	reviews and understands non-GAAP measures, and related company policies and disclosure controls.

All members of the Audit Committee are independent directors, as such term is defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Each member of our Audit Committee can read, and has an understanding of, fundamental financial statements. Our Board has determined that Mr. Shaw qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in the rules and regulations established by the SEC. This designation is a disclosure requirement of the SEC related to Mr. Shaw's experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters. The designation does not impose on Mr. Shaw any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than those generally imposed on him as a member of our Audit Committee and our Board, and his designation as an Audit Committee financial expert pursuant to this SEC requirement does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of our Audit Committee or Board. Representatives of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal financial personnel regularly meet privately with the Audit Committee and have unrestricted access to this committee.

SPECIAL COMMITTEE


Committee Members	The primary functions of the Special Committee include:
Barry M. Smith (Chair)	l	representing the Board's, the Company's and the shareholders' interests in addressing allegations made against the Company; and

Daren J. Shaw	l	retaining and working with independent legal counsel and other third-party consultants to facilitate its work.

Lee A. Daniels

Number of meetings in
Fiscal Year 2020:
3

In September 2010, the Board appointed a Special Committee consisting solely of “independent directors” as such term is defined in the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Special Committee was formally dissolved effective May 28, 2020.

11 Ensign Group

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

In fiscal year 2020, our Chairman Emeritus received an annual retainer of $100,000. Our Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer each received their annual salary, which is disclosed in our Executive Compensation section and no additional compensation is paid for serving on the board. Each of our non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $30,000. In addition, each member of the Board Committees received the following retainers:


	Chair		Member
Committees	Retainer		Retainer
Audit	$	30,000	$	10,000
Quality Assurance and Compliance	30,000		6,000
Special	12,000		4,500
Nominating and Corporate Governance	12,000		2,000
Compensation	15,000		3,000

We do not compensate our non-employee directors other than for their service on our Board or Board Committees. Compensation for Board and Board Committee service is partially based upon relevant market data that we obtain by reviewing director compensation by other public companies in the skilled nursing industry. To establish board compensation, our Compensation Committee reviews the published director compensation information of other skilled nursing companies, including National Healthcare Corporation, Amedysis, Inc., Encompass Healthcare Corp., LTC Properties, Inc., Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., Welltower Inc., Select Medical Holdings Corp., CareTrust REIT Inc. and National Health Investors, Inc. Based on these reviews, the Compensation Committee sets its annual retainers for outside directors and the Chairman of the Board and retainers to the chairpersons of each Board Committee at levels that we believe are comparable to the median cash compensation paid to directors of these companies. The cash compensation payable to the Chairman of our Board is approximately equal to or less than the median cash compensation paid to the chairpersons of the boards of directors of the foregoing companies who receive compensation for their role as chairpersons of the board and who are not also serving as the chief executive officers of such companies. We have employed this methodology to set compensation for our non-employee directors for 2020.

Prior to completing our initial public offering in 2007, we made only two stock option grants to our non-employee directors, which vested immediately upon the grant date. Our 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan) and 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2017 Plan) contained an automatic stock grant program for our directors. Each non-employee director first elected to a three-year term prior to March 1, 2012 received an automatic stock grant for 1,800 shares of common stock on the 15th day of the month following each quarter end (the "Automatic Stock Grant Program"). Starting in 2015, each non-employee director first elected prior to March 1, 2012 who was elected to a new three-year term began receiving an automatic stock grant of 1,500 shares on the 15th day of the month following each quarter end after their current term expired and such shares vest over a three-year period, beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date.

During the second quarter of 2017, the Company's shareholders approved the 2017 Plan. The Company retired the 2007 Plan as a result of the approval of the 2017 Plan. Under the terms of the 2017 Plan, each non-employee director receives a quarterly restricted stock grant of 1,500 shares on the 15th day of the month following each quarter end and such shares will vest over a three-year period, beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date. Directors elected to fill less than a three-year term will receive a pro rata stock award. Effective the third quarter of 2019, the shares issuable to non-employee directors automatically granted decreased to 1,125 in connection with the Company’s increasing stock prices. All other terms of the awards remained unchanged.

All unvested restricted stock grants will become fully vested on the date any such non-employee director ceases serving on the Board unless such director is removed for cause. Pursuant to the Automatic Stock Grant Program, Board members receiving stock grants must maintain ownership of a minimum of thirty-three percent (33%) of the cumulative shares granted to him or her. Our Board and Compensation Committee considered the total compensation paid to directors of the peer group companies named above in deciding to award these automatic stock awards. However, our Board and Compensation Committee determined the amount of stock awards based upon what they considered to be an appropriate incentive for board service to our Company, and they did not attempt to base this number upon the amount awarded to directors of these other companies. Our Board has also determined that it may be necessary to provide additional incentives to prospective directors in order to recruit talented leaders to serve on the Board.

None of our directors or director nominees has any agreement or arrangement with any third party that relates to compensation or other payment in connection with that person’s candidacy or service as a director of our company.

12 Ensign Group

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation earned by our non-employee directors and Chairman Emeritus in 2020. Our Executive Chairman, who currently serves as Chairman of the Board, and our Chief Executive Officer, who currently serves as a director, do not receive any additional compensation for such service. Their compensation is disclosed in the Executive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement.


	Fees	Stock	All Other
	Earned	Awards	Compensation	Total
Name	($)	($)(1)	($)	($)
Roy E. Christensen	100,000	—	—	100,000

Daren J. Shaw(3)	66,875	209,093	—	275,968
Barry M. Smith(3)	56,796	209,093	—	265,889
Lee A. Daniels(3)	56,839	209,093	—	265,932
Swati B. Abbott (2)	46,000	156,116		202,116
Ann S. Blouin	62,000	209,093	—	271,093

(1)This column reflects the total dollar amount to be recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fair value of the stock awards granted to each of the directors during the 2020 fiscal year in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 718, Stock Compensation. Compensation expense for stock awards granted to Directors were recognized in full on the date these awards were granted. Awards granted to Dr. Blouin, and Messrs. Shaw, Smith and Daniels vest over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The table below outlines the details of the stock awards which were granted to directors during the 2020 fiscal year.


Date of Grant	Awards Granted to Each Recipient	Fair Value on Grant Date(a)	Recipients
1/15/2020	1,125	$47.09	Dr. Blouin and Messrs. Smith, Daniels and Shaw
4/15/2020	1,125	35.47	Dr. Blouin, Ms. Abbott and Messrs. Smith, Daniels and Shaw
7/15/2020	1,125	44.91	Dr. Blouin, Ms. Abbott and Messrs. Smith, Daniels and Shaw
10/15/2020	1,125	58.39	Dr. Blouin, Ms. Abbott and Messrs. Smith, Daniels and Shaw

(2)Ms. Abbott joined our Board effective on January 1, 2020.

(3)Messrs. Shaw, Smith and Daniels were members of the Special Committee that was formally dissolved effective May 28, 2020. Accordingly, the Special Committee members were compensated for a only partial year of service up until the committee was dissolved.

Communications with Directors

Shareholders who would like to send communications to our Board, any Board Committee or to any individual director may do so by submitting such communications to the Secretary of the Company, Chad A. Keetch, The Ensign Group, Inc., 29222 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 127, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675. We suggest, but do not require, that such submissions include the name and contact information of the shareholder making the submission and a description of the matter that is the subject of the communication. Mr. Keetch will then distribute such information to our Board and the committee chair for review. Communications received by the Company may be reviewed by Mr. Keetch to ensure appropriate and careful review of the matter.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to all employees, including employees of our subsidiaries, as well as each member of our Board. The code of ethics and business conduct is available on our website at www.investor.ensigngroup.net/corporate-governance.

We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information on our website, at the address specified above.

SUSTAINABILITY

We believe that sustainable development practices and consistent attention to social and governance priorities will help enhance long-term value for shareholders. In addition, our Board of Directors recognizes the importance of our sustainability initiatives and the need to provide effective oversight of those initiatives. For Ensign, sustainability means caring about the environmental and social impacts of our operations.

13 Ensign Group

Environmental Sustainability

We understand the importance of addressing environmental sustainability and have undertaken initiatives to responsibly manage our overall environmental footprint. We have mainly focused on three areas to drive environmental improvements: energy consumption, water use and waste.

We have made, and will continue to make, various capital investments with these three initiatives in mind. We continue to implement energy conservation measures throughout our locations such as light-emitting diode (LED) lighting retrofits, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) upgrades, roofing improvements, and changes in community maintenance. In similar ways, our water initiatives include smart controls, leak detection and repair, and behavioral changes, demonstrating our continued efforts to reduce water use. We are continuing our efforts to divert waste generated in our operations through effective recycling and waste reduction measures. Additionally, we partner with our vendors to purchase products and services that help our operations reduce their impact on the environment.

Social Sustainability

We aim to have an enduring impact on the communities in which we live and work by embodying our Company's core values. Elevate Charities is a non-profit organization that is dedicated to elevating the condition and quality of life for members of the senior healthcare community - employees, caregivers, family members, patients and residents. Elevate Charities has three unique funds: Heritage Fund, Heritage Scholarship Fund and the Emergency Fund.

The Emergency Fund is a way of passing the hat to help our co-workers whose lives are affected by tragedy. This program is funded for Company team members by the Company team members. All Company team members can contribute to the fund either through a one-time donation or by recurring payroll deduction. When in need of financial help due to financial hardships such as fire, hurricane, illness, accidents or other crises, Company team members can apply to receive financial assistance. To date, the Emergency Fund program has distributed over $8.8 million to Company co-workers in need.

The Heritage Fund and the Heritage Scholarship Fund engage in a mission to enhance the quality of life for seniors in our communities through caring service, fulfilling essential needs and providing education to caregivers. The Heritage Fund helps the caregiver identify specific and practical ways to meet the needs of those under their care. This can help provide a better life, improved experience and greater satisfaction for our aging population. The financial support provided by the Heritage Fund benefits seniors directly. Without this financial support, some seniors would not be able to receive the essential assistance they need. The Heritage Fund bridges the gap between what the healthcare system currently provides and the basic needs of individuals. The fund can provide hearing aids, glasses, dentures, walkers, and other therapies that are not covered under Medicare or Medicaid. In addition, the Heritage Scholarship Fund helps qualified clinical professionals who may not be able to afford to advance in the field of long-term care. Through grants and scholarships, the fund helps these qualified professionals gain the education needed to advance in the field of senior-focused healthcare. The Heritage Scholarship Fund can facilitate larger access, helping more caregivers and healthcare professionals have the information they need. For those who have a passion for senior-focused healthcare and are interested in progressing in their career, the fund can provide the resources needed.

Beyond these charities, our Company upholds the following policies and philosophies for maintaining and growing our social sustainability and responsibility:

•Human Rights & Responsibilities. We are committed to the dignity and rights of all people, especially those whose lives may be impacted by our operations. Among other things we are dedicated to prohibiting child labor, forced labor and discrimination while promoting the basic dignity of each resident, patient and employee at our facilities. We support our employee's occupational health and safety through providing sanitary facilities, abiding by all health and safety laws, ordinances and regulations governing facility uses and operations, and generally exceed acceptable levels of health and safety.

•Tenant Corporate Responsibility. Our tenant corporate responsibility aims to assist our triple-net tenants in maintaining, renovating, developing and operating their facilities in a manner consistent with generally accepted standards of sound governance.

•Accessibility to Care. We have dedicated ourselves to providing and transforming dignified post-acute and long-term care and firmly believe accessibility to this care is a human right to everyone. Our facilities aim to be the operation of choice within its local community by providing superior quality, affordable care. We rise to meet the needs of all our patients to ensure reliability and dignity for everyone.

•Human Capital. Our employees are at the heart of our Company and we are committed to their health, professional development and workplace satisfaction. Our core philosophies and policies in this regard relate to, among other things, our commitment to maintaining a workplace free of unlawful discrimination, competitive compensation and benefits for our employees, our commitment to employee retention, training, promotion, and engagement and satisfaction.

•Inclusion and Diversity. We believe diversity is key to our success. We are deeply committed to hiring and promoting inclusively, championing pay equity, increasing diverse representation at all levels, and fostering an inclusive culture that gives every employee the opportunity to do the best work of their lives.

14 Ensign Group

While we believe we have a good foundation, we are continuing to work in creating a more impactful approach to our sustainability strategy. We know that a focus on sustainability has a positive effect on our communities, employees, caregivers, family members, patients and residents.

AUDIT MATTERS

Proposal 2:

Approval of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Recommendation of the Board:

FOR

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent external audit firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. As a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking the shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Deloitte") as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021. The affirmative vote of a majority of the common stock having voting power present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote will be required to ratify the selection of Deloitte.

Shareholders are not required to ratify the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm. If shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider whether or not to retain Deloitte. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Representatives of Deloitte will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:


Type of fee	Description	2020		2019

Audit Fees	For the audits of the Company’s annual financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting, and reviews of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, as well as fees incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of registration statements with the SEC.	$	945,673	$	1,123,000
Audit Related Fees	Consists of fees billed for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements and are not reported above under the caption "Audit Fees". In 2019, these fees included services related to the audit of our discontinued operations associated with the Spin-Off.	—		1,749,000
Tax Fees	For tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.	—		—
All Other Fees	For subscription fees paid to Deloitte for use of accounting research tools.	3,295		2,600
Total		$	948,968	$	2,874,600

Pre-Approval Policies

Our Audit Committee approved all audit, audit-related, tax and other fees for services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm during the years presented. The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy. The Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy provides for general pre-approval for a specified range of fees for certain categories of routine services to be provided during a given calendar year. This general pre-approval is automatically renewed at the beginning of each calendar year, unless otherwise determined by the Audit Committee. If the cost of any proposed service exceeds the amount for which general pre-approval has been established, specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee is required. Specific pre-approval of services is considered at the regular meetings of the Audit Committee. The policy delegates authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to grant specific pre-approval between regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings for audit and non-audit services not to exceed $200,000 and other services not to exceed $100,000. The Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy also establishes a list of prohibited non-audit services. In making all of its pre-approval determinations, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, whether such services are consistent with the rules promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the "PCAOB") and the SEC regarding auditor independence, whether the independent auditor is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service, and whether the service might enhance the Company's ability to manage and control risk or improve audit quality. These and other factors are considered as a whole and no one factor is necessarily determinative.

15 Ensign Group

Audit Committee Report

Our Audit Committee has:

•Reviewed and discussed with our management the audited consolidated financial statements as well as the establishment and maintenance of internal controls over financial reporting.

•Discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC.

•Received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant's independence.

•Considered whether the provision of non-audit services provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm is compatible with maintaining its independence and has discussed with the auditors such auditors' independence.

Based on the review and discussions above, our Audit Committee recommended to our Board that the audited financial statements for the Company's year ended December 31, 2020 be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed with the SEC on February 3, 2021.

Submitted by Members of the Audit Committee:

•Daren J. Shaw (Chair)

•Lee A. Daniels

•Swati B. Abbott

16 Ensign Group

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following discussion and analysis provides information regarding our executive compensation objectives and principles, procedures, practices and decisions, and is provided to help give perspective to the numbers and narratives that follow in the tables in this section. This discussion will focus on our objectives, principles, practices and decisions with regards to the compensation of Christopher R. Christensen, Barry R. Port, Suzanne D. Snapper, Chad A. Keetch and Spencer W. Burton (our "Named Executive Officers").

Say on Pay

At our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we submitted our executive compensation program to a vote, on an advisory basis, of our shareholders and received the support of approximately 84.8% of the shares of common stock present and eligible to vote. The Compensation Committee considered the results of this shareholder advisory vote as one of many factors in structuring its compensation practices in 2020. We pay careful attention to any feedback we received from our shareholders regarding our executive compensation, including the say on pay vote. Given the support for the advisory vote on 2019 executive compensation, the Compensation Committee determined the fundamental characteristics of the program should remain intact for 2020.

In consideration of the shareholder vote at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Board has determined that the Company will hold an advisory vote on executive compensation every year in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders.

Compensation Policy and Objectives

We believe that compensation paid to our executive officers should be closely aligned with our performance and the performance of each individual executive officer on both a short-term and a long-term basis, based upon the value each executive officer provides to our company, and designed to assist us in attracting and retaining the best possible executive talent, which we believe is critical to our long-term success. Because we believe that compensation should be structured to ensure that a significant portion of compensation earned by executives will be correlated to factors that directly and indirectly influence shareholder value, the “at risk” compensation of our executive officers generally constitutes a large portion of their total compensation potential. In addition, commensurate with our belief that those of our employees who act like owners should have the opportunity to become owners, many of our executive officers have a significant level of stock ownership, which we believe aligns the incentives of the executive officers with the priorities of our shareholders. To that end, it is the view of our Board and Compensation Committee that the total compensation program for executive officers should consist of the following:

•Base salary;

•Annual and other short-term cash bonuses;

•Long-term incentive compensation; and

•Certain other benefits.

The Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program has been appropriately designed to provide a level of incentives that do not encourage our Named Executive Officers to take unnecessary risks in managing their respective functions. Our annual incentive compensation program is designed to reward annual financial and/or strategic performance in areas considered critical to our short- and long-term success. In addition, we measure performance on a variety of bonus criteria other than our profit to determine an executive's annual incentive compensation award, such as positive survey results, clinical quality standards, positive patient feedback and feedback from other employees regarding such executives' performance. We believe this discourages risk-taking that focuses excessively on short-term profits at the sacrifice of our long-term health. Likewise, our long-term equity incentive awards are directly aligned with long-term shareholder interests through their link to our stock price and multi-year ratable vesting schedules. In combination, the Compensation Committee believes that the various elements of our executive compensation program sufficiently tie our executives' compensation opportunities to our focus on sustained long-term growth and performance.

17 Ensign Group

The Compensation Committee’s charter enables the Compensation Committee to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel, or other adviser ("Compensation Adviser"). The Compensation Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of any such Compensation Adviser. In establishing our executive compensation packages, the Compensation Committee has historically reviewed compensation packages of executives of companies in the skilled nursing and other related industries based on publicly available information. Our Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate the services of a Compensation Adviser who reports to the Compensation Committee. Most recently, our Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson ("Willis Towers"), a national consulting firm, to assist in the development and validation of our executive compensation and incentive programs in 2016. As part of the study, Willis Towers also conducted a peer group analysis and benchmarking assessment on director and executive compensation. The results of this consultation, in combination with the Compensation Committee’s own research and analysis, were a part of the process the Compensation Committee undertook in determining the executive compensation and incentive programs for 2016 (including the grants of equity incentive awards for our executives and directors). We used the same guideline developed and validated by Willis Towers to establish our incentive program for 2018, 2019 and 2020.

The Compensation Committee may select, or receive advice from, a Compensation Adviser only after taking into consideration the following factors: (i) the provision of other services to the Company by the person that employs the Compensation Adviser, legal counsel or other adviser; (ii) the amount of fees received from the Company by the person that employs the Compensation Adviser, legal counsel or other adviser, as a percentage of the total revenue of the person that employs the Compensation Adviser, legal counsel or other adviser; (iii) the policies and procedures of the person that employs the Compensation Adviser, legal counsel or other adviser that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of the Compensation Adviser, legal counsel or other adviser with a member of the Compensation Committee; (v) any stock of the Company owned by the Compensation Adviser, legal counsel or other adviser; and (vi) any business or personal relationship of the Compensation Adviser, legal counsel, other adviser or the person employing the adviser with an executive officer of the Company. Based on the consideration of the various factors as set forth in the rules promulgated by the SEC, the Compensation Committee does not believe that its relationship with Willis Towers and the work of Willis Towers on behalf of the Compensation Committee has raised any conflict of interest.

Principal Economic Elements of Executive Compensation

Base Salary. We believe it is important to pay our executives' salaries within a competitive market range in order to attract and retain highly talented executives. Although historically we have not set executive salaries based upon any particular benchmarks, we may from time to time generally review relevant market data to assist us in our compensation decision process. We have historically validated our compensation decisions by comparing the compensation of executives at other public companies in the skilled nursing industry to the compensation of our executives. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the published compensation of the named executive officers of National Healthcare Corporation, Amedysis, Inc., Encompass Healthcare Corp., LTC Properties, Inc., Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., Welltower Inc., Select Medical Holdings Corp., CareTrust REIT Inc., and National Health Investors, Inc. We believe that the base salaries and the total compensation of our executives are on the lower end of base salaries and median total compensation of executives with similar positions at comparable companies. Each of our executive's base salary is generally determined based upon job responsibilities, individual experience and the value the executive provides to our company. The Compensation Committee considered each of these factors in determining the compensation each executive would be paid in 2020. We may elect to change this practice in future years, and periodically in the past, the Compensation Committee has elected to employ a Compensation Adviser to examine our compensation practices. The decision, if any, to materially increase or decrease an executive's base salary in subsequent years will likely be based upon these same factors and others recommended by a Compensation Adviser, if any. Our Compensation Committee makes decisions regarding base salary at the time the executive is hired, and makes decisions regarding any changes to base salary on an annual basis.

Annual Cash Bonuses. We establish an executive incentive program each year, pursuant to which certain executives may earn annual bonuses based upon our performance. Historically, in the first quarter of each year, our Compensation Committee identifies the plan's participants for the year and establishes an objective formula by which the amount, if any, of the plan's bonus pool will be determined. The Compensation Committee also has the discretion to allocate the bonus pool among the individual executives prior to the end of the year and any such early allocation will remain subject to further adjustments upon the final determination of the bonus pool calculations during the first quarter of each succeeding year. This formula is based upon adjusted annual income before provision for income taxes. The bonus pool is also adjusted to include certain clinical and governance performance that can increase or decrease the bonus pool based on the achievement of a pre-established target. The 2020 bonus pool excludes FMAP funding related to COVID-19 that was included in our operating results. Additionally, the increased expenses related to COVID-19 negatively impacted the total executive payout. In addition, approximately 30% of the 2020 bonus pool calculation was distributed directly to our front-line employees.

18 Ensign Group

The lowest target in 2020 increased by 19.0% from the lowest target in 2019. Our Compensation Committee established the following formula for the 2020 bonus pool:


Adjusted Annual Income Before Provision for Income Taxes (EBT) in 2020						Bonus Pool
For EBT up to $30.0 million						$—
For EBT greater than $30.0 million, but less than $35.0 million						EBT between $30.0 million and $35.0 million * 2.5%
For EBT greater than $35.0 million, but less than $40.0 million						$0.125 million + (amount of EBT between $35.0 million and $40.0 million * 5.0%)
For EBT greater than $40.0 million, but less than $45.0 million						$0.375 million + (amount of EBT between $40.0 million and $45.0 million * 7.5%)
For EBT greater than $45.0 million, but less than $55.0 million						$0.750 million + (amount of EBT between $45.0 million and $55.0 million * 10.0%)
For EBT greater than $55.0 million, but less than $75.0 million						$1.750 million + (amount of EBT between $55.0 million and $75.0 million * 12.5%)
For EBT greater than $75.0 million						$4.250 million + (amount of EBT over $75.0 million * 15.0%)

Based on performance, the formula above is adjusted for the following:

(1) for every 1% decline in performance from 2019 Spin-Adjusted levels, the calculated incentive payout pool declines by 5%;

(2) if performance improves between 0-5% from 2019 Spin-Adjusted levels, then the lowest target boundary will increase by 50%; and

(3) if performance declines by 20% or more, then no incentive will be awarded under the plan

Historically, in the first quarter of the subsequent year, our Compensation Committee subjectively allocates the bonus pool among the individual executives based upon the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer and the Compensation Committee's determinations regarding each participating executive's contribution to our financial, clinical and governance performance during the preceding year, and value to the organization going forward. The financial measure that our Compensation Committee considers is our adjusted annual income before provision for income taxes. The clinical measures that our Compensation Committee considers include our success in achieving positive survey results, reduced readmission rates, and Centers for Medicare Services' five-star performance for both the quality metric and survey results. The governance measures that our Compensation Committee considers include succession planning, culture of the organization, strategic organizational development and development of the leadership team throughout the organization. Our Compensation Committee also reviews and considers feedback from other employees regarding each executive's performance. Our Compensation Committee exercises discretion in the allocation of the bonus pool among the individual executives and has, at times, awarded bonuses that, collectively, were less than the bonus pool resulting from the predetermined formula.

The Company returned all of the Provider Relief Funding under the CARES Act (CARES), which during 2020 amounted to $141.7 million. As a result, the Company’s financial results and the bonus pool under the Executive Compensation Plan for 2020 did not include any CARES Act Provider Relief Funds. Also, at the direction of management, the Compensation Committee of the Board excluded the revenue amount of $45.4 million in FMAP funds from the 2020 Executive Compensation Plan bonus pool distribution. In addition, and also at the direction of management, the Compensation Committee and the board included all COVID-19-specific expenses thereby reducing the 2020 bonus pool distribution under the Executive Compensation Plan. As such, our executive bonus compensation under the Executive Compensation Plan for 2020 fiscal year does not include any FMAP funding and did reflect increased expenses related to COVID-19.

Based on the adjusted predetermined formula, the bonus pool under the Executive Compensation Plan for 2020 was $27.6 million. In addition, the Company redirected all of the FMAP-related funds to a special purpose front-line fund to be paid only to our caregivers and other front-line teams. This reduced the bonus pool from the Executive Compensation Plan by approximately 30%. Cash incentive performance bonuses for 2020 were allocated to the Named Executive Officers who participated in the executive incentive program as follows: Christopher Christensen, $1,706,892; Barry Port, $4,754,985; Suzanne Snapper, $3,982,804; Chad Keetch, $2,519,789; and Spencer Burton, $3,210,622. Beginning in 2011, we implemented a policy for allocating executive bonus compensation between cash and non-cash compensation, such that if the total executive pool is greater than the then-applicable stated amount in 2020, at the compensation committee discretion for every dollar greater than the stated amount, 75.0% of the incentive will be paid in cash and 25.0% will be paid in vested restricted stock awards. As the bonus pool was greater than the stated amount (which was $5.0 million for 2020), restricted stock awards were granted to the participating Named Executive Officers as follows: Christopher Christensen, $393,108; Barry Port, $1,095,015; Suzanne Snapper, $917,196; Chad Keetch, $580,211; and Spencer W. Burton, $739,378. These bonus stock awards are fully vested and subject to one-year transfer restriction. In addition, $413,000 from the bonus pool among the executives was given to the Service Center employees.

19 Ensign Group

Each year, our Compensation Committee reviews our financial performance goals and may adjust the bonus pool formula at its discretion to better align the amount available for annual executive bonuses with our objectives. Historically, the Compensation Committee has increased the amount of adjusted annual income before provision for income taxes that must be achieved in order to create the same bonus pool as the preceding year in order to increase the difficulty of receiving the same bonus. The allocation of this bonus pool to the participating executives remains discretionary based upon the Compensation Committee's determination of each participating executive's contribution to our annual performance and value to the organization going forward. The 2020 financial performance goals and bonus pool formula have been established by the Compensation Committee consistent with historical practices and guideline validated by Willis Towers to establish our incentive program for 2020. The 2020 plan includes specific governance performance goals, which include clinical performance metrics, succession planning and establishing a capital market strategy. In addition, the Compensation Committee has continued the “clawback” policy previously established, which allows our Board to recover performance-based compensation paid to our executives under our executive incentive plan in certain circumstances where there has been a restatement of the Company's financial results or where subsequent events diminish the performance metrics, including clinical results, upon which the prior incentive payments were based.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. We believe that long-term performance is achieved through an ownership culture. Accordingly, we encourage long-term performance by our executives and other key personnel throughout the organization through the use of stock-based awards. We have adopted equity incentive plans that permit the grant of stock, stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, and other stock-based awards. Historically, we have generally issued stock options and restricted stock under these plans.

In order to preserve the link between the interests of executives and other key personnel and those of shareholders, we generally grant stock options to those executives and others who have performed at a high level and have demonstrated qualities of an ownership culture. Our executives who have significant levels of stock ownership are not permitted to hedge the economic risk of such ownership. We intend to continue to provide long-term awards through the granting of stock-based awards. The individuals receiving these awards will be required to hold them for one year from the end of the calendar year in which they are earned. The ownership and restriction on the restricted stock awards will not terminate upon separation of the individual from the Company.

Except with respect to grants to our directors and other stock grants issued pursuant to the executive incentive plan, the stock options and restricted stock awards that we grant generally vest as to 20% of the shares of common stock underlying the option or restricted stock award on each anniversary of the grant date. If a recipient’s employment with us terminates, then the restricted stock that remains unvested as of the date of the termination of the recipient’s employment will be forfeited without compensation. Until vested, the restricted stock may not be transferred, and vested shares shall be subject to our insider trading policy. Stock options generally have a maximum term of ten years. The grant date of our stock options and restricted stock awards is generally the date our Board or Compensation Committee meets to approve such stock option grants or restricted stock awards. Our Board or Compensation Committee historically has approved stock-based awards at regularly scheduled meetings. Our Board and Compensation Committee intend to continue this practice of approving the majority of stock-based awards at regularly scheduled meetings on a quarterly basis, unless earlier approval is required for a new-hire inducement or position change grant; regardless of whether or not our Board or Compensation Committee knows material non-public information on such date. The exercise price of our stock options is the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market on the date of grant. Prior to the exercise of an option, the holder has no rights as a shareholder with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the option, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. However, the recipients of restricted stock will have the right to vote and to receive any dividends or other distributions paid with respect to their shares of restricted stock, whether vested or unvested.

Mr. Christopher Christensen and Mr. Barry Port has made recommendations to our Compensation Committee and Board regarding the amount of stock options and other compensation to grant to our other executives based upon his assessment of their performance, and may continue to do so in the future. Our executive officers, however, do not have any role in determining the timing of our stock option grants.

Although we do not have any formal policy for determining the amount of stock-based awards or the timing of our stock-based awards, we have historically granted stock options or restricted stock to high-performing employees in recognition of their individual achievements and contributions to our company, and in anticipation of their future service and achievements. We may in the future introduce a more formal plan.

20 Ensign Group

Other Compensation. Our executives are eligible to receive the same benefits that are available to all employees, including the premiums paid to provide life insurance equal to each executive's annual salary and the premiums to provide accidental death and dismemberment insurance. For 2020, Christopher Christensen, Barry Port and Spencer Burton received automobile allowances of $15,900, $11,000 and $10,800, respectively. In addition, Christopher Christensen, Barry Port and Chad Keetch received third-party tax service payments of $17,335, $6,975 and $3,005, respectively.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation. The Company implemented non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the DCP) that was effective in 2019 for our executives. The DCP allows participating executives to defer up to 100% of their eligible bonuses. Additionally, the plan allows for the employee deferrals to be deposited into a rabbi trust and the funds are generally invested in individual variable life insurance contracts owned by us that are specifically designed to informally fund savings plans of this nature. This plan was expanded to the executives and other highly compensation employees on January 1, 2020 to allow the deferral of a portion of their base compensation.

Hedging Transactions

Forms of hedging or monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts, allow a director, officer or employee to lock in much of the value of his or her stock holdings, often in exchange for all or part of the potential for upside appreciation in the stock. These transactions allow the director, officer or employee to continue to own the covered securities, but without the full risks and rewards of ownership. When that occurs, the director, officer or employee may no longer have the same objectives as the Company’s other stockholders. Therefore, the Company discourages all directors, officers or employees that hold the Company's shares from engaging in such transactions. Any person wishing to enter into such an arrangement must first pre-clear the proposed transaction with the Board.

Tax Treatment of Compensation

The tax reform legislation signed into law on December 22, 2017 made the following changes to Code Section 162(m), which became effective on January 1, 2018: (1) the annual $1.0 million compensation deduction limit will apply to any individual who served as the chief executive officer or chief financial officer at any time during the taxable year and the three other most highly compensated officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) for the taxable year; (2) once an individual becomes a covered employee subject to Code Section 162(m) for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, that individual will remain a covered employee for all future years, including after termination of employment or even death; and (3) the exemption under Code Section 162(m) for qualified performance-based compensation and commissions will be eliminated (other than with respect to payments made pursuant to certain "grandfathered" arrangements entered into prior to November 2, 2017), so that all compensation paid to a covered employee in excess of $1.0 million will be nondeductible, including post-termination and post-death payments, severance, deferred compensation and payments from nonqualified plans.

Due to the tax reform legislation, and in particular the repeal of Code Section 162(m) performance-based compensation exemption, compensation that is paid from bonus plans, equity compensation awards and other incentive compensation arrangements will now likely count against the Code Section 162(m) annual $1.0 million limit and therefore it is likely that compensation paid to covered employees which exceeds $1.0 million in a given year will not be tax deductible.

The Compensation Committee believes that certain circumstances factors other than tax deductibility take precedence when determining the forms and levels of executive compensation most appropriate and in the best interests of us and our shareholders. For example, the Compensation Committee may approve compensation, such as discretionary cash bonuses or time-vesting restricted stock awards, that will not meet the Section 162(m) requirements in order to, among other things, enable competitive levels of total compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

Given our changing industry and business, as well as the competitive market for outstanding executives, the Compensation Committee believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to design compensation programs consistent with its overall executive compensation philosophy even if some executive compensation is not fully deductible. While the Compensation Committee cannot predict how the deductibility limit may impact our compensation program in future years, the Compensation Committee intends to maintain an approach to executive compensation that strongly links pay to performance.

21 Ensign Group

Alignment of pay with performance

Our executive compensation in 2020 continued to deliver pay supported by strong, consistent operating and total shareholder return performance. The following charts show CEO total compensation (as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table) compared with the value of $100 investment made in Ensign's stock on December 31, 2015, the first full year after the CareTrust spin-off. For the years 2015 through 2018, the CEO compensation was related to services from Christopher R. Christensen. Subsequently, Barry R. Port became the Chief Executive Officer, which his CEO compensation is reflected in the years 2019 and 2020. The value of investment chart only incorporates the value of The Ensign Group, Inc. stock and does not incorporate the value shareholders received in connection with our spin-offs of CareTrust REIT (CTRE) and The Pennant Group, Inc. (PNTG).

*Assumes $100 invested on 12/31/15 in stock in index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Since 2015, Ensign has delivered sustained growth, increasing total revenue increased $1.2 billion, representing a 15.2% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) while our diluted GAAP earning per share (EPS) from continued operations grew from $0.77 in the 2015 to $3.06, representing a 31.8% CAGR.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Below is biographical information for each of our current executive officers as of March 31, 2021, other than Messrs. Christopher R. Christensen and Barry R. Port (for whom biographical information is shown under "Ensign's Board of Directors"). Each executive officer serves at the discretion of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer.

Suzanne D. Snapper

AGE

Position Held Since

Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

August 2009

Ms. Snapper is responsible for the Company's accounting, finance, information technology, tax, internal controls, investor relations, managed care, treasury and finance risk management functions. She has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2009 and previously served as our Vice President of Finance since joining Ensign in 2007. As Vice President of Finance, Ms. Snapper played a key role in taking the Company public in 2007. She also oversaw the implementation of our internal controls over financial reporting. Prior to joining the Company, she worked from 1996 to April 2007 as an accountant with KPMG LLP, where her practice included providing audit services for public companies in the technology, transportation and quick serve restaurant industries. Ms. Snapper is a certified public accountant.

22 Ensign Group

Chad A. Keetch

AGE

Position Held Since

Chief Investment Officer, Executive Vice President and Secretary

June 2014

Mr. Keetch is responsible for our acquisitions, real estate matters, capital market transactions, investor relations, and new ventures. Mr. Keetch also serves as our Secretary and is responsible for assisting our Board and management with various governance matters. He was appointed as our Executive Vice President and Secretary on June 1, 2014. Prior to 2014, he served as our Vice President of Acquisitions and Business Legal Affairs and Assistant Secretary, where he was responsible for our acquisitions, real estate matters, securities transactions and investor relations. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Keetch was an attorney at Stoel Rives LLP from September 2008 to March 2010 and Kirkland & Ellis LLP from September 2005 through September 2008, where his practice emphasized mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, capital markets transactions and corporate governance issues.

Spencer W. Burton

AGE

Position Held Since

President and Chief Operating Officer, Ensign Services, Inc.

May 2019

Mr. Burton is responsible for providing consulting services and overseeing our organization's ongoing skilled nursing operations. He has served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ensign Services, Inc., which provides consulting and management services to our skilled nursing and assisted living operations, since May 2019. He previously served as the President of our subsidiary, Pennant Healthcare, Inc., which supervised the operations of facilities in the Northwest, since October 2013. As President of Pennant Healthcare and as an operator since 2006, Mr. Burton has successfully operated skilled nursing and senior living facilities, developed leaders and directed the Company's growth efforts across several states.

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

Pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"), the SEC adopted a rule requiring U.S. publicly-traded companies to disclose the ratio of the annual total compensation of their principal executive officer ("PEO") to that of their median employee. This disclosure is required to be included in this Proxy Statement and requires that our median employee be selected from all employees, including full-time and part-time employees.

Because the SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio permit companies to use various methodologies and assumptions, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonable estimates that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable with the pay ratio that we have reported. While it is common practice in our industry to outsource non-patient functions such as dietary, housekeeping and laundry, it is our company's practice to keep these functions in-house. Approximately 53% of our total employees consists of dietary aids, housekeepers, cooks, nursing assistants and maintenance staffs. In particular, it is important to bear in mind that we employ approximately 30,000 employees in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin as of November 30, 2020, which will impact the comparability of our PEO pay ratio.

While performing our 2020 pay ratio analysis, we determined that our previously identified median employee was no longer employed by us as of November 30, 2020, so we concluded that we should re-identify a new median employee using the calculation set forth below. We used November 30, 2020 to determine our employee population instead of December 31, 2020 because we believe it provides a more accurate representation of our employee population. The calculation uses the same methodologies, material assumptions, adjustments and estimates as we used in our pay ratio disclosure for 2019.

We calculated our pay ratio in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC, to arrive at a reasonable estimate. Our total employee population as of November 30, 2020 was 23,830, which included all full- and part-time employees and excluded employees on leaves of absence, on-call workers and the workforce at operations that we acquired in 2020. Our on-call employees are not regularly scheduled employees, but rather are only scheduled on an as-needed basis. We have approximately 5,300 employees (approximately 18% of our total workforce) that are on-call. We had approximately 1,200 employees across the operations that we acquired in 2020 (approximately 4% of our total workforce).

We identified our median employee by using total 2020 compensation for all individuals, excluding our PEO, who were employed by us on November 30, 2020. In the case of salaried employees, we annualized the salary of those who joined the Company during 2020. For hourly employees that joined the Company in 2020, we annualized the number of weeks worked to determine a 52-week equivalent compensation. We acknowledge that this may not be representative of the actual hours the employees may work during the year and may represent less than or more than the actual wages these individuals may earn during the year. To identify the employee with the median total annual compensation, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the

23 Ensign Group

median employee, we adopted a variety of methodologies, applied certain exclusions, and made estimates based on our payroll and employment records, in a manner consistent with SEC rules. We used taxable wages from December 1, 2019 to November 30, 2020 to identify the median employee. Using this methodology, we determined that our median employee was a part-time, hourly staff member with total compensation of $35,100. This total compensation figure reflects employment on a part-time hourly basis, for which the number of hours can range between one and 31 hours per week, and does not include the potential bonus that full-time, salaried employees are eligible to receive. The figure also is not necessarily representative of the compensation of other post-acute employees or of our overall compensation practices. The wages of part-time employees cannot be translated into a full-time salary for the calculation of the CEO Pay Ratio in accordance with Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.

The Company’s PEO is our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Port, who has been our Chief Executive Officer since May 2019. Based on an annual total compensation of our median employee for 2020 of $35,100, and annual total compensation for our Chief Executive Officer in 2020 as reported in the “Total” column of our Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement of $6,517,328, the ratio of our Chief Executive Officer annual total compensation to our median employee’s annual total compensation was computed to be 186 to 1.

The SEC's rules requiring pay ratio disclosure allow companies to exercise a significant amount of flexibility in determining the median employee and does not mandate that each public company use the same method. In addition, our compensation philosophy reflects fair pay based on a person's role in the Company, a subjective determination of the market value of that person's job and that person's performance in that position. As a result, the annual total compensation of our median employee is unique to that person and is not an indicator of the annual total compensation of any of our other employees and is not comparable to the annual total compensation of employees at other companies. Similarly, we would not expect that the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to our median employee to be a number that can be compared to the ratio determined by other companies in any meaningful fashion.

24 Ensign Group

Compensation Committee Report

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with our management. Based on such review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Submitted by Members of the Compensation Committee:

•Lee A. Daniels (Chair)

•Daren J. Shaw

•Barry M. Smith

25 Ensign Group

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table shows information regarding the compensation earned during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 by our Named Executive Officers. For a discussion of the compensation of our directors, see “Director Compensation”.

Summary Compensation Table


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Option Awards($)(1)	Stock Awards ($)(2)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3)	All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)

Christopher R. Christensen	2020	538,579		85,142	482,788	1,706,892	36,837	(4)	2,850,238
Co-Founder, Executive Chairman	2019	522,892		383,166	1,719,859	3,658,133	27,662		6,311,712
and Chairman of Board (Since May 2019)	2018	505,198		—	2,521,548	2,667,852	35,261		5,729,859

Barry R. Port	2020	473,800		85,142	1,184,695	4,754,985	18,706	(5)	6,517,328
Chief Executive Officer (since May 2019)	2019	460,000	(9)	306,533	1,634,259	3,658,133	14,634		6,073,559
	2018	356,477		—	1,752,454	2,112,766	14,742		4,236,439

Suzanne D. Snapper	2020	391,400		85,142	1,006,876	3,982,804	1,851	(6)	5,468,073
Chief Financial Officer	2019	380,000	(9)	287,374	1,677,269	3,493,724	4,228		5,842,595
and Executive Vice President	2018	336,014		—	1,914,244	2,059,056	4,100		4,313,414

Chad A. Keetch	2020	355,350		85,142	669,891	2,519,789	3,005	(7)	3,633,177
Chief Investment Officer	2019	345,000	(9)	191,583	1,149,950	2,014,043	3,018		3,703,594
and Executive Vice President and Secretary	2018	309,915		—	1,486,699	1,442,086	2,788		3,241,488

Spencer W. Burton	2020	301,275		170,283	918,738	3,210,622	12,514	(8)	4,613,432
President and Chief Operating Officer, Ensign Services, Inc. (Since May 2019)	2019	292,500		287,374	932,399	1,438,590	14,270		2,965,133

(1)The annual amounts shown are the amounts of total compensation cost which will be recognized over the five-year vesting period related to options to purchase common stock which were granted during fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, as a result of the adoption of ASC 718. These amounts disregard the estimated forfeiture rate which is considered when recognizing the ASC 718 expense in the consolidated financial statements. These awards are not immediately exercisable and vest over five years. For a discussion of valuation and forfeiture assumptions, see Note 16 in our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Options awards prior to September 30, 2019 represent historical values prior to the impact of the Pennant Spin-Off. On October 1, 2019, the Company completed the separation of its transitional and skilled nursing services, ancillary businesses, home health and hospice operations and substantially all of its senior living operations into two separate, publicly traded companies.

(2)The annual amounts shown are the amounts of compensation cost which will be recognized over the five-year vesting period related to restricted stock awards which were granted during fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, as a result of the adoption of ASC 718. These amounts disregard the estimated forfeiture rate which is considered when recognizing the ASC 718 expense in the consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of valuation and forfeiture assumptions, see Note 16 in our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. In addition, a portion of the bonuses paid under the 2020 executive incentive plan to Christopher Christensen, Barry Port, Suzanne Snapper, Chad Keetch and Spencer Burton of $393,108, $1,095,015, $917,196, $580,211 and $739,378, respectively. In 2019, bonuses were paid to Christopher Christensen, Barry Port, Suzanne Snapper, Chad Keetch and Spencer Burton of $791,867, $791,867, $756,276, $435,958 and $311,410, respectively, and in 2018, bonuses were paid to Christopher Christensen, Barry Port, Suzanne Snapper and Chad Keetch of $1,057,148, $837,204, $815,944 and $571,449, respectively, was in the form of fully vested stock awards. See further discussion under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis--Principal Economic Elements of Executive Compensation." Including in the stock awards total is the 2019 LTI Plan that provides certain employees of the Company and Pennant who assisted in the consummation of the Spin-Off were granted shares of restricted stock upon the successful completion of the Spin-Off. Christopher Christensen, Barry Port, Suzanne Snapper, Chad Keetch and Spencer Burton received Pennant stock awards for the amount of $499,992, $499,992, $599,993, $499,992 and $299,989, respectively. The stock awards from January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019 represents historical values prior to the impact of the Spin-Off, and awards from October 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 reflect the impact of the Spin-Off Conversion.

(3)The amounts shown in this column constitute the cash bonuses made to certain Named Executive Officers. Christopher Christensen, Suzanne Snapper, Barry Port and Chad Keetch participated in our executive incentive program. These awards are discussed in further detail under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis--Principal Economic Elements of Executive Compensation." The amounts shown include any amounts voluntarily deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan. See Nonqualified Deferred Compensation below.

(4)Consists of term life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment insurance payments of $1,314, a matching contribution to The Ensign Group, Inc. 401(k) retirement plan of $2,288, third-party tax service payments of $17,335 and a car allowance of $15,900.

(5)Consists of term life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment insurance payments of $731, third-party tax service payments of $6,975 and a car allowance of $11,000.

(6)Consists of term life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment insurance payments of $591 and a matching contribution to The Ensign Group, Inc. 401(k) retirement plan of $1,260.

(7)Consists of third-party tax service payments of $3,005.

(8)Consists of term life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance payments of $289, a matching contribution to The Ensign Group, Inc. 401(k) retirement plan of $1,425, and a car allowance of $10,800.

(9)The amounts shown includes the base salary increase that took effect in June 2019. The base salary increase was due to the executive position changes that was effective in May 2019. Barry R. Port, former Chief Operating Officer of Ensign Services, Inc., became the Chief Executive Officer. Suzanne Snapper, our Chief Financial Officer since August 2009, was appointed as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President. Lastly, Chad Keetch, our Executive Vice President and Secretary since June 2014, was appointed Chief Investment Officer, Executive Vice President & Secretary.

26 Ensign Group

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards made to our Named Executive Officers during 2020.


		All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares or Stock Units (#)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)	Grant Date Fair Value of Options and Stock Awards ($)

Name	Grant Date

Christopher R. Christensen	3/3/2020	18,845	(1)	—	—	791,867
	5/28/2020	2,000		—	—	89,680
	5/28/2020	—		5,000	44.84	85,142	(2)

Barry R. Port	3/3/2020	18,845	(1)	—	—	791,867
	5/28/2020	2,000		—	—	89,680
	5/28/2020	—		5,000	44.84	85,142	(2)

Suzanne D. Snapper	3/3/2020	17,998	(1)	—	—	756,276
	5/28/2020	2,000		—	—	89,680
	5/28/2020	—		5,000	44.84	85,142	(2)

Chad A. Keetch	3/3/2020	10,375	(1)	—	—	435,958
	5/28/2020	2,000		—	—	89,680
	5/28/2020	—		5,000	44.84	85,142	(2)

Spencer W. Burton	3/3/2020	7,411		—	—	311,410
	5/28/2020	4,000		—	—	179,360
	5/28/2020	—		10,000	44.84	170,283	(2)

(1)Represents the number of shares of our common stock awarded in lieu of a cash bonus payable under our executive incentive plan in 2020. These shares were fully vested on the grant date. In addition, the value of these shares is included in the 2019 Executive Compensation bonus pool which is already disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)The options amounts shown are the aggregate fair value of the stock option awards which were granted under our 2017 Plan in fiscal year 2020, which will be recognized over a five-year vesting period, as a result of adoption of ASC 718. These amounts disregard the estimated forfeiture rate which is considered when recognizing the ASC 718 expense in the consolidated financial statements. These awards are not immediately exercisable and vest over five years. For a discussion of valuation and forfeiture assumptions, see Note 16 in our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

27 Ensign Group

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table lists the outstanding equity incentive awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2020.


	Option Awards					Stock Awards
	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Un- exercisable	Option Exercise Price		Option Expiration	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
Name	(#)(1)	(#)(1)	($)(3)		Date	(#)	($)(2)

Christopher R. Christensen	90,832	—	10.89	(4)	5/29/2024	—	—
	10,618	—	21.39		7/30/2025	—	—
	4,719	1,180	15.93		8/31/2026	400	29,168
	10,618	7,079	15.80		5/25/2027	—	—
	—	—	—		—	24,000	1,750,080
	4,719	18,878	45.34		5/30/2029	6,400	466,688
	—	5,000	44.84		5/28/2030	2,000	145,840

Barry R. Port	10,618	—	21.39		7/30/2025	—	—
	4,719	1,180	15.93		8/31/2026	400	29,168
	5,663	3,775	15.80		5/25/2027	1,280	93,338
	—	—	—		—	15,000	1,093,800
	3,775	15,102	45.34		5/30/2029	5,120	373,350
	—	5,000	44.84		5/28/2030	2,000	145,840

Suzanne D. Snapper	8,112	—	5.44		10/27/2021	—	—
	8,650	—	6.75		10/31/2022	—	—
	10,812	—	8.26		6/12/2023	—	—
	10,812	—	8.98		8/1/2023	—	—
	4,325	—	9.74		10/29/2023	—	—
	173,013	—	10.89	(4)	5/29/2024	—	—
	10,618	—	21.39		7/30/2025	—	—
	6,607	1,651	15.93		8/31/2026	560	40,835
	4,955	3,303	15.80		5/25/2027	1,120	81,670
	—	—	—		—	18,000	1,312,560
	3,539	14,158	45.34		5/30/2029	4,800	350,016
	—	5,000	44.84		5/28/2030	2,000	145,840

Chad A. Keetch	4,325	—	6.26		2/8/2022	—	—
	4,325	—	6.66		7/26/2022	—	—
	1,732	—	6.75		10/31/2022	—	—
	4,326	—	8.26		6/12/2023	—	—
	640	—	9.74		10/29/2023	—	—
	36,263	—	10.89	(4)	5/29/2024	—	—
	10,618	—	21.39		7/30/2025	—	—
	6,607	1,651	15.93		8/31/2026	560	40,835
	4,955	3,303	15.80		5/25/2027

SEC Form DEF 14A filed by The Ensign Group, Inc.