DEF 14A 1 ny20008379x2_def14a.htm DEF14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐			Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐			Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☒			Definitive Proxy Statement
☐			Definitive Additional Materials
☐			Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

Bionano Genomics, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

☒			No fee required.
☐			Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐			Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

BIONANO GENOMICS, INC.

9540 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100

San Diego, CA 92121

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On June 14, 2023

Dear Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Bionano Genomics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to be held on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via live webcast on the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. You will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote. You will need to have the control number included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your voting instruction form, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials to join the virtual Annual Meeting. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

You are being asked to vote on the following matters:

To elect the three nominees for Class II director named in the accompanying proxy statement, each to hold office until the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until a successor is duly elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. We refer to this proposal as the “Director Election Proposal” or “Proposal 1.”

2.	To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the accompanying proxy statement. We refer to this proposal as the “Say-On-Pay Proposal” or “Proposal 2.”

3.	To ratify the selection of BDO USA, LLP by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. We refer to this proposal as the “Auditor Ratification Proposal” or “Proposal 3.”

To approve a series of alternate amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to effect, at the option of our Board of Directors, a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio between 1-for-5 and 1-for-10, inclusive, as determined by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion. We refer to this as the “Reverse Stock Split Proposal” or “Proposal 4.”

5.	To approve the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal). We refer to this as the “Adjournment Proposal” or “Proposal 5.”

6.	To conduct any other business properly brought before the meeting.

These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.

The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. To participate, vote or submit questions during the Annual Meeting via live webcast, please visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

The record date for the Annual Meeting is April 24, 2023. Stockholders of record must have the 16-digit control number that is shown on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card if you receive the proxy materials by mail. If your shares are held in street name and your voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials indicates that you may vote those shares through the http://www.ProxyVote.com website, then you may access, participate in, and vote at the Annual Meeting with the 16-digit control number indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Otherwise, stockholders who hold their shares in street name should contact their bank, broker, or other nominee (preferably at least five days before the Annual Meeting) and obtain a “legal proxy” in order to be able to participate in or vote at the Annual Meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders’ Meeting to Be Held on Wednesday, June 14, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023.

The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.

			By Order of the Board of Directors,

			/s/ R. Erik Holmlin, Ph.D.
			R. Erik Holmlin, Ph.D.
			Secretary

San Diego, California

April 28, 2023

You are cordially invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES. As an alternative to voting online at the Annual Meeting, you may vote via the Internet, by telephone or, if you receive a paper proxy card, by mailing the completed proxy card. Voting instructions are provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or, if you receive a paper proxy card by mail, the instructions are printed on your proxy card.

Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote online at the Annual Meeting.

BIONANO GENOMICS, INC.

9540 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100

San Diego, CA 92121

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on June 14, 2023

Our Board of Directors (sometimes referred to as the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Bionano Genomics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (sometimes referred to as “we,” “us,” the “Company” or “Bionano”) to be held virtually, via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023, on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, and any one or more adjournments or postponements thereof. Stockholders attending the virtual meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting.

For the Annual Meeting, we have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Annual Report”), to our stockholders primarily via the Internet. On or about April 28, 2023, we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) that contains notice of the Annual Meeting and instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet, how to vote at the Annual Meeting and how to request printed copies of the proxy materials.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 24, 2023 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 306,555,707 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote and one share of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by stockholders for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting for ten days before the Annual Meeting during normal business hours at our address above.

The Annual Report, which contains consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, accompanies this proxy statement. You also may obtain a copy of the Annual Report that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), without charge, by writing to our Secretary at 9540 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121, Attention: Secretary.

Proposals	Page	Board Recommendation
Proposal 1: Election of the three nominees for Class II director named herein, each to hold office until the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until a successor is duly elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier death, resignation or removal (the “Director Election Proposal”).	14	For each director nominee

Proposal 2: Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed herein (the “Say-on-Pay Proposal”).	28	For

Proposal 3: Ratification of the selection of BDO USA, LLP by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 (the “Auditor Ratification Proposal”).	29	For

Proposal 4: Approval of a series of alternate amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to effect, at the option of our Board of Directors, a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio between 1-for-5 and 1-for-10, inclusive, as determined by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion (the “Reverse Stock Split Proposal”).	31	For

Proposal 5: Approval of the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal) (the “Adjournment Proposal”).	40	For

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING

Why did I receive a notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the Internet?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we have sent you the Notice because the Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting, including at any one or more adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice.

We intend to mail the Notice on or about April 28, 2023 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Will I receive any other proxy materials by mail?

We may send you a proxy card, along with a second Notice, on or after May 8, 2023.

Where and when is the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 14, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via live webcast on the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. A summary of the information you need to attend the Annual Meeting online is provided below:

•	Any stockholder may listen to the Annual Meeting and participate live via webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023. The webcast will begin at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time.

•	Stockholders of record as of the Record Date may vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting via live webcast.

•

Stockholders of record as of the Record Date may also submit questions no earlier than 15 minutes prior to the beginning of the webcast for the Annual Meeting by logging in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023 and entering the control number included on the Notice, voting instruction form or proxy card.

•	To enter the meeting, please enter your control number.

•	If you do not have your control number, you will be able to listen to the meeting only and you will not be able to vote or submit questions during the meeting.

•	Instructions on how to connect to and participate in the Annual Meeting via the Internet are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023.

We recommend that you log in approximately 5 minutes before 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time to ensure you are logged in when the Annual Meeting starts. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or our Annual Report for fiscal year 2022.

If you plan to vote during the Annual Meeting, you may still do so even if you have already returned your proxy.

What do I need in order to be able to participate in the Annual Meeting online?

You will need the control number included on your Notice, voting instruction form or your proxy card in order to be able to vote your shares or submit questions during the Annual Meeting. If you do not have your control number, you will be able to listen to the meeting only, you will not be able to vote or submit questions during the meeting. Instructions on how to connect and participate in the Annual Meeting via the Internet are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023.

What if during the Annual Meeting I have technical difficulties or trouble accessing the live webcast of the Annual Meeting?

On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you encounter any difficulties accessing the live webcast of the Annual Meeting or during the Annual Meeting, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the log-in page for our virtual Annual Meeting for assistance.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

On the Record Date, there were 306,555,707 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote and one share of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding. The share of Series A Preferred Stock may only vote on the Reverse Stock Split Proposal as described below.

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, we urge you to fill out and return the proxy card that may be mailed to you, or vote by proxy over the telephone or on the Internet as instructed below to ensure your vote is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank

If on the Record Date, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. However, if your voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials indicates that you may vote those shares through the http://www.ProxyVote.com website, then you may access, participate in, and vote at the Annual Meeting with the 16-digit control number indicated on that voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Otherwise, stockholders who hold their shares in street name should contact their bank, broker, or other nominee (preferably at least five days before the Annual Meeting) and obtain a “legal proxy” in order to be able to participate in or vote at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you also have the right to direct your broker, bank, dealer or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting virtually.

How many votes do I have?

On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of the Record Date. The holder of the one outstanding share of our Series A Preferred Stock has 3,000,000,000 votes but has the right to vote only on the Reverse Stock Split Proposal and the Series A Preferred Stock votes must be voted in the same proportion as the votes cast by shares of common stock on such proposal. For example, if 60% of the votes cast by holders of common stock for the Reverse Stock Split Proposal vote “For” the proposal and 40% vote “Against” the proposal, the holder of the share of Series A Preferred Stock will cast 1,800,000,000 votes “For” the Reverse Stock Split Proposal and 1,200,000,000 votes “Against” the Reverse Stock Split Proposal. The Series A Preferred Stock will vote on the Reverse Stock Split Proposal as a single class with the common stock. The share of Series A Preferred Stock will be automatically redeemed by us effective upon the approval of the Reverse Stock Split Proposal.

What am I voting on?

There are five matters scheduled for a vote:

•	Proposal 1: Election of the three nominees for Class II director named herein, each to hold office until the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until a successor is duly elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier death, resignation or removal;

•	Proposal 2: Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed herein;

•	Proposal 3: Ratification of the selection of BDO USA, LLP by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023;

•

Proposal 4: Approval of a series of alternate amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to effect, at the option of our Board of Directors, a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio between 1-for-5 and 1-for-10, inclusive, as determined by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion; and

•	Proposal 5: Approval of the adjournment of the Annual Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of the Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal).

What if another matter is properly brought before the Annual Meeting?

The Board knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment. This discretionary authority is granted when you sign the form of proxy.

How do I vote?

The procedures for voting are as follows:

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote at the Annual Meeting, vote by proxy over the telephone, vote by proxy through the Internet or vote by proxy using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote online during the meeting even if you have already voted by proxy.

•

VOTE BY INTERNET: To vote through the Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the control number from the Notice, voting instruction form or proxy card. Your Internet vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on June 13, 2023 to be counted.

•

VOTE BY PHONE: To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice, voting instruction form or proxy card. Your telephone vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on June 13, 2023 to be counted.

•	VOTE BY PROXY CARD: To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the proxy card that may be delivered to you and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.

•	VOTE DURING MEETING: To vote online during the Annual Meeting, follow the provided instructions to join the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BNGO2023, starting at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time on Wednesday, June 14, 2023.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank, dealer or other agent, you should have received the Notice or voting instruction form containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from us. Simply follow the voting instructions in the Notice or voting instruction form to ensure that your vote is counted. Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or over the Internet as instructed by your broker or bank. To vote online during the Annual Meeting, you will need the16-digit control number included on your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

Internet proxy voting may be provided to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your Internet access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies.

Can I vote my shares by filling out and returning the Notice?

No. The Notice identifies the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, but you cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote through the Internet, by telephone, by using a printed proxy card or by submitting a ballot online during the Annual Meeting.

If I am a stockholder of record and I do not vote, or if I return a proxy card or otherwise vote without giving specific voting instructions, what happens?

If you are a stockholder of record and do not vote by completing your proxy card, by telephone, through the Internet or online during the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted.

If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote without marking voting selections, your shares will be voted, as applicable, “For” the election of all three nominees for director under the Director Election Proposal, “For” the Say-On-Pay Proposal, “For” the Auditor Ratification Proposal, “For” the Reverse Stock Split Proposal and, if necessary, “For” the Adjournment Proposal. If any other matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his or her best judgment.

If I am a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and I do not provide my broker or bank with voting instructions, what happens?

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you do not instruct your broker how to vote your shares, the question of whether your broker will still be able to vote your shares depends on whether the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) deems the particular proposal to be a “routine” matter. Although our shares are not listed with the NYSE, the NYSE regulates broker-dealers and their discretion to vote on stockholder proposals. Under the NYSE rules applicable to brokers and other similar organizations that are subject to NYSE rules, such organizations may use their discretion to vote your “uninstructed shares” with respect to matters considered to be “routine” under NYSE rules, but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under such rules and interpretations, non-routine matters are matters that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of stockholders, such as mergers, stockholder proposals, elections of directors (even if not contested), executive compensation (including any advisory stockholder votes on executive compensation and on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation), and certain corporate governance proposals, even if management-supported. In this regard, the NYSE has advised us that Proposal 1 (the Director Election Proposal) and Proposal 2 (the Say-on-Pay Proposal) should each be considered “non-routine” and, accordingly, we believe that your broker may not vote your shares on such proposals without your instructions. The NYSE has also advised us that Proposal 3 (the Auditor Ratification Proposal), Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal) and Proposal 5 (the Adjournment Proposal) should each be considered “routine” and, accordingly, we believe that your broker may vote your shares on such proposals without instructions from you. Nevertheless, whether a proposal is “routine” or “non-routine” remains subject to the final determination of the NYSE. If your shares are held by a bank, we believe your shares cannot be voted without your specific instructions.

Accordingly, if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would prefer, you must provide voting instructions to your broker or bank by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your broker or bank.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

Bionano will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks, dealers and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. In addition, we have engaged Morrow Sodali LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies and provide related advice and informational support, for a services fee and the reimbursement of customary disbursements, which are not expected to exceed $20,000 in total. If you have any questions regarding this proxy statement, you may contact Morrow Sodali LLC at (203) 561-6945.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on each Notice to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of the following ways:

•	You may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date.

•	You may grant a subsequent proxy by telephone or through the Internet.

•	You may send a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy to: Secretary of Bionano Genomics, Inc., 9540 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121.

•

You may vote during the Annual Meeting which will be hosted via the Internet. Simply attending the Annual Meeting online will not, by itself, revoke your proxy. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online, we recommend that you also submit your proxy or voting instructions or vote by telephone or through the Internet so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting online.

Your most current proxy card or telephone or Internet proxy is the one that is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank

If your shares are held by your broker or bank, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker or bank.

When are stockholder proposals and director nominations due for next year’s Annual Meeting?

To be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting, your proposal must be submitted in writing by December 30, 2023, to: Secretary of Bionano Genomics, Inc., 9540 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121. If you wish to submit a proposal (including a director nomination) that is not to be included in the Company’s proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting, you must do so between February 15, 2024 and March 16, 2024. You are also advised to review the Company’s amended and restated bylaws (the “Bylaws”), which contain additional requirements relating to advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our Board’s nominees must also comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

What are “broker non-votes”?

When a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker holding the shares as to how to vote on matters deemed to be “non-routine” under NYSE rules, the broker cannot vote the shares. These unvoted shares with respect to “non-routine” matters are counted as “broker non-votes.”

As a reminder, if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, in order to ensure your shares are voted in the way you would prefer, you must provide voting instructions to your broker or bank by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your broker or bank.

How are votes counted?

Each share of our common stock you own entitles you to one vote. The inspector of elections will count votes for the meeting.

With respect to Proposal 1 (the Director Election Proposal), the inspector of elections will separately count votes “For,” “Withhold” and, if applicable, broker non-votes. Stockholders do not affirmatively vote “Against” nominees. Instead, if you do not want to elect a particular nominee, you should choose to “Withhold” a vote in favor of the applicable nominee and the inspector of elections will count each “Withhold” vote for each nominee. Because our Bylaws provide for a plurality vote standard for Proposal 1 (Director Election Proposal), only votes “For” a nominee will affect the outcome of the vote.

With respect to Proposal 2 (the Say-On-Pay Proposal), Proposal 3 (the Auditor Ratification Proposal), Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal) and Proposal 5 (the Adjournment Proposal), the inspector of elections will separately count votes “For” and “Against,” abstentions and, as applicable, broker non-votes.

Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total and will have the same effect as “Against” votes for Proposal 2 (the Say-On-Pay Proposal), Proposal 3 (the Auditor Ratification Proposal), Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal) and Proposal 5 (the Adjournment Proposal). You will not have the option to abstain from Proposal 1 (the Director Election Proposal).

We believe that broker non-votes will be counted towards the presence of a quorum but will have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for Proposal 1 (the Director Election Proposal) and Proposal 2 (the Say-On-Pay Proposal) because we have been advised by the NYSE that these proposals should be considered “non-routine” under NYSE rules, and accordingly, we believe that your broker may not vote your shares on such proposals without instructions from you. In the event any broker non-votes are received on Proposal 1 (the Director Election Proposal), they will have no effect on such proposal because the voting standard on Proposal 1 (the Director Election Proposal) counts only votes cast and a broker non-vote is not a vote cast under Delaware law. In the event any broker non-votes are received on Proposal 2 (the Say-On-Pay Proposal), they will have no effect because broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote on such proposal under Delaware law. We do not anticipate broker non-votes for Proposal 3 (the Auditor Ratification Proposal), Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal) and Proposal 5 (the Adjournment Proposal) because we have been advised by the NYSE that these proposals should be considered “routine” under NYSE rules, and accordingly, we believe that your broker may vote your shares on such proposals without instructions from you; however, to the extent there are broker non-votes for Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal), we believe such broker non-votes will be counted as votes “Against” such proposals. With respect to Proposal 3 (the Auditor Ratification Proposal) and Proposal 5 (the Adjournment Proposal), we believe broker non-votes will have no effect because they are not considered entitled to vote on such proposals under Delaware law. Nevertheless, whether a proposal is “routine” or “non-routine” remains subject to the final determination of the NYSE. If your shares are held by a bank, we believe your shares cannot be voted without your specific instructions.

How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?

The following table summarizes the minimum vote needed to approve each proposal and the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes.

Director Election Proposal

Nominees receiving the most “For” votes from the holders of shares of our common stock present by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting; “Withhold” votes will have no effect; the Series A Preferred Stock is not entitled to vote on this proposal.

No effect

Say-on-Pay Proposal

“For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares of our common stock present by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting; the Series A Preferred Stock is not entitled to vote on this proposal.

Against

No effect

Auditor Ratification Proposal

Against

No effect⁽¹⁾

Reverse Stock Split Proposal

“For” votes from the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock and the one share of Series A Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class.

Against⁽²⁾

Against⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

Adjournment Proposal

Against

No effect⁽¹⁾

(1)

NYSE has advised us that this proposal should be considered a “routine” matter under NYSE rules. Although our shares are not listed with the NYSE, the NYSE regulates broker-dealers and their discretion to vote on stockholder proposals. If your shares are held by a bank, we believe your shares cannot be voted without your specific instructions. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker that holds your shares, we believe your broker should have discretionary authority under NYSE rules to vote your shares on this proposal absent additional instructions from you. Given such discretionary authority, we do not anticipate broker non-votes for this proposal.

(2)

Although abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will technically have the same effect as “Against” votes, because the share of Series A Preferred Stock has 3,000,000,000 votes and will vote in a manner that mirrors votes actually cast (which does not include abstentions or broker non-votes), abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have virtually no effect on the outcome of the Reverse Stock Split Proposal. Therefore, if you do not wish for the Reverse Stock Split Proposal to pass, you should vote “Against” this proposal.

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold the Annual Meeting. The presence, by virtual attendance or by proxy, of the holders of one-third in voting power of the shares of common stock and Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date and entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 306,555,707 shares of common stock

outstanding and entitled to vote and one share of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding. Thus, in addition to the presence of the Series A Preferred Stock at the meeting, the holders of 102,185,236 shares of common stock must be present by virtual attendance or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting to have a quorum.

In addition, unless at least one-third of the shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date are present by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy, the holder of Series A Preferred Stock will not cast any votes on the Reverse Stock Split Proposal.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank, dealer or other agent) or if you vote online during the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the chair of the Annual Meeting or the holders of a majority of shares of our common stock present by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy may adjourn the Annual Meeting to another date.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an additional Form 8-K to publish the final results.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, relating to future events, including, without limitation, our beliefs regarding the determinations of NYSE with respect to the proposals in this proxy statement. Such statements are only predictions and involve risks and uncertainties, resulting in the possibility that the actual events or performance will differ materially from such predictions. For a nonexclusive list of major factors which could cause the actual results to differ materially from the predicted results in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of the Annual Report and in our subsequent periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board is divided into three classes. Each class consists, as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total number of directors, and each class has a three-year term. Vacancies on the Board may be filled only by persons elected by a majority of the remaining directors. A director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy in a class, including vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors, shall serve for the remainder of the full term of that class and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified.

At this time, the Board believes that the classified board structure is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The classified board structure and corresponding three-year terms are intended to ensure that our directors have sufficient institutional knowledge of our business, corporate strategy and corporate objectives while also allowing for corporate continuity and stability of the Board, promoting the balance of long-term and short-term interests of the Company and its stockholders. Our Board believes a three-year term in office also allows our directors to stay focused on long-term value creation. Further, our Board believes that a classified board structure enables us to attract and retain diverse and highly qualified individuals willing to commit the time and dedication necessary to understand our business, its operations and its competitive environment. For example, a substantial amount of diversity on our Board is represented by directors who have joined our Board in the last three years. The structure also safeguards us from third-party takeover attempts, as it will require a longer period to change majority control of the Board.

The Board presently has nine members. There are three Class II directors whose term of office expire in 2023: Albert Luderer, Ph.D., Kristiina Vuori, M.D., Ph.D. and Hannah Mamuszka. Proxies may not be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this proxy statement. Each of the nominees is currently a director of the Company who was previously elected by the stockholders. Each of Dr. Luderer, Dr. Vuori and Ms. Mamuszka was recommended for nomination to the Board by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”). If elected at the Annual Meeting, each of these nominees would serve until the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or, if sooner, until the director’s death, resignation or removal. It is the Company’s policy to encourage nominees for directors to attend the Annual Meeting. Five of the directors attended the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Vote Required

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes of the holders of shares present by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Accordingly, the three nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes will be elected. Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of Dr. Luderer, Dr. Vuori and Ms. Mamuszka. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, shares that would have been voted for that nominee will instead be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by the Company. Each of Dr. Luderer, Dr. Vuori and Ms. Mamuszka has agreed to serve if elected. The Company’s management has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.

The Series A Preferred Stock is not entitled to vote on this proposal. You will not have the option to abstain from this proposal. We believe that broker non-votes will be counted towards the presence of a quorum but will have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for this proposal because we have been advised by NYSE that this proposal should be considered “non-routine” under NYSE rules, and accordingly, we believe that your broker may not vote your shares on such proposal without instructions from you. Nevertheless, whether a proposal is “routine” or “non-routine” remains subject to the final determination of NYSE. If your shares are held by a bank, we believe your shares cannot be voted without your specific instructions.

NOMINEES

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to assemble a board that, as a whole, possesses the appropriate balance of professional and industry knowledge, financial expertise and high-level management experience necessary to oversee and direct the Company’s business. To that end, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has identified and evaluated nominees in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition, with the goal of recruiting members who complement and strengthen the skills of

other members and who also exhibit integrity, collegiality, sound business judgment and other qualities that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee views as critical to the effective functioning of the Board. To provide a mix of experience and perspective on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also seeks to attain diversity and balance among directors of race, ethnicity, gender, age, geography, thought, viewpoints, and backgrounds. The brief biographies below include information, as of the date of this proxy statement, regarding the specific and particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of each director or nominee that led the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to recommend that nominee should he or she continue to serve on the Board. However, each of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may have a variety of reasons why he or she believes a particular person would be an appropriate nominee for the Board, and these views may differ from the views of other members.

The following table sets forth, for the Class II nominees and our other directors who will continue in office after the Annual Meeting, their ages and position/office held with us as of the date of this proxy statement:

Name	Age	Position/Office Held With the Company
Class I directors, whose terms will expire at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
R. Erik Holmlin, Ph.D.	55	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
David L. Barker, Ph.D.⁽¹⁾⁽⁴⁾	81	Chairman, Director
Vincent J. Wong, J.D., M.B.A.⁽²⁾	51	Director

Class II directors for election at the Annual Meeting
Albert Luderer, Ph.D.^(2)(3)(4)	74	Director
Kristiina Vuori, M.D., Ph.D.^(1)(3)(4)	55	Director
Hannah Mamuszka⁽¹⁾	46	Director

Class III directors whose terms will expire at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Christopher Twomey⁽²⁾	63	Director
Yvonne Linney, Ph.D.⁽³⁾	61	Director
Aleksandar Rajkovic, M.D., Ph.D.⁽⁴⁾	59	Director

(1)	Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”)

(2)	Member of the Audit Committee

(3)	Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

(4)	Member of Science & Technology Committee

Set forth below is biographical information for the nominees and each person whose term of office as a director will continue after the Annual Meeting. This includes information regarding each director’s experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led our Board to recommend them for board service.

CLASS II DIRECTORS NOMINEES FOR ELECTION FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING AT THE 2026 ANNUAL MEETING

Albert Luderer, Ph.D. Dr. Luderer has served on our board of directors since October 2011. Since September 2013, Dr. Luderer has served as the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of Indi Molecular, Inc., a private synthetic antibody technology company. He has also served as the Executive Chairman of the board of directors of Prostate Management Diagnostics Inc., a non-profit cancer research company, since January 2016, and as the Chairman of the board of directors and member of the compensation committee of AllerGenis, LLC, a private diagnostic company, since September 2021. Dr. Luderer previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Integrated Diagnostics, Inc., a private molecular diagnostics company, from March 2010 to June 2018, when it was sold to Biodesix, Inc. Dr. Luderer has over 30 years of experience in executive leadership roles in the areas of technology development, operations and business development. Dr. Luderer received his B.A. in Zoology from Drew University and his M.S. in Immunochemistry and Ph.D. in Immunogenics from Rutgers University.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Dr. Luderer’s experience in the biotechnology sector, with special focuses on technology, business development and commercialization, qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board.

Kristiina Vuori, M.D., Ph.D. Dr. Vuori has served on our board of directors since May 2019. Since January 1995, Dr. Vuori has served as Professor, and since January 2010 as Pauline and Stanley Foster Distinguished Chair, at the National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Center of Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, or the Institute, a non-profit research organization with programs in cancer, neurodegeneration, diabetes, and infectious, inflammatory, and childhood diseases. In addition, Dr. Vuori served as President and member of the board of directors of the Institute from January 2010 to June 2022, and as the Institute’s interim CEO from January 2013 to September 2014, and from September 2017 to June 2020. She served as the Institute’s EVP for Scientific Affairs in 2008-2010, as Director of the Cancer Center in 2005-2013, and as Deputy Director of the Cancer Center in 2003-2005. Dr. Vuori has also served as a member of the board of directors of Inhibrx, Inc., a public biotechnology company, since October 2021, of Forian, Inc., a public health data analytics company, since March 2021, and of Sio Gene Therapies, Inc., a public gene therapy company, since October 2020. In addition, Dr. Vuori served on the board of directors of WebMD from July 2014 to September 2017 (when it was acquired by KKR & Co. Inc.) and of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, a governmental research institute, from January 2011 to December 2022. Dr. Vuori earned her M.D. and Ph.D. from the University of Oulu, Finland.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Dr. Vuori’s experience in biomedical research and as an educator of research scientists, her experience managing a large non-profit research organization, and her various leadership roles qualify her to serve on our Board.

Hannah Mamuszka. Ms. Mamuszka has served on our board of directors since May 2020. Since March 2016, Ms. Mamuszka has served as Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Alva10, Inc., a private market access strategy firm. Ms. Mamuszka has also served as an advisory board member of Carolina Health Informatics Program (CHIP), an interdisciplinary research and training program at the University of North Carolina, since January 2021 and served as a member of the board of directors of Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., a private cardiac imaging company, from May 2021 to June 2022 (when it was acquired by Thomas Bravo). Ms. Mamuszka also served as an Executive Director of Precision Care Alliance, a non-profit focused on policy reform to enable diagnostic development, from April 2019 to May 2020. Additionally, from December 2010 to June 2015, she served as Vice President of Business Development and Clinical Strategy at Exosome Diagnostics, Inc., a private company developing liquid biopsy tests. Prior to joining Exosome, Ms. Mamuszka served as Director of Strategic Business Development, Companion Diagnostics at Asuragen, Inc., a private company focused on diagnostics and therapeutics. From January 2005 to January 2010, Ms. Mamuszka served in various director level positions, most recently as Global Director for Pharmaceutical Services, at Oncotech Inc., then by acquisition, at Exiqon A/S. Ms. Mamuszka has previously held various laboratory positions at ArQule, Inc., Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Organogenesis, Inc. and the National Cancer Institute. Ms. Mamuszka received her B.S. in neurobiology and physiology from the University of Maryland at College Park and her M.S. in molecular biology from Harvard University.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Ms. Mamuszka’s over 20 years of experience in the life sciences industry, extensive experience with diagnostics and various leadership roles qualify her to serve as a member of our Board.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” EACH NAMED NOMINEE FOR PROPOSAL 1.

CLASS III DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE UNTIL THE 2024 ANNUAL MEETING

Christopher J. Twomey. Mr. Twomey has served on our board of directors since July 2018. Since August 2013, Mr. Twomey has served as a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., a public medical device company. From March 1990 to June 2007, Mr. Twomey served in various roles, including as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, at Biosite Incorporated, a medical diagnostics company. From October 1981 to March 1990, Mr. Twomey served as an audit manager for Ernst & Young, LLP. Mr. Twomey served as a director of Senomyx, Inc., a taste technologies company, from March 2006 to November 2018 (when it was acquired by Firmenich SA). From July 2006 to March 2014, Mr. Twomey also served as a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company that was acquired by Mallinckrodt plc in 2014. Mr. Twomey received his B.A. in Business Economics from the University of California at Santa Barbara.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Mr. Twomey’s substantial leadership skills and expertise in accounting and financial reporting qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board, and that such skills are especially valuable in his role as Chairman of our Audit Committee.

Yvonne Linney, Ph.D. Dr. Linney has served on our board of directors since May 2020. Since January 2019, Dr. Linney has served as Principal at Linney BioConsulting, a private strategy development firm. Dr. Linney has also served as a member of the board of Sengenics Corporation, a private company developing tools for immunoprofiling for biodiscovery since January 2023. From January 2021 to September 2022, Dr. Linney served as Chief Operating Officer and member of the board of directors of Artificial, Inc., a private laboratory automation optimization software company, where she also served as a strategic advisor from September 2020 to January 2021. Dr. Linney has also served as a strategic advisor at the California Life Sciences Institute, a private life sciences membership organization, since March 2019, as a Boardroom Ready Member at Women in Bio, a private professional organization, since July 2019, and as a strategic advisor at Tag.bio, a private data science platform company, since January 2019. From December 2016 to November 2018, Dr. Linney served as the Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of directors of Transcriptic, Inc. (now Strateos, Inc.), a private robotic and cloud laboratory platform company, where she had previously served as Chief Operating Officer since October 2015. In addition, from November 2006 to January 2015, Dr. Linney served as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Life Science Solutions at Agilent Technologies, Inc., a public life sciences and diagnostics company. Prior to joining Agilent, Dr. Linney served as Director of Molecular Diagnostics and Global Strategic Marketing at Bayer Diagnostics (now part of Siemens Healthcare) from 2005 to 2006 and Senior Director, Marketing and Product Management at Caliper Life Sciences from 2003 to 2005. Dr. Linney holds a B.S. in Microbiology and Virology from Warwick University, UK, and a Ph.D. in Genetics from Leicester University, UK.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Dr. Linney’s over 30 years of experience in leadership roles in the life sciences and diagnostics industries qualify her to serve as a member of our Board.

Aleksandar Rajkovic, M.D., Ph.D. Dr. Rajkovic has served on our board of directors since February 2022. Since May 2018, Dr. Rajkovic has served as Chief Genomics Officer and Director of the Genomic Medicine Initiative at University of California San Francisco (“UCSF”). Dr. Rajkovic also serves as Medical Director and Chief of the Center for Genetic and Genomic Medicine for the UCSF Health System, serves as the Stuart Lindsay Distinguished Professor in Experimental Pathology at UCSF, serves on the board of directors for the American College of Medical Genetics Foundation, since April 2020, and on the scientific advisory board of Allelica, a private genomics software company, since February 2022. From July 2009 to May 2018, Dr. Rajkovic served as the Marcus Allen Hogge Chair in Reproductive Sciences and director of reproductive genetics at the Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Dr. Rajkovic holds a B.S. in Chemistry from Johns Hopkins University and an M.D. and Ph.D. in Molecular Biology from Case Western Reserve University.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Dr. Rajkovic’s extensive experience in the clinical application of genetic and genomic testing qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board.

CLASS I DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE UNTIL THE 2025 ANNUAL MEETING

R. Erik Holmlin, Ph.D. Dr. Holmlin has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our board of directors since January 2011. Dr. Holmlin has also served as a member of the board of directors of Innovatus Life Sciences Acquisition Corp, a blank check company seeking to effect a business combination with one or more businesses, since March 2021. From June 2010 to February 2011, Dr. Holmlin served as president and Chief Executive Officer of GenVault Corporation, a private biosample management solutions company. Previously, Dr. Holmlin held positions as an entrepreneur in residence at Domain Associates, LLC, a dedicated life sciences venture capital firm; Chief Commercial Officer of Exiqon A/S, a publicly traded RNA research solutions company; founder and executive at GeneOhm Sciences, Inc., which was acquired by Becton, Dickinson and Company; and a National Institutes of Health postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University. Dr. Holmlin received his B.S. in Chemistry from Occidental College, his Ph.D. in Chemistry from the California Institute of Technology and MBAs from University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Dr. Holmlin’s over 18 years of experience in the life sciences and healthcare industries, which includes the areas of technology development, product commercialization and venture financing, qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

David L. Barker, Ph.D. Dr. Barker has served on our board of directors since May 2010, and as Chairman of our board of directors since August 2016. Dr. Barker has also served as a member of the board of directors of AmideBio, LLC, a private biotechnology company, since August 2011, and of Singular Genomics Systems, Inc., a public life science technology company, since June 2016. He has also served as a scientific advisor to LunaPBC, a public benefit corporation, since November 2017. Dr. Barker previously served as a member of the board of directors of Aspen Neuroscience, a private cell therapy company, from October 2018 to May 2021, IntegenX, Inc., a private DNA testing technology company, from June 2006 to March 2018 (when it was acquired by Thermo Fisher Scientific), and of Integrated Diagnostics, Inc., a private molecular diagnostics company, from October 2009 to August 2018 (when it was acquired by Biodesix, Inc.). He served as Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer at Illumina, Inc. (“Illumina”) from 2000 to 2007, and on the Illumina scientific advisory board until May 2016. Dr. Barker was previously a member of the board of directors of NextBio, Inc. (acquired by Illumina in 2013), ProteinSimple, Inc. (acquired by Bio-Techne Corporation (“BT”) in 2014) and Zephyrus Biosciences, Inc. (acquired by BT in 2016). Dr. Barker served from 1998 to 2000 as Vice President and Chief Science Advisor at Amersham Biosciences, now part of GE Healthcare. From 1988 to 1998, Dr. Barker held senior positions, including Vice President of Research and Business Development, at Molecular Dynamics, Inc., until the acquisition of Molecular Dynamics by Amersham. In his academic career, Dr. Barker conducted interdisciplinary research in neurobiology as a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard Medical School, Assistant Professor at the University of Oregon and Associate Professor at Oregon State University. Dr. Barker holds a B.S. with honors in Chemistry from the California Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from Brandeis University.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Dr. Barker’s extensive experience in managing and leading early stage and established companies within the clinical diagnostic and biotechnology industries qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board.

Vincent J. Wong, J.D., M.B.A. Mr. Wong has served on our board of directors since December 2021. Since March 2021, Mr. Wong has served as Chief Commercial Officer at Geneoscopy, Inc., a private company developing diagnostic tests for gastrointestinal health. Mr. Wong has also served as an Executive in Residence at IU Ventures, an affiliate of Indiana University advising portfolio start-up companies, since March 2021. From April 2005 to December 2020, Mr. Wong served in various leadership roles at Roche Diagnostics Corporation, the diagnostics division of Roche Holding AG and its affiliated entities, including as Vice President of Sales, Point of Care Diagnostics, Vice President, Physician Office and Specialty Diagnostics, and Vice President, Strategy and Communications. Mr. Wong holds a B.A. in Economics and Government from the University of Notre Dame, a J.D. from Indiana University Maurer School of Law and an MBA from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board believe that Mr. Wong’s extensive experience in leadership roles in the diagnostics industry qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board.

INFORMATION REGARDING

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

INDEPENDENCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Under the listing requirements and rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), independent directors must comprise a majority of our board of directors. In addition, the rules of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Under the rules of the Nasdaq, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Compensation Committee members must not have a relationship with us that is material to the director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a Compensation Committee member. Additionally, Audit Committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee of the board of directors or any other board committee, accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries or be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of the directors and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning such director’s background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors determined that each of Dr. Barker, Mr. Wong, Dr. Luderer, Dr. Vuori, Ms. Mamuszka, Mr. Twomey, Dr. Linney and Dr. Rajkovic, representing eight of our nine directors, are “independent directors” as defined under current rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq. In making these determinations, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances that our Board deemed relevant in determining their independence.

BOARD DIVERSITY

The Board Diversity Matrix below provides certain self-identified information regarding the composition of the Board. Each of the categories listed in the below table has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f) and related instructions.

Board Diversity Matrix (As of the Record Date)
Total Number of Directors	9
	Female	Male	Non-Binary	Did Not Disclose Gender
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors	3	6	—	—
Part II: Demographic Background
African American or Black	—	—	—	—
Alaskan Native or Native American	—	—	—	—
Asian	—	1	—	—
Hispanic or Latinx	—	1	—	—
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander	—	—	—	—
White	3	3	—	—
Two or More Races or Ethnicities	—	—	—	—
LGBTQ+	—
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background	1

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board has an independent Chairman, Dr. Barker, who has authority, among other things, to call and preside over Board meetings, including meetings of the independent directors, to set meeting agendas and to determine materials to be distributed to the Board. Accordingly, the Chairman has substantial ability to shape the work of the Board. We believe that separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer reinforces the independence of the Board in its oversight of our business and affairs. In addition, we have a separate chair for each committee of the Board. The chair of each committee is expected to report annually to our Board on the activities of their committee in fulfilling their responsibilities as detailed in their respective charters or specify any shortcomings should that be the case. In addition, we believe that having an independent Chairman creates an environment that is more conducive to objective evaluation and oversight of management’s performance, increasing management accountability and improving the ability of the Board to monitor whether management’s actions are in the best interests of us and our stockholders. As a result, we believe that having an independent Board Chairman can enhance the effectiveness of the Board as a whole.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SUCCESSION AND BOARD REFRESHMENT

Under the charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board changes as needed to the Company’s corporate governance principles, including items such as management succession, policies and principles for management selection and performance review, policies regarding succession in the event of an emergency or departure of our Chief Executive Officer, and Board diversity, tenure and refreshment. Our Board has adopted an emergency succession plan in the event of the sudden departure of our Chief Executive Officer and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews it with our management annually. Our corporate governance principles provide, among other things, that our Compensation Committee is to conduct an annual review of the performance of our Chief Executive Officer. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board seek to achieve a balance of Board director tenures in order to benefit from long-tenured directors’ institutional knowledge and newly elected directors’ fresh perspective and, towards this goal, monitors director tenure carefully. The Board believes an effective refreshment program must be continuous and ongoing as discussed below in “Information Regarding Committees of the Board of Directors—Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.”

ROLE OF THE BOARD IN RISK OVERSIGHT

Risk is inherent with every business, and we face a number of risks, including strategic, financial, business and operational, legal and compliance, cybersecurity and reputational. One of the key functions of our Board is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of the Board that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, including a determination of the nature and level of risk appropriate for the Company. Our Audit Committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The Audit Committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in addition to oversight of the performance of our internal audit function. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines, including whether they are successful in preventing illegal or improper liability-creating conduct. Our Compensation Committee assesses and monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. It is the responsibility of the committee chairs to report findings regarding material risk exposures to the Board as quickly as possible. The Chairman coordinates between the Board and management with regard to the determination and implementation of responses to any problematic risk management issues.

MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board met seven times during the last fiscal year. Each Board member attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served, that were held in 2022 during the period in which he or she served on our Board or their respective committees of our Board.

As required under the Nasdaq listing standards, in 2022, our independent directors met 5 times in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors were present.

INFORMATION REGARDING COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board has four standing committees: an Audit Committee; a Compensation Committee; a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and a Science and Technology Committee. The following table provides membership and meeting information for fiscal year 2022 for each of these committees of the Board:

R. Erik Holmlin, Ph.D.

David L. Barker, Ph.D.

Yvonne Linney, Ph.D.

Albert Luderer, Ph.D.

Hannah Mamuszka

Christopher Twomey

Kristiina Vuori, M.D., Ph.D.

Vincent J. Wong, J.D., M.B.A.

Aleksandar Rajkovic, M.D., Ph.D.

Number of meetings in fiscal year 2022

*	Committee Chairperson

Below is a description of each committee of the Board.

Each of the committees has authority to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Board has determined that each member of each committee meets the applicable Nasdaq rules and regulations regarding “independence” and each member is free of any relationship that would impair his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to the Company.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee was established by the Board in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act to oversee the Company’s corporate accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of its financial statements. For this purpose, the Audit Committee performs several functions. The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to discharge the responsibilities of the Board with respect to the Company’s corporate accounting and financial reporting processes, systems of internal control over financial reporting and financial-statement audits, as well as overseeing the Company’s independent registered accounting firm. Specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee include, among other things:

•	helping the Board oversee the Company’s corporate accounting and financial reporting processes;

•	managing the selection, engagement, qualifications, independence and performance of a qualified firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements;

•	discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and the independent accountants, our interim and year-end operating results;

•	developing procedures for employees to submit concerns anonymously about questionable accounting or audit matters;

•	reviewing related person transactions;

•	obtaining and reviewing a report by the independent registered public accounting firm at least annually, that describes our internal quality control procedures, any material issues with such procedures, and any steps taken to deal with such issues when required by applicable law;

•	approving, or, as permitted, pre-approving, audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm;

•

reviewing and discussing with our management and our auditors, as appropriate, our guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including our major financial risk exposures and the steps taken by management to identify, monitor and control exposures to strategic, financial, operational, regulatory and other risks inherit in our business; and

•

reviewing reports from management and our auditors regarding the adequacy and effectiveness of our procedures to monitor and ensure compliance with our legal and regulatory responsibilities, including our disclosure controls and procedures, as well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and regarding legal matters and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that may have a material effect on our business, financial statements or compliance policies, including any material reports or inquiries from regulatory or governmental agencies.

The Audit Committee is currently composed of three directors: Mr. Twomey, Dr. Luderer and Mr. Wong. The Board has adopted a written Audit Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.bionano.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or the Annual Report.

The Board reviews the Nasdaq listing standards definition of independence for Audit Committee members on an annual basis and has determined that all members of the Company’s Audit Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(c)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act).

Each member of the Audit Committee can read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with applicable requirements. In arriving at these determinations, the Board has examined each Audit Committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of their employment in the corporate finance sector.

The chair of the Audit Committee is Mr. Twomey, who the Board has determined qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules. The Board made a qualitative assessment of Mr. Twomey’s level of knowledge and experience based on a number of factors, including his formal education, prior experience, business acumen and independence. In addition to the Company’s Audit Committee, Mr. Twomey also serves on the Audit Committee of Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. The Board has determined that this simultaneous service does not impair Mr. Twomey’s ability to effectively serve on the Audit Committee.

Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors*

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 with management of the Company. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

Mr. Twomey, Chair

Dr. Luderer

Mr. Wong

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is currently composed of three directors: Dr. Barker, Dr. Vuori and Ms. Mamuszka. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent as

defined in Rule 5605(d)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards and a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Board has adopted a written Compensation Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.bionano.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or the Annual Report.

The Compensation Committee acts on behalf of the Board to review, adopt or recommend to the Board for adoption and oversee the Company’s compensation strategy, policies, plans and programs and to review and determine the compensation to be paid to our executive officers, directors and other senior management, as appropriate. Specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include, among other things:

•	reviewing and approving the compensation of our chief executive officer, other executive officers and senior management;

•	reviewing and recommending to the Board the compensation paid to our directors;

•	reviewing and approving the compensation arrangements with our executive officers and other senior management;

•	administering our equity incentive plans and other benefit programs;

•	reviewing, adopting, amending and terminating, incentive compensation and equity plans, severance agreements, profit sharing plans, bonus plans, change-of-control protections and any other compensatory arrangements for our executive officers and other senior management; and

•	reviewing and establishing general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees, including our overall compensation philosophy.

Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures

Typically, the Compensation Committee meets at least twice per year and with greater frequency if necessary. The agenda for each meeting is usually developed by the Chair of the Compensation Committee, in consultation with management. The Compensation Committee meets regularly in executive session. However, from time to time, various members of management and other employees as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited by the Compensation Committee to make presentations, to provide financial or other background information or advice or to otherwise participate in Compensation Committee meetings. The Chief Executive Officer does not participate in and is not present during any deliberations or determinations of the Compensation Committee regarding his compensation or individual performance objectives. The charter of the Compensation Committee grants the Compensation Committee full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company. In addition, under its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to obtain, at the expense of the Company, advice and assistance from compensation consultants and internal and external legal, accounting or other advisors and other external resources that the Compensation Committee considers necessary or appropriate in the performance of its duties. The Compensation Committee has direct responsibility for the oversight of the work of any consultants or advisers engaged for the purpose of advising the Compensation Committee. In particular, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain, in its sole discretion, compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of executive and director compensation, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms. Under its charter, to the extent required by the SEC and Nasdaq rules, the Compensation Committee may select, or receive advice from, a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser to the Compensation Committee, other than in-house legal counsel and certain other types of advisers, only after taking into consideration six factors, prescribed by the SEC and Nasdaq, that bear upon the adviser’s independence; however, there is no requirement that any adviser be independent.

The Compensation Committee retains an independent executive compensation consultant to assist in evaluating our compensation programs. Until June 2022, Aon/Radford served as our compensation consultant, primarily with respect to our 2022 compensation program. In June 2022, after taking into consideration the six factors prescribed by the SEC and Nasdaq discussed above, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer as its compensation consultant with respect to our 2023 compensation program. Our Compensation Committee identified Pearl Meyer based on Pearl Meyer’s general reputation in the industry and experience providing similar services to companies similar to Bionano. The Compensation Committee requested that each of Aon/Radford and Pearl Meyer, with respect to our 2022 and 2023 compensation programs, respectively:

•	evaluate the efficacy of the Company’s compensation strategy and practices in supporting and reinforcing the Company’s long-term strategic goals;

•	assist in refining the Company’s compensation strategy and in developing and implementing an executive compensation program to execute that strategy;

•	develop a comparative group of companies and perform analyses of competitive performance and compensation levels for that group; and

•	examine competitiveness of equity compensation and retention value of the equity program.

At the request of the Compensation Committee, in 2022 Pearl Meyer also conducted individual interviews with members of the Compensation Committee and management to learn more about the Company’s business operations and strategy, key performance metrics and strategic goals, as well as the labor markets in which the Company competes. Pearl Meyer ultimately developed recommendations for our 2023 compensation program that were presented to the Compensation Committee for its consideration.

Under its charter, our Compensation Committee may form, and delegate authority to, subcommittees as appropriate. Our Compensation Committee approved the formation of an equity incentive subcommittee of the Compensation Committee, currently composed of R. Erik Holmlin, Ph.D., our Chief Executive Officer, to which authority has been delegated to grant, without any further action required by the Compensation Committee, stock options and time-based restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards to employees who are not our officers, within specified limits approved by our Compensation Committee. The purpose of this delegation of authority is to enhance the flexibility of equity award administration and to facilitate the timely grant of equity awards to non-management employees, particularly new employees, within specified limits approved by our Compensation Committee. In particular, the subcommittee may grant options or RSU awards only within pre-approved guidelines. Typically, as part of its oversight function, our Compensation Committee will review on a regular basis the list of grants made by the subcommittee. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the subcommittee exercised its authority to grant equity awards covering a total of 9,871,450 shares and 6,295,739 shares, respectively, to non-officer employees.

The Compensation Committee holds one or more meetings during the first quarter of the year to discuss and make recommendations to the Board for annual compensation adjustments, annual bonuses, annual equity awards, and current year corporate performance objectives. However, the Compensation Committee also considers matters related to individual compensation, such as compensation for new executive hires, as well as high-level strategic issues, such as the efficacy of the Company’s compensation strategy, potential modifications to that strategy and new trends, plans or approaches to compensation, at various meetings throughout the year. Generally, the Compensation Committee’s process comprises two related elements: the determination of compensation levels and the establishment of performance objectives for the current year. For executives other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee solicits and considers evaluations and recommendations submitted to the Compensation Committee by the Chief Executive Officer. In the case of the Chief Executive Officer, the evaluation of his performance is conducted by the Compensation Committee, which determines recommendations to the Board regarding any adjustments to his compensation as well as equity awards to be granted. For all executives and directors as part of its deliberations, the Compensation Committee may review and consider, as appropriate, materials such as financial reports and projections, operational data, executive and director stock ownership information, company stock performance data, analyses of historical executive compensation levels and current Company-wide compensation levels, compensation data from comparative companies, compensation surveys, and recommendations of any compensation consultant, if applicable.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, reviewing and evaluating candidates to serve as directors of the Company (consistent with criteria approved by the Board), reviewing and evaluating incumbent directors, selecting or recommending to the Board for selection candidates for election to the Board, making recommendations to the Board regarding the membership of the committees of the Board, assessing the performance of the Board, and developing a set of corporate governance principles for the Company.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently composed of three directors: Dr. Luderer, Dr. Vuori and Dr. Linney. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards, a non-employee director and free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of his independent judgment. The Board has adopted a written Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.bionano.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or the Annual Report.

The responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include, among other things:

•	identifying and evaluating candidates, including the nomination of incumbent directors for reelection and nominees recommended by stockholders, to serve on the Board;

•	considering and making recommendations to the Board regarding the composition and chairmanship of the committees of the Board, taking into account such factors as experience, skills and expertise;

•	instituting plans or programs for the continuing education of the Board and orientation of new directors;

•	developing and making recommendations to the Board regarding corporate governance guidelines and matters; and

•	overseeing periodic evaluations of the Board’s performance, including committees of the Board and management.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including the ability to read and understand basic financial statements, being over 21 years of age and having the highest personal integrity and ethics. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also intends to consider such factors as possessing relevant expertise upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to management, having sufficient time to devote to the affairs of the Company, demonstrated excellence in his or her field, having the ability to exercise sound business judgment and having the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. However, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains the right to modify these qualifications from time to time. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board, the operating requirements of the Company and the long-term interests of stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee typically considers diversity (including gender, racial and ethnic diversity), age, skills and such other factors as it deems appropriate, given the current needs of the Board and the Company, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee appreciates the value of thoughtful Board refreshment, and regularly identifies and considers qualities, skills and other director attributes that would enhance the composition of the Board. In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews these directors’ overall service to the Company during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any other relationships and transactions that might impair the directors’ independence. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also takes into account the results of the Board’s self-evaluation, conducted annually on a group and individual basis. In the case of new director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also determines whether the nominee is independent for Nasdaq purposes, which determination is based upon applicable Nasdaq listing standards, applicable SEC rules and regulations and the advice of counsel, if necessary. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then uses its network of contacts to compile a list of potential candidates, but may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates’ qualifications and then selects candidates for recommendation to the Board by majority vote.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy regarding board diversity. Diversity is one of a number of factors, however, that the committee takes into account in identifying nominees, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that it is essential that the board members represent diverse viewpoints. To accomplish the Board’s diversity objectives, the Nominating and

Corporate Governance Committee may retain an executive search firm to help identify potential directors that meet these objectives. In fiscal year 2022, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee paid a fee to $26,667 to assist in the process of identifying or evaluating director candidates.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the minimum criteria set forth above, based on whether or not the candidate was recommended by a stockholder. Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to become nominees for election to the Board may do so by delivering a written recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at the following address: Secretary of Bionano Genomics, Inc., 9540 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121, no later than the close of business on the 90^th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 120^th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Submissions must include the full name of the proposed nominee, a description of the proposed nominee’s business experience for at least the previous five years, complete biographical information, a description of the proposed nominee’s qualifications as a director and a representation that the nominating stockholder is a beneficial or record holder of the Company’s stock and has been a holder for at least one year. Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.

Science and Technology Committee

The Science and Technology Committee of the Board is responsible for overseeing matters relating to our scientific and technologic capabilities and development programs and monitoring and evaluating significant emerging trends and issues in science and technology relevant to us. The Science and Technology Committee is currently composed of four directors: Dr. Barker, Dr. Luderer, Dr. Vuori and Dr. Rajkovic.

The responsibilities of the Science and Technology Committee include, among other things:

•	assisting management in developing insights and recommendations for product development and technical innovation;

•	recommending external advisors for our use of science and technology;

•	assisting management in identifying, evaluating and overseeing technology and product development investments;

•	reviewing and overseeing out innovation strategy; and

•	overseeing our clinical development strategy and reviewing our intellectual property portfolio.

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

We are focused on elevating the health and wellness of all people through our products and services, as well as our Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) initiatives. We believe that ESG practices and sustainable long-term value creation for our stockholders are intertwined, and have committed to advancing an ESG framework that aligns with our culture and what we believe creates value for our investors. For more information about our ESG efforts please visit https://ir.bionano.com/responsibility. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or the Annual Report.

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

We consider our relationships with our stockholders to be a high priority. We recognize that stockholders can have divergent interests and different views on our practices, objectives and time horizons. To ensure that the Board and management have an opportunity to listen to and understand the varying perspectives of our stockholders, we engage in ongoing dialogues with stockholders through our stockholder engagement efforts. In 2022, members of management reached out to four of our largest stockholders, including stockholders collectively representing approximately 15% of the outstanding shares. Two such stockholder acknowledged our efforts but declined to meet with us, and we ultimately had constructive conversations with the other two, with one such stockholder also meeting with the Chair of the Board and of our Compensation Committee. Topics

discussed included, among other things, corporate governance (including Board member skills, experience and attributes), executive compensation, business strategy and environmental and other issues related to corporate social responsibility. As a result of these discussions, we gained understanding and insight into the views of these stockholders.

The Board has adopted a formal process by which stockholders may communicate with the Board or any of its directors. Stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board may do so by sending written communications addressed to: Secretary of Bionano Genomics, Inc., 9540 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121. These communications will be reviewed by the Secretary of Bionano, who will determine whether the communication is appropriate for presentation to the Board or the relevant director. The purpose of this screening is to allow the Board to avoid having to consider irrelevant or inappropriate communications (such as advertisements, solicitations and hostile communications). The screening procedures have been approved by a majority of the independent directors. All communications directed to the Audit Committee in accordance with our Open Door Policy for Reporting Complaints Regarding Accounting and Auditing Matters that relate to questionable accounting or auditing matters will be promptly and directly forwarded to the Audit Committee.

CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. This includes our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company’s website at www.bionano.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or the Annual Report. If we ever were to amend or waive any provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or any person performing similar functions, we intend to satisfy our disclosure obligations, if any, with respect to any such waiver or amendment by posting such information on our website set forth above rather than by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K.

HEDGING POLICY*

As part of our insider trading policy, no officer, director, other employee or consultant may engage in short sales, transactions in put or call options, hedging transactions or other inherently speculative transactions with respect to our common stock at any time. In addition, no officer, director, other employee or consultant may margin, or make any offer to margin, any of our common stock, including without limitation, borrowing against such stock, at any time.

*	The disclosure under the caption “Hedging Policy” is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

At the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders indicated their preference that we solicit a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay vote,” every year. The Board has adopted a policy that is consistent with that preference. In accordance with that policy, this year, we are again asking the stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules.

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. The compensation of our named executive officers subject to the vote is disclosed in the compensation tables and the related narrative disclosure contained in this proxy statement. As discussed in those disclosures, we believe that our compensation policies and decisions are consistent with current market practices. Compensation of our named executive officers is designed to enable us to attract and retain talented and experienced executives to lead us successfully in a competitive environment. Please also refer to “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Stockholder Engagement and Communications with the Board of Directors” for a discussion of our engagement with stockholders following the last year’s vote by our stockholders regarding the compensation of our named executive officers.

Accordingly, the Board is asking the stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by casting a non-binding advisory vote “For” the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to Bionano’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the compensation tables and any related material disclosed in this proxy statement, is hereby APPROVED.”

Because the vote is advisory, it is not binding on the Board or us. Nevertheless, the views expressed by our stockholders, whether through this vote or otherwise, are important to management and the Board and, accordingly, the Board and the Compensation Committee intend to consider the results of this vote in making determinations in the future regarding executive compensation arrangements.

Advisory approval of this proposal requires “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares of our common stock present by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting. The Series A Preferred Stock is not entitled to vote on this proposal. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total and will have the same effect as “Against” votes for this proposal. We believe that broker non-votes will be counted towards the presence of a quorum but will have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for this proposal because we have been advised by NYSE that this proposal should be considered “non-routine” under NYSE rules, and accordingly, we believe that your broker may not vote your shares on this proposal without instructions from you. Nevertheless, whether a proposal is “routine” or “non-routine” remains subject to the final determination of NYSE. If your shares are held by a bank, we believe your shares cannot be voted without your specific instructions.

Unless the Board decides to modify its policy regarding the frequency of soliciting advisory votes on the compensation of our named executives, the next scheduled say-on-pay vote will be at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We anticipate that our next advisory vote on the preferred frequency of stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers will occur at the 2028 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Section 14A of the Exchange Act, unless the Board determines to hold such advisory vote at an earlier meeting.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 2.

PROPOSAL 3

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has selected BDO USA, LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 and our Board has further directed that management submit the Audit Committee’s selection of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. Representatives of BDO USA, LLP are expected to be present by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Neither the Company’s Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of BDO USA, LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Vote Required

Approval of this proposal requires “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares of our common stock present by virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the Annual Meeting. The Series A Preferred Stock is not entitled to vote on this proposal. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total and will have the same effect as “Against” votes for this proposal. We do not anticipate broker non-votes for this proposal because we have been advised by NYSE that this proposal should be considered “routine” under NYSE rules, and accordingly, we believe that your broker may vote your shares on this proposal without instructions from you; however, to the extent there are broker non-votes for this proposal, we believe such broker non-votes will have no effect because they are not considered entitled to vote on this proposal under Delaware law. Nevertheless, whether a proposal is “routine” or “non-routine” remains subject to the final determination of NYSE. If your shares are held by a bank, we believe your shares cannot be voted without your specific instructions.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to the Company by BDO USA, LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

	2022	2021
Audit fees⁽¹⁾	$726,775	$888,296
Audit-related fees⁽²⁾	—	—
Tax fees⁽³⁾	—	$16,000
All other fees	—	—
Total	$726,775	$904,296

(1)

Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the consolidated annual financial statements of the Company, review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, review of SEC-filings, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)	Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the consolidated financial statements of the Company and are not reported under “Audit fees.”

(3)	Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, advice and planning. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, these services included assistance regarding federal and state tax compliance and consultations regarding various income tax issues.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, all of the total hours expended on our financial audit by BDO USA, LLP were provided by BDO USA, LLP’s full-time permanent employees.

PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

In considering the nature of the services provided by BDO USA, LLP, the Audit Committee determined that such services were compatible with the provision of independent audit services.

The Audit Committee discussed these services with BDO USA, LLP and management to determine that they were permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC to implement the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee required that all services performed by BDO USA, LLP be pre-approved prior to the services being performed. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, all services by BDO USA, LLP, respectively, were pre-approved in accordance with these procedures, and the Audit Committee continues to require that all services performed by BDO USA, LLP be pre-approved in accordance with these procedures prior to the services being performed.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 3.

PROPOSAL 4

REVERSE STOCK SPLIT PROPOSAL

General

Our Board has unanimously approved a series of alternate amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, each of which would effect a reverse stock split (a “Reverse Stock Split”) of all issued and outstanding shares of our common stock at a ratio ranging from 1-for-5 to 1-for-10, inclusive.

Accordingly, effecting a Reverse Stock Split would reduce the number of outstanding shares of our common stock. The effectiveness of any one of these amendments and the abandonment of the other amendments, or the abandonment of all of these amendments, will be determined by our Board following the Annual Meeting and on or prior to the one-year anniversary of the date each Reverse Stock Split is approved by our stockholders. Our Board has recommended that these proposed amendments be presented to our stockholders for approval.

Our stockholders are being asked to approve these proposed amendments pursuant to Proposal 4, and to grant authorization to our Board to determine, at its option, whether to implement a Reverse Stock Split, including its specific timing and ratio. Should we receive the required stockholder approval for Proposal 4, our Board will have the sole authority to elect, at any time on or prior to the one-year anniversary of the date each Reverse Stock Split is approved by our stockholders, and without the need for any further action on the part of our stockholders whether to effect a Reverse Stock Split.

Notwithstanding approval of Proposal 4 by our stockholders, our Board may, at its sole option, abandon the proposed amendments and determine prior to the effectiveness of any filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware not to effect any Reverse Stock Split, as permitted under Section 242(c) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

By approving Proposal 4, our stockholders will: (a) approve a series of alternate amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, pursuant to which any whole number of outstanding shares of common stock between and including 1-for-5 to 1-for-10 could be combined into one share of common stock; and (b) authorize our Board to file only one such amendment, as determined by the Board at its sole option, and to abandon each amendment not selected by the Board. Our Board may also elect not to undertake a Reverse Stock Split and therefore abandon all amendments.

The text of the proposed form of Certificate of Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, which we refer to as the Certificate of Amendment, is attached hereto as APPENDIX A.

We are proposing that our Board have the discretion to select the Reverse Stock Split ratio from within a range between and including 1-for-5 to 1-for-10, rather than proposing that stockholders approve a specific ratio at this time, in order to give our Board the flexibility to implement a Reverse Stock Split at a ratio that reflects the Board’s then-current assessment of the factors described below under “—Criteria to be Used for Determining Whether to Implement a Reverse Stock Split.” If the Board decides to implement a Reverse Stock Split, we will file the Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effecting the Board’s chosen Reverse Stock Split at the close of business on the business day following its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, or such later time as is chosen by the Board and set forth in the Certificate of Amendment. Except for adjustments that may result from the treatment of fractional shares as described below, each of our stockholders will hold the same percentage of our outstanding common stock immediately following a Reverse Stock Split as such stockholder holds immediately prior to such Reverse Stock Split.

Reasons for a Reverse Stock Split

Potential improvement in the marketability and liquidity of our common stock. Our Board believes that the higher market price of our common stock expected as a result of implementing a Reverse Stock Split could improve the marketability and liquidity of our common stock and encourage interest and trading in our common stock, including by long-term investors who may not find our shares attractive at their current prices.

•

Stock Price Requirements: We understand that many brokerage houses, institutional investors and funds have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers or by

restricting or limiting the ability to purchase such stocks on margin. Additionally, a Reverse Stock Split could help increase analyst and broker interest in our common stock as their internal policies might discourage them from following or recommending companies with low stock prices.

•

Stock Price Volatility: Because of the trading volatility often associated with low-priced stocks, many brokerage houses and institutional investors have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers. Some of those policies and practices may make the processing of trades in low-priced stocks economically unattractive to brokers.

•	Transaction Costs: Investors may be dissuaded from purchasing stocks below certain prices because brokers’ commissions, as a percentage of the total transaction value, can be higher for low-priced stocks.

Compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, which has as one of its continued listing requirements a minimum bid price of at least $1.00 per share (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”). As of the Record Date, the closing price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market was $0.78. If we were to fall out of compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement and fail to regain compliance, our common stock could be subject to delisting from The Nasdaq Capital Market, which may cause a number of potential harms to us and our stockholders, including an adverse affect on the liquidity of our common stock, increased volatility in our common stock, the loss of current or future coverage by certain sell-side analysts and/or a diminution of institutional investor interest. Delisting could also cause a loss of confidence of our collaborators, vendors and employees, which could harm our business and future prospects. If our common stock was delisted by Nasdaq, our common stock could be eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, OTC-QB or another over-the-counter market. Any such alternative would likely result in it being more difficult for us to raise additional capital through the public or private sale of equity securities and for investors to dispose of or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock. Moreover, if our common stock is delisted, it may come within the definition of “penny stock” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. These requirements may reduce trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock and may impact the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell our securities which could limit the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the public market and limit our ability to attract and retain qualified employees or raise additional capital in the future.

A Reverse Stock Split would decrease the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding and should, absent other factors, proportionately increase the market price of our common stock above $1.00 per share. Therefore, the Board believes that a Reverse Stock Split is a potentially effective means for us to maintain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement and avoid, or at least mitigate, the likely adverse consequences of our common stock being delisted.

Increase in the number of authorized and available shares of common stock. An additional purpose of a Reverse Stock Split is to effectively increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock because only the outstanding shares of common stock would be reduced by the Reverse Stock Split. We have a limited number of authorized and unreserved shares that are available for future issuance, and implementing a Reverse Stock Split would provide the flexibility to use our common stock for business and/or financial purposes.

In addition to the 306,790,213 shares of common stock outstanding on March 31, 2023, we have also reserved 4,355,892 shares for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, 32,012,571 shares for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, 2,456,978 shares for issuance of outstanding RSU awards, 290,000 shares for issuance of outstanding PSU awards, and 15,380,522 shares for issuance pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plan, employee stock purchase plan and inducement plan, meaning that, as of March 31, 2023, we had 38,713,824 authorized shares available for issuance (in each case these amounts are before any adjustment for any Reverse Stock Split), which the Board believes is insufficient to meet our needs in connection with our future capital requirements and properly incentivizing our key personnel, among other things.

The Board believes that the effective increase in our authorized but unissued shares of common stock that would result from a Reverse Stock Split is necessary in order to provide us with the flexibility to issue additional

shares in the future on a timely basis in connection with potential financings, strategic relationships, business combinations and strategic transactions (including to expand our business or product lines through the acquisition of other businesses or products), among other purposes, without the potential delay and expense associated with convening a special meeting of the stockholders. We have funded our operations to date primarily from the issuance and sale of our securities, and we currently have a limited number of authorized and unreserved shares that are available for future issuance.

In particular, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm that accompanies our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 contained an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As discussed in our Annual Report, we disclosed that (i) we anticipate our available cash balance will not be sufficient for the next twelve months from the issuance of our Annual Report and (ii) we plan to raise additional capital to fulfill our operating and capital requirements through public or private equity or debt financings. Our estimate as to how long we expect our existing cash and cash equivalents to be available to fund our operations is based on assumptions that may prove inaccurate, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. In addition, changing circumstances may cause us to increase our spending significantly faster than we currently anticipate, and we may need to spend more money than currently expected because of circumstances beyond our control. If we are unable to raise additional capital, when and as needed, our current cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash would be insufficient to sustain our operations and, among other things, stockholder value would be harmed. Accordingly, if our stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will be limited in our ability to raise additional capital, which would materially and adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to continue as a going concern may be materially and adversely affected. Even if this proposal is approved by our stockholders, there is no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional financing.

Our success also depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified directors, management and key personnel. If this Proposal 4 is not approved by our stockholders, the lack of unissued and unreserved authorized shares of common stock to provide future equity incentive opportunities could adversely impact our ability to achieve these goals. In short, if our stockholders do not approve this Proposal 4, we may not be able to access the capital markets, complete corporate collaborations or partnerships, attract, retain and motivate directors and employees, and pursue other business opportunities integral to our growth and success.

The effective increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock upon approval and implementation of a Reverse Stock Split will not, by itself, have an immediate dilutive effect on our current stockholders. However, if this Proposal 4 is approved, unless otherwise required by applicable law or stock exchange rules, the Board will be able to issue additional shares of common stock from time to time in its discretion without further action or authorization by the stockholders. The newly available authorized shares of common stock would be issuable for any proper corporate purpose, including capital raising transactions of equity or convertible debt securities, the establishment of collaborations or other strategic agreements, stock splits, stock dividends, issuance under current or future equity incentive plans, future acquisitions, investment opportunities, or for other corporate purposes. The future issuance of additional shares of common stock or securities convertible into our common stock may occur at times or under circumstances that could result in a dilutive effect on the earnings per share, book value per share, voting power and percentage interest of the present holders of our common stock, some of whom have preemptive rights to subscribe for additional shares that we may issue.

Other than future issuances under our equity compensation plans, possible issuances (subject to the future discretion of the appointed pricing committee of the Board) under our “at-the-market” sales agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC, and the possible issuance of securities exercisable for our common stock to banks, equipment lessors or other financial institutions, the Board currently has no specific plans, arrangements or understandings to issue the additional authorized shares of common stock that will effectively result from approval and implementation of a Reverse Stock Split. As of the date of this proxy statement, we have a sufficient number of authorized shares of common stock under our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, as presently in effect to issue shares of common stock upon the exercise of all outstanding convertible securities and any other outstanding equity-linked obligations as they come due.

Criteria to be Used for Determining Whether to Implement Reverse Stock Split

In determining whether to implement a Reverse Stock Split and which Reverse Stock Split ratio to implement, if any, following receipt of stockholder approval of this Proposal 4, our Board may consider, among other things, various factors, such as:

•	the historical trading price and trading volume of our common stock;

•	the then-prevailing trading price and trading volume of our common stock and the expected impact of a Reverse Stock Split on the trading market for our common stock in the short- and long-term;

•	the continued listing requirements for our common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market;

•	which Reverse Stock Split ratio would result in the least administrative cost to us;

•	prevailing general market and economic conditions; and

•	whether and when our Board desires to have the additional authorized but unissued shares of common stock that will effectively result from the implementation of a Reverse Stock Split when available to provide the flexibility to use our common stock for business and/or financial purposes.

Certain Risks and Potential Disadvantages Associated with a Reverse Stock Split

We cannot assure you that any proposed Reverse Stock Split will increase our stock price and have the desired effect of maintaining compliance with Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. We expect that a Reverse Stock Split will increase the market price of our common stock so that we may be able to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq $1.00 minimum bid price requirement. However, the effect of a Reverse Stock Split on the market price of our common stock cannot be predicted with any certainty, and the history of similar reverse stock splits for companies in like circumstances is varied, particularly since some investors may view a reverse stock split negatively. It is possible that the per share price of our common stock after a Reverse Stock Split will not rise in proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding resulting from a Reverse Stock Split, the market price per post-Reverse Stock Split share may not remain in excess of the $1.00 minimum bid price for a sustained period of time, and a Reverse Stock Split may not result in a per share price that would attract brokers and investors who do not trade in lower priced stocks. In addition, although we believe that a Reverse Stock Split may enhance the desirability of our common stock to certain potential investors, we cannot assure you that, if implemented, our common stock will be more attractive to institutional and other long-term investors. Even if we implement a Reverse Stock Split, the market price of our common stock may decrease due to factors unrelated to such Reverse Stock Split. In any case, the market price of our common stock may also be based on other factors which may be unrelated to the number of shares outstanding, including our future performance. If a Reverse Stock Split is consummated and the trading price of the common stock declines, the percentage decline as an absolute number and as a percentage of our overall market capitalization may be greater than would occur in the absence of a Reverse Stock Split.

Any proposed Reverse Stock Split may decrease the liquidity of our common stock and result in higher transaction costs. The liquidity of our common stock may be negatively impacted by a Reverse Stock Split, given the reduced number of shares that would be outstanding after a Reverse Stock Split, particularly if the stock price does not increase as a result of a Reverse Stock Split. In addition, if a Reverse Stock Split is implemented, it will increase the number of our stockholders who own “odd lots” of fewer than 100 shares of common stock. Brokerage commission and other costs of transactions in odd lots are generally higher than the costs of transactions of more than 100 shares of common stock. Accordingly, a Reverse Stock Split may not achieve the desired results of increasing marketability and liquidity of our common stock described above.

The effective increase in the authorized number of shares of our common stock as a result of a Reverse Stock Split could have anti-takeover implications. The implementation of a Reverse Stock Split will result in an effective increase in the authorized number of shares of our common stock, which could, under certain circumstances, have anti-takeover implications. The additional shares of common stock that would become available for issuance if this Proposal 4 is approved and a Reverse Stock Split is implemented could be used by us to oppose a hostile takeover attempt or to delay or prevent changes in control or our management. For example, without further stockholder approval, the Board could adopt a “poison pill” which would, under certain circumstances related to an acquisition of our securities that is not approved by the Board, give certain holders the right to acquire additional shares of our common stock at a low price. The Board also could strategically sell

shares of common stock in a private transaction to purchasers who would oppose a takeover or favor the current Board. Although this Proposal 4 has been prompted by business and financial considerations and not by the threat of any hostile takeover attempt (nor is the Board currently aware of any such attempts directed at us), stockholders should be aware that approval of this Proposal 4 could facilitate future efforts by us to deter or prevent changes in control, including transactions in which the stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices.

Principal Effects of a Reverse Stock Split

After the effective date of any Reverse Stock Split that our Board elects to implement, each stockholder will own a reduced number of shares of common stock. However, any Reverse Stock Split will affect all of our stockholders uniformly and will not affect any of our stockholder’s percentage ownership interests, except to the extent that a Reverse Stock Split results in any of our stockholders owning a fractional share as described below. Voting rights and other rights and preferences of the holders of our common stock will not be affected by a Reverse Stock Split (other than as a result of the payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares). For example, a holder of 2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock immediately prior to a Reverse Stock Split would continue to hold 2% (assuming there is no impact as a result of the payment of cash in lieu of issuing fractional shares) of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock immediately after such Reverse Stock Split. The number of stockholders of record will not be affected by a Reverse Stock Split (except to the extent that any stockholder holds only a fractional share interest and receives cash for such interest after such Reverse Stock Split).

The principal effects of a Reverse Stock Split will be that:

•	each 5 to 10 shares of our common stock owned by a stockholder (depending on the Reverse Stock Split ratio selected by the Board), will be combined into one new share of our common stock without increasing or decreasing the par value thereof;

•

no fractional shares of common stock will be issued in connection with any Reverse Stock Split; instead, holders of common stock who would otherwise receive a fractional share of common stock pursuant to a Reverse Stock Split will receive cash in lieu of the fractional share as explained more fully below;

•

based upon the Reverse Stock Split ratio selected by the Board, proportionate adjustments will be made to the per share exercise price and/or the number of shares issuable upon the exercise or vesting of all then outstanding stock options, restricted stock units and warrants, which will result in a proportional decrease in the number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise or vesting of such stock options, restricted stock units and warrants, and, in the case of stock options and warrants, a proportional increase in the exercise price of all such stock options and warrants; and

•	the number of shares then reserved for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be reduced proportionately based upon the Reverse Stock Split ratio selected by the Board.

The following table contains approximate information, based on share information as of March 31, 2023, relating to our outstanding common stock based on the proposed Reverse Stock Split ratios (without giving effect to the treatment of fractional shares), and information regarding our authorized and available shares:

Status	Number of Shares of Common Stock Authorized	Number of Shares of Common Stock Issued and Outstanding	Number of Shares of Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance	Number of Shares of Common Stock Authorized but Unissued and Unreserved
Pre-Reverse Stock Split	400,000,000	306,790,213	54,495,963	38,713,824
Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:5	400,000,000	61,358,042	10,899,192	327,742,766
Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:6	400,000,000	51,131,702	9,082,660	339,785,638
Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:7	400,000,000	43,827,173	7,785,137	348,387,690
Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:8	400,000,000	38,348,776	6,811,995	354,839,229
Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:9	400,000,000	34,087,801	6,055,107	359,857,092
Post-Reverse Stock Split 1:10	400,000,000	30,679,021	5,449,596	363,871,383

After the effective date of any Reverse Stock Split that our Board elects to implement, our common stock would have a new committee on uniform securities identification procedures (“CUSIP number”), a number used to identify our common stock.

Our common stock is currently registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, and we are subject to the periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act. The implementation of any proposed Reverse Stock Split will not affect the registration of our common stock under the Exchange Act. Our common stock would continue to be listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “BNGO” immediately following a Reverse Stock Split, although it is likely that Nasdaq would add the letter “D” to the end of the trading symbol for a period of twenty trading days after the effective date of a Reverse Stock Split to indicate that a Reverse Stock Split had occurred.

Effective Date

The proposed Reverse Stock Split would become effective at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the business day following the filing of a Certificate of Amendment with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, or such later date as is chosen by the Board and set forth in the Certificate of Amendment, which date we refer to in this Proposal 4 as the “Effective Date.” Except as explained below with respect to fractional shares, effective as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the Effective Date, shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior thereto will be combined, automatically and without any action on the part of us or our stockholders, into a lesser number of new shares of our common stock in accordance with the Reverse Stock Split ratio determined by our Board within the limits set forth in this Proposal 4.

Cash Payment In Lieu of Fractional Shares

No fractional shares of common stock will be issued as a result of any Reverse Stock Split. Instead, in lieu of any fractional shares to which a stockholder of record would otherwise be entitled as a result of a Reverse Stock Split, we will pay cash (without interest) equal to such fraction multiplied by the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market during regular trading hours for the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding the Effective Date (with such average closing sales prices being adjusted to give effect to a Reverse Stock Split). After such Reverse Stock Split, a stockholder otherwise entitled to a fractional interest will not have any voting, dividend or other rights with respect to such fractional interest except to receive payment as described above.

As of the Record Date, there were 93 stockholders of record of our common stock. Upon stockholder approval of this Proposal 4, if our Board elects to implement a Reverse Stock Split, stockholders owning, prior to such Reverse Stock Split, less than the number of whole shares of common stock that will be combined into one share of common stock in such Reverse Stock Split would no longer be stockholders. For example, if a stockholder held five shares of common stock immediately prior to a Reverse Stock Split and the Reverse Stock Split ratio selected by the Board was 1:10, then such stockholder would cease to be a stockholder of Bionano following such Reverse Stock Split and would not have any voting, dividend or other rights except to receive payment for the fractional share as described above. Based on our stockholders of record as of the Record Date, and assuming a Reverse Stock Split ratio of 1-for-10, we expect that cashing out fractional stockholders would reduce the number of stockholders of record by 31 holders to 62 holders. In addition, we do not intend for this transaction to be the first step in a series of plans or proposals of a “going private transaction” within the meaning of Rule 13e-3 of the Exchange Act.

Record and Beneficial Stockholders

If this Proposal 4 is approved by our stockholders and our Board elects to implement a Reverse Stock Split, stockholders of record holding all of their shares of our common stock electronically in book-entry form under the direct registration system for securities will be automatically exchanged by the exchange agent and will receive a transaction statement at their address of record indicating the number of new post-split shares of our common stock they hold after a Reverse Stock Split along with payment in lieu of any fractional shares. Non-registered stockholders holding common stock through a broker should note that such brokers, banks, dealers or other agents may have different procedures for processing a Reverse Stock Split and making payment for fractional shares than those that would be put in place by us for registered stockholders. If you hold your shares with such a broker, bank, dealer or other agent and if you have questions in this regard, you are encouraged to contact your agent.

If this Proposal 4 is approved by our stockholders and our Board elects to implement a Reverse Stock Split, stockholders of record holding some or all of their shares in certificate form will receive a letter of transmittal from Bionano or its exchange agent, as soon as practicable after the effective date of such Reverse Stock Split. Our transfer agent is expected to act as “exchange agent” for the purpose of implementing the exchange of stock certificates. Holders of pre-Reverse Stock Split shares will be asked to surrender to the exchange agent certificates representing pre-Reverse Stock Split shares in exchange for post-Reverse Stock Split shares and payment in lieu of fractional shares (if any) in accordance with the procedures to be set forth in the letter of transmittal. No new post-Reverse Stock Split share certificates will be issued to a stockholder until such stockholder has surrendered such stockholder’s outstanding certificate(s) together with the properly completed and executed letter of transmittal to the exchange agent.

STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD NOT DESTROY ANY PRE-SPLIT STOCK CERTIFICATE AND SHOULD NOT SUBMIT ANY CERTIFICATES UNTIL THEY ARE REQUESTED TO DO SO.

Accounting Consequences

The par value per share of our common stock would remain unchanged at $0.0001 per share after any Reverse Stock Split. As a result, on the Effective Date, the stated capital on our balance sheet attributable to the common stock would be reduced proportionally, based on the actual Reverse Stock Split ratio, from its present amount, and the additional paid-in capital account would be credited with the amount by which the stated capital would be reduced. The net income or loss per share of common stock would be increased because there would be fewer shares of common stock outstanding. A Reverse Stock Split would be reflected retroactively in our consolidated financial statements. We do not anticipate that any other accounting consequences would arise as a result of any Reverse Stock Split.

No Dissenters’ or Appraisal Rights

Our stockholders are not entitled to dissenters’ or appraisal rights under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware with respect to the proposed alternate amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to allow for a Reverse Stock Split and we will not independently provide the stockholders with any such right if any Reverse Stock Split is implemented.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of a Reverse Stock Split that are generally expected to be applicable to U.S. Holders (as defined below) who hold their common stock as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) (generally property held for investment). This summary is based on provisions of the Code, applicable Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial authority and current administrative rulings and practices as in effect on the date of this proxy statement. Changes to these laws could alter the tax consequences described below, possibly with retroactive effect, which may result in the U.S. federal income tax consequences of a Reverse Stock Split differing substantially from the consequences summarized below. We have not sought and will not seek an opinion of counsel or a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service regarding the federal income tax consequences of a Reverse Stock Split.

This discussion is for general information only and does not purport to consider all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that might be relevant to a U.S. Holder. This discussion does not address the tax consequences which may apply to stockholders subject to special rules, such as financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, stockholders who hold their pre-Reverse Stock Split shares through individual retirement or other tax-deferred accounts, stockholders who are not U.S. Holders, stockholders who have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships or disregarded entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes (or persons holding our common stock through such entities), stockholders who hold the pre-Reverse Stock Split shares as part of a straddle, hedge, or conversion transaction, stockholders who hold the pre-Reverse Stock Split shares as qualified small business stock within the meaning of Section 1202 of the Code or Section 1244 stock for purposes of Section 1244 of the Code, stockholders who acquired their stock in a transaction subject to the gain rollover provisions of Section 1045 of the Code, or stockholders who acquired their pre-Reverse Stock Split shares pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation.

In addition, this summary does not address: (a) the tax consequences of transactions effectuated before, after or at the same time as a Reverse Stock Split, whether or not they are in connection with a Reverse Stock Split; (b) any U.S. federal non-income tax consequences of a Reverse Stock Split, including estate, gift or other tax consequences; (c) any state, local or non-U.S. tax consequences of a Reverse Stock Split; (d) the alternative minimum tax, the Medicare contribution tax on net investment income, or special tax accounting rules under Section 451(b) of the Code, or (e) tax consequences to holders of options, warrants or similar rights to acquire our common stock. Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors to determine the particular consequences to them.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is any of the following:

•	an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States or treated as a U.S. citizen or resident for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

•	a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia;

•	an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

•

a trust if (i) a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more “United States persons” (within the meaning of Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code) are authorized or have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) it has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

A Reverse Stock Split should constitute a “recapitalization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, the federal income tax consequences of a Reverse Stock Split will vary depending upon whether a U.S. Holder receives cash for fractional shares or solely a reduced number of shares of common stock in exchange for their old shares of common stock. A U.S. Holder who receives solely a reduced number of shares of common stock should generally not recognize gain or loss in a Reverse Stock Split. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in the reduced number of shares of common stock should equal the U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in its old shares of common stock and such U.S. Holder’s holding period in the reduced number of shares of common stock will include the holding period in its old shares of common stock exchanged. Treasury Regulations provide detailed rules for allocating the tax basis and holding period of the shares of common stock surrendered to the shares of common stock received in a recapitalization pursuant to a Reverse Stock Split. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors as to application of the foregoing rules where shares of common stock were acquired at different times or at different prices.

A U.S. Holder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share as a result of a Reverse Stock Split should generally recognize gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of cash received and the portion of the U.S. Holder’s basis in the common stock surrendered that is allocated to the fractional share. Such gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for such shares was more than one year at the time of a Reverse Stock Split. Long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders are generally subject to preferential tax rates. There are limitations on the deductibility of capital losses under the Code. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in the reduced number of shares of common stock should equal the U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in its old shares of common stock decreased by the basis allocated to the fractional share for which such U.S. Holder is entitled to receive cash, and the holding period of the reduced number of shares received will include the holding period of the old shares exchanged.

Stockholders may be subject to information reporting with respect to any cash received in exchange for a fractional share interest in a new share in a Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who are subject to information reporting and who do not provide a correct taxpayer identification number and other required information (such as by submitting a properly completed IRS Form W-9) may also be subject to backup withholding at the applicable rate. Any amount withheld under such rules is not an additional tax and may be refunded or credited against the stockholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is properly furnished in a timely manner to the IRS.

The preceding discussion is intended only as a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of a Reverse Stock Split. It is not a complete analysis or discussion of all potential tax effects that may be important to a particular holder. All holders of our common stock should consult their own tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences of a Reverse Stock Split to them, including record retention and tax-reporting requirements, and the applicability and effect of any federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax laws.

Vote Required

Approval of the Reverse Stock Split Proposal requires “For” votes from the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock and the one share of Series A Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class. Each share of common stock has one vote. The share of Series A Preferred Stock has 3,000,000,000 votes, but those votes must be voted in the same proportion as the votes cast by shares of common stock on this proposal. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total and will have the same effect as “Against” votes for this proposal. We do not anticipate broker non-votes for this proposal because we have been advised by NYSE that this proposal should be considered “routine” under NYSE rules, and accordingly, we believe that your broker may vote your shares on this proposal without instructions from you; however, to the extent there are broker non-votes for this proposal, we believe such broker non-votes will be counted as votes “Against” such proposal. Nevertheless, whether a proposal is “routine” or “non-routine” remains subject to the final determination of NYSE. If your shares are held by a bank, we believe your shares cannot be voted without your specific instructions. Further, because the share of Series A Preferred Stock has 3,000,000,000 votes and will vote in a manner that mirrors votes actually cast (which does not include abstentions or broker non-votes), abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the manner in which the Series A Preferred Stock votes are cast. Therefore, if you do not wish for this proposal to pass, you should vote “Against” this proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 4.

PROPOSAL 5

APPROVAL OF AN ADJOURNMENT OF THE ANNUAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY,

TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES

General

If the Annual Meeting is convened and a quorum is present, but there are not sufficient votes to approve Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal) or if there are insufficient votes to constitute a quorum, our proxy holders may move to adjourn the Annual Meeting at that time in order to enable the Board to solicit additional proxies.

In this proposal, we are asking our stockholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the Board to vote in favor of granting discretionary authority to the proxy holders, and each of them individually, to adjourn the Annual Meeting to another time and place, if necessary or appropriate (as determined in good faith by the Board), to solicit additional proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes to approve Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal). If our stockholders approve this proposal, we could adjourn the Annual Meeting and any adjourned or postponed session of the Annual Meeting and use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from our stockholders that have previously voted. Among other things, approval of this proposal could mean that, even if we had received proxies representing a sufficient number of votes to defeat Proposal 4 (the Reverse Stock Split Proposal), we could adjourn the Annual Meeting without a vote on such proposal and seek to convince our stockholders to change their votes in favor of such proposal.

If it is necessary or appropriate (as determined in good faith by the Board) to adjourn the Annual Meeting, no notice of the adjourned meeting is required to be given to our stockholders, other than an announcement at the Annual Meeting of the time and place to which the Annual Meeting is adjourned, so long as the meeting is adjourned for 30 days or less and no new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting. At the adjourned meeting, we may transact any business which might have been transacted at the original meeting.

Vote Required

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS

A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 5.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers as of the date of this proxy statement:

Name	Age	Position
R. Erik Holmlin, Ph.D.	55	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Christopher Stewart	54	Chief Financial Officer
Mark Oldakowski	49	Chief Operating Officer
Alka Chaubey, Ph.D., FACMG	50	Chief Medical Officer
Jonathan Dixon, J.D.	48	General Counsel

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT DIRECTORS

The following sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers who are not directors:

Christopher Stewart. Mr. Stewart has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2020. Mr. Stewart served as the Head of Maxwell Ultracapacitors at Tesla, Inc., a public electric vehicle and clean energy company, from May 2019 to July 2020, and as Vice President, Finance and Information Technology at Maxwell Technologies Inc., a public energy storage company, from July 2015 to May 2019 (at which point the company was acquired by Tesla, Inc.). In addition, Mr. Stewart held multiple leadership roles, including as Vice President, Finance at Entropic Communications and as Chief Financial Officer of V-ENABLE Inc. (currently GroundTruth), a leader in targeted mobile advertising. Mr. Stewart received his B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Southern California and his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.

Mark Oldakowski. Mr. Oldakowski has served as our Chief Operating Officer since November 2017 and previously served as our Vice President, Product Development and Operations since October 2014. Mr. Oldakowski previously served as the Senior Director of Engineering and Chief Product Officer at Brooks Life Science Systems (currently Azenta Life Sciences), a private automation and cryogenic solutions company, from December 2011 to August 2014, and as a Director of Engineering at Affymetrix, Inc. (now Applied Biosystems), a private life science systems company, from April 2009 to October 2011. From December 2007 to April 2009, Mr. Oldakowski served as a Senior Manager and Core Team Leader of R&D for Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, and for the prior 13 years, he developed sequencing and real-time PCR systems at Applied Biosystems, now a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific. Mr. Oldakowski received both his B.S. in Electrical Engineering and his M.S. in Computer and Systems Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Alka Chaubey, Ph.D., FACMG. Dr. Chaubey has served as our Chief Medical Officer since August 2020. Dr. Chaubey has also served on the board of directors of the Cancer Genomics Consortium, a nonprofit organization focusing on clinical cancer genomics, since August 2016, as a member of the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee of the American Board of Medical Genetics and Genomics, since March 2021, and as the Genetics Subdivision Nominating Committee representative of the Association for Molecular Pathology, a nonprofit organization focusing on molecular diagnostics, until July 2021. Dr. Chaubey served as the Head of Cytogenomics at PerkinElmer Genomics, a subsidiary of the public company PerkinElmer, Inc. focused on genetic and genomic testing, from May 2018 to August 2020, where she led the successful development and launch of several innovative products including the CNGnome test (low-pass whole genome sequencing), and a new FSHD assay utilizing Saphyr. She has also played an integral role on Vanadis team at PerkinElmer in their efforts to bring a new PCR-free NIPT technology to the market. Prior to PerkinElmer Genomics, Dr. Chaubey was the Director of the Cytogenomics Laboratory at the Greenwood Genetic Center, a nonprofit genetic diagnostic institute, from August 2013 to August 2020, where she also served as an Assistant Director from August 2010 to August 2013. Dr. Chaubey also holds an academic appointment as the Scientific Director of the Georgia Esoteric and Molecular Laboratory, Scientific Director of the Cytogenetics Laboratory of the Augusta University Medical Center and Adjunct Assistant professor of Pathology of the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University. Dr. Chaubey received her Ph.D. from Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India and completed her post-doctoral studies at Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India, and University of Illinois at Chicago.

Jonathan Dixon, J.D. Mr. Dixon has served as our General Counsel since March 2023, and as our Global Head of Legal since March 2022. From March 2015 to March 2022 Mr. Dixon served as Associate General Counsel, IP, at Becton, Dickinson and Company. Prior to this, Mr. Dixon served as Assistant General Counsel at CareFusion from June 2013 to March 2015. From March 2006 to June 2013, he served as Senior Intellectual Property Counsel at Becton, Dickinson and Company. From June 2003 to March 2006, Mr. Dixon served as Director, Legal Affairs at GeneOhm Sciences, Inc. Prior to this he served at the National Institutes of Health as Technology Transfer Officer from June 2001 to June 2003. Mr. Dixon received his B.S. in both Microbiology and Economics from Brigham Young University and received his J.D. from Lewis and Clark College.

SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Bionano Genomics Inc.