DEF 14A 1 ny20003476x1_def14a.htm DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒	Definitive Proxy Statement

☐	Definitive Additional Materials

☐	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

AbCellera Biologics Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABCELLERA BIOLOGICS INC.

2215 Yukon Street

Vancouver, BC V5Y 0A1

NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To be held June 15, 2022

Notice is hereby given that the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or Annual Meeting, of AbCellera Biologics Inc. will be held on Tuesday, June 15, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. To protect the health and safety of our shareholders, employees, directors and community in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting. Shareholders may attend the virtual Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ABCL2022. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 16-digit control number, which is included on your notice and your proxy card. The purpose of the Annual Meeting is the following:

1.	To elect two class II directors to our Board of Directors, to serve until the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal;

2.	To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022;

3.	To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, or Say-on-Pay;

4.	To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes; and

5.	To transact any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

The proposal for the election of directors relates solely to the election of class II directors nominated by the Board of Directors.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 18, 2022, will be entitled to vote during the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 16-digit control number, which is included on your notice and your proxy card. You will not be able to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting in person.

We are pleased to take advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. We are mailing to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or Notice, instead of a paper copy of our proxy materials and our 2021 Annual Report to Shareholders, or 2021 Annual Report. The Notice contains instructions on how to access those documents and to cast your vote via the Internet. The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials and our 2021 Annual Report. This process allows us to provide our shareholders with necessary information on a more timely basis, while reducing the environmental impact and lowering the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you are able to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented. To ensure that your vote is recorded promptly, please vote as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. You may vote by submitting your proxy via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail (if you received paper copies of the proxy materials) by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card. Voting over the Internet or by telephone, written proxy or voting instruction card will ensure your representation at the virtual Annual Meeting regardless of whether you attend.

			By order of the Board of Directors,

			/s/Tryn T. Stimart
			Tryn T. Stimart Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Secretary
Vancouver, BC
April 28, 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABCELLERA BIOLOGICS INC.

2215 Yukon Street

Vancouver, BC V5Y 0A1

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD JUNE 15, 2022

This proxy statement contains information about the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or the Annual Meeting, of AbCellera Biologics Inc., which will be held on Tuesday, June 15, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. To protect the health and safety of our shareholders, employees, directors and community in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the 2022 Annual Meeting will be a virtual shareholders meeting held at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ABCL2022. Our Board of Directors is using this proxy statement to solicit proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. In this proxy statement, the terms “AbCellera,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to AbCellera Biologics Inc. The mailing address of our principal executive offices is 2215 Yukon Street Vancouver, BC V5Y 0A1.

All properly submitted proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained in those proxies. If no instructions are specified, the proxies will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of our Board of Directors with respect to each of the matters set forth in the accompanying Notice of Meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the meeting by giving our proxy tabulator written notice to that effect. Such written notice should be delivered by mail to Proxy Tabulator for AbCellera Biologics Inc., c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, Vote Processing Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood NY, 11717.

We made this proxy statement and our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, available to shareholders on or about April 28, 2022.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for

the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on June 15, 2022:

This proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report to Shareholders are

available for viewing, printing and downloading at http://materials.proxyvote.com/00288U.

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the SEC, except for exhibits, will be furnished without charge to any shareholder upon written request to AbCellera Biologics Inc., 2215 Yukon Street Vancouver, BC V5Y 0A1, Attention: Corporate Secretary. This proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, or on our website at www.abcellera.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABCELLERA BIOLOGICS INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

GENERAL INFORMATION

When are this proxy statement and the accompanying materials scheduled to be sent to shareholders?

We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials to our shareholders via the Internet. Accordingly, on or about April 28, 2022, we will begin mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or Notice. Our proxy materials, including the Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card or, for shares held in street name (i.e., held for your account by a broker or other nominee), a voting instruction form, and the 2021 Annual Report to Shareholders, or 2021 Annual Report, will be mailed or made available to shareholders on the Internet on or about the same date.

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, for most shareholders, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet rather than printing and mailing our proxy materials. We believe following this process will expedite the receipt of such materials and will help lower our costs and reduce the environmental impact of our annual meeting materials. Therefore, the Notice was mailed to holders of record and beneficial owners of our common shares starting on or about April 28, 2022. The Notice provides instructions as to how shareholders may access and review our proxy materials, including the Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, this proxy statement, the proxy card and our 2021 Annual Report, on the website referred to in the Notice or, alternatively, how to request that a copy of the proxy materials, including a proxy card, be sent to them by mail. The Notice also provides voting instructions. In addition, shareholders of record may request to receive the proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis for future shareholders meetings. Please note that, while our proxy materials are available at the website referenced in the Notice, and our Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, this proxy statement and our 2021 Annual Report are available on our website, no other information contained on either website is incorporated by reference in or considered to be a part of this proxy statement.

Who is soliciting my vote?

Our Board of Directors is soliciting your vote for the Annual Meeting.

When is the record date for the Annual Meeting?

The record date for determination of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is the close of business on April 18, 2022.

How many votes can be cast by all shareholders?

There were 284,525,930 common shares, no par value per share, outstanding on April 18, 2022, all of which are entitled to vote with respect to all matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. Each shareholder of record is entitled to one (1) vote for each share of our common shares held by such shareholder. We had no undesignated preferred shares outstanding as of April 18, 2022.

Where will the Annual Meeting be held this year?

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and after careful consideration, the Board of Directors determined to hold a virtual annual meeting this year in order to protect the health and safety of our shareholders, employees, directors and community. There will not be a physical meeting.

We are committed to ensuring that shareholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. In order to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and vote your shares, shareholders of record as of April 18, 2022, can access www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ABCL2022. To join

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the annual meeting, you will need to have your 16-digit control number, which is included on your notice and your proxy card. If you do not have a control number, please contact your broker, bank, or other nominee as soon as possible, so that you can be provided with a control number and gain access to the meeting.

We will not charge you for access to the virtual annual meeting, though your internet service provider may charge a fee for network access. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting virtually, we recommend that you also vote by proxy as described herein so that your vote will be counted if you decide not to attend the annual meeting.

How do I vote?

If you are a shareholder of record, there are several ways for you to vote your shares.

•

Online during the Annual Meeting. You may vote during the virtual Annual Meeting by following the instructions available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ABCL2022. If you hold your shares through a bank or broker and wish to vote at the virtual Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from the firm that holds your shares. To join the annual meeting, you will need to have your 16-digit control number, which is included on your notice and your proxy card. If you do not have a control number, please contact your broker, bank, or other nominee as soon as possible, so that you can be provided with a control number and gain access to the meeting.

•

By Internet or Telephone prior to the Annual Meeting. You can vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice. In order to be counted, proxies submitted by Internet or by telephone must be received by the cutoff time of 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 14, 2022.

•	By Mail prior to the Annual Meeting. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you can vote by mailing your proxy as described in the proxy materials. Proxies submitted by mail must be received before the start of the Annual Meeting.

If you complete and submit your proxy before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your proxy in accordance with your instructions. If you submit a proxy without giving voting instructions, your shares will be voted in the manner recommended by the Board of Directors on all matters presented in this proxy statement, and as the persons named as proxies may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. You may also authorize another person or persons to act for you as proxy in a writing, signed by you or your authorized representative, specifying the details of those proxies’ authority. The original writing must be given to each of the named proxies, although it may be sent to them by electronic transmission if, from that transmission, it can be determined that the transmission was authorized by you.

If any other matters are properly presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the Annual Meeting to another time or place (including, without limitation, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies), the persons named in your proxy and acting thereunder will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment. We do not currently anticipate that any other matters will be raised at the Annual Meeting.

How do I revoke my proxy?

You may revoke your proxy by (1) following the instructions on the Notice and entering a new vote by mail that we receive before the start of the Annual Meeting or over the Internet by the cutoff time of 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 14, 2022, (2) attending and voting at the virtual Annual Meeting (although attendance at the virtual Annual Meeting will not in and of itself revoke a proxy), or (3) by filing an instrument in writing revoking the proxy or another duly executed proxy bearing a later date with our Corporate Secretary. Any written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy card must be received by our proxy tabulator prior to the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting. Such written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy card should be delivered by mail to Proxy Tabulator for AbCellera Biologics Inc., c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, Vote Processing Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood NY, 11717.

If a broker, bank, or other nominee holds your shares, you must contact such broker, bank, or nominee in order to find out how to change your vote.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

How is a quorum reached?

Our articles provide that two (2) persons who are, or who represent by proxy, shareholders who, in the aggregate, hold at least a majority of the issued shares entitled to be voted at the meeting, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.

Shares that are voted “abstain” or “withheld” and broker “non-votes” are counted as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present, the meeting may be adjourned until a quorum is obtained.

How is the vote counted?

Under our articles and the British Columbia Business Corporations Act, or BCBCA, proposals are generally decided by a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders who voted in respect of that resolution, except where a larger or different vote is required by law or by our articles. Abstentions are votes cast by shareholders but are not counted as votes in favor of a proposal and, therefore, have the effect of votes against the proposal.

A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item, and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Because broker “non-votes” are not votes cast by shareholders, they are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on any such proposal and, therefore, do not have an impact on such proposals.

If your shares are held in “street name” by a brokerage firm, your brokerage firm is required to vote your shares according to your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your brokerage firm, the brokerage firm will still be able to vote your shares with respect to certain “discretionary” items, but will not be allowed to vote your shares with respect to “non-discretionary” items. Each of Proposals No. 1, 3 and 4 is a “non-discretionary” item. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to these proposals, your broker may not vote for such proposals, and those votes will be counted as broker “non-votes.” Proposal No. 2 is considered to be a discretionary item, and your brokerage firm will be able to vote on this proposal even if it does not receive instructions from you.

To be elected, each director nominated via Proposal No. 1 must receive a “for” vote from a majority of the votes cast by shareholders who voted in respect of such proposal. We have adopted a “majority voting policy” to the effect that a nominee for election as a director who does not receive a majority of “for” votes compared to the total number of votes cast with respect to the election of directors by shareholders shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors promptly following the meeting of shareholders at which the vote took place. The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider such offer and make a recommendation to our Board of Directors whether to accept such resignation. Our Board of Directors will promptly accept the resignation unless it determines, in consultation with the nominating and corporate governance committee, that there are exceptional circumstances that should delay the acceptance of the resignation or justify rejecting it. Our Board of Directors will make its decision and disclose it in a Current Report on Form 8-K within ninety (90) days following the meeting of shareholders. A director who tenders a resignation pursuant to our majority voting policy will not participate in any meeting of our Board of Directors or the nominating and corporate governance committee at which the resignation is considered. Our majority voting policy does not apply for contested meetings at which the number of directors nominated for election is greater than the number of seats available on the Board of Directors.

For Proposal No. 2 to pass, the proposal must receive a “for” vote from a majority of the votes cast by shareholders who voted in respect of such proposal.

For Proposal No. 3 to pass, the proposal must receive a “for” vote from a majority of the votes cast by shareholders who voted in respect of such proposal.

For Proposal No. 4, the frequency (whether every one year, two years or three years) receiving the highest number votes from shareholders will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by our shareholders.

Who pays the cost for soliciting proxies?

We are making this solicitation and will pay the entire cost of preparing and distributing the Notice and our proxy materials and soliciting votes. If you choose to access the proxy materials or vote over the Internet, you

TABLE OF CONTENTS

are responsible for any Internet access charges that you may incur. Our officers and employees may, without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies through further mailings, personal conversations, facsimile transmissions, e-mails, or otherwise. We have retained Broadridge Financial Solutions to assist us in the distribution of proxy materials. Proxy solicitation expenses that we will pay include those for preparation, mailing, returning, and tabulating the proxies.

How may shareholders submit matters for consideration at an annual meeting?

With respect to shareholder proposals, we are subject to the provisions of the BCBCA which sets out the requirements for a valid proposal and provides for the rights and obligations of our company and the submitter upon a valid proposal being made. Proposals submitted under the applicable provisions of the BCBCA that a shareholder intends to present at the 2022 annual meeting and wishes to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2022 annual meeting must be received at least three (3) months before the anniversary of the 2021 annual general meeting. Such proposals must also comply with all applicable provisions of the BCBCA and the regulations thereunder.

In addition, any shareholder proposal intended to be included in the proxy statement for the next annual meeting of our shareholders in 2023 must also satisfy the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and be received not later than December 29, 2022. If the date of the annual meeting is moved by more than thirty (30) days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, then notice must be received within a reasonable time before we begin to print and send proxy materials. If that happens, we will publicly announce the deadline for submitting a proposal in a press release or in a document filed with the SEC.

How can I know the voting results?

We plan to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and will publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four (4) business days following the Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF CLASS II DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors currently consists of six (6) members. In accordance with the terms of our articles, our Board of Directors is divided into three (3) classes, class I, class II and class III, with members of each class serving staggered three-year terms. The members of the classes are divided as follows:

•	the class II directors are Carl L. G. Hansen, Ph.D. and Michael Hayden, MBCHB (M.D.), Ph.D., and their terms will expire at the Annual Meeting

•	the class III directors are John S. Montalbano CFA and Peter Thiel, and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2023.

•	the class I directors are Véronique Lecault, Ph.D. and Andrew Lo, Ph.D. and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2024;

Following the initial term of office described above, directors will be elected to hold office for a three-year term expiring on our third annual general meeting following their election. At every annual general meeting and in every unanimous shareholder resolution in lieu thereof, all of the directors whose terms expire shall cease to hold office immediately before the election or appointment of directors but are eligible for re-election or re-appointment. The shareholders entitled to vote at the annual general meeting for the election of directors may elect, or in a unanimous resolution appoint, the number of directors required to fill any vacancies created, which vacancies have not already been filled as otherwise permitted in the articles. The directors will hold office for the applicable terms contemplated in the staggered board provisions. Upon resignation of a director, the remaining directors may fill the casual vacancy resulting from such resignation for the remainder of the unexpired term.

Under the BCBCA and our articles, a director may be removed with or without cause by a special resolution passed by a special majority (being two-thirds) of the votes cast by shareholders present in person or by proxy at a duly convened meeting and who are entitled to vote. To the extent directors are elected or appointed to fill casual vacancies or vacancies arising from the removal of directors, in both instances whether by shareholders or directors, the directors shall hold office until the remainder of the unexpired portion of the term of the departed director that was replaced. Any casual vacancy on occurring in the Board of Directors may be filled by the directors, subject to our articles. In addition, if our company has no directors or fewer directors in office than the number set pursuant to our articles as the quorum of directors, then the shareholders may elect or appoint directors to fill any vacancies on the Board of Directors, subject to our articles.

Our Board of Directors has nominated each of Carl L. G. Hansen, Ph.D. and Michael Hayden, MBCHB (M.D.), Ph.D., for election as the class II directors at the Annual Meeting. The nominees are presently directors and have indicated a willingness to continue to serve as directors, if elected. If the nominees become unable or unwilling to serve, however, the proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee selected by our Board of Directors.

Although we do not have a formal policy regarding the consideration of diversity in identifying director candidates, overall board diversity of industry background, race and gender is generally among the factors considered. Our priority in selection of board members is identification of members who will further the interests of our shareholders through consideration of several facts and circumstances, including among other things, the skills of the prospective director candidate, his or her depth and breadth of business experience or other background characteristics, his or her independence and the needs of the Board of Directors.

Nominees for Election as Class II Directors

The following table and narrative information identifies our nominees for class II directors, and sets forth their principal occupation and business experience during the last five years and their ages as of April 1, 2022.

Name	Positions and Offices Held	Director Since	Age
Carl L.G. Hansen, Ph.D.	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Chairman of the Board)	2012	47
Michael Hayden, MBCHB (M.D.), Ph.D.	Director	2019	70

Carl L. G. Hansen, Ph.D. Dr. Hansen is our co-founder and has served as our Chief Executive Officer, President and as the Chairman of our Board of Directors since our inception in November 2012. Dr. Hansen co-founded Precision NanoSystems Inc., a Vancouver-based private company developing next-generation delivery technology

TABLE OF CONTENTS

for genetic medicines founded in 2010, where Dr. Hansen also served as a member of the Board of Directors from January 2011 to September 2015. Until August 2019, Dr. Hansen was a professor at the University of British Columbia, where he coauthored over 65 manuscripts in the fields of microfluidics, immunology, genomics and nanotechnology. Dr. Hansen also was a co-founder and served as a member of the Board of Directors of Resolution Diagnostics, a private genomics technology company, from May 2015 to April 2016. Prior to that, he served on the science advisory board of Fluidigm Corporation, a public company providing biotechnology tools, from January 2008 to January 2012. Dr. Hansen holds a Ph.D. in Applied Physics with a focus on Biotechnology from the California Institute of Technology, and a B.A.Sc. in Engineering Physics and Honors Mathematics from the University of British Columbia. We believe Dr. Hansen is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of the perspective and experience he brings as a co-founder and our Chief Executive Officer.

Michael Hayden, MBCHB (M.D.), Ph.D. Dr. Hayden has served as a member of our Board of Directors since September 2019. Dr. Hayden is the Lead director of the Board of Directors and serves as the Chair of our Compensation Committee and is also a member of our Audit Committee. Dr. Hayden has been the Chief Executive Officer of Prilenia Therapeutics B.V., a clinical stage biotechnology company since September 2018. From September 2012 to December 2017, Dr. Hayden served as Chief Science Officer and President of Global Research and Development at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., a public pharmaceutical company. Dr. Hayden has founded a number of biotechnology companies, including Aspreva Pharmaceuticals Limited, a private pharmaceutical company; Neurovir Therapeutics, Inc., a private biopharmaceutical company; Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc., a public clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company; and 89bio, Inc., a public clinical-stage biopharma company. Dr. Hayden has served as a member of the Board of Directors for each of Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc., a public biotechnology company, since September 2018; 89bio since April 2018, and Xenon Pharmaceuticals since November 1996. From September 2018 to June 2020, Dr. Hayden also served as the executive chairman of the Board of Directors of Prilenia. Dr. Hayden is also a Killam Professor of Medical Genetics at the University of British Columbia, a Founder and Senior Scientist at the Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, and a Canada Research Chair in Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine. Dr. Hayden holds an M.B., Ch.B. (M.D.) and a Ph.D. degree in Genetics from the University of Cape Town. He is board certified by the American Societies of Internal Medicine and Medical Genetics. He is also certified by the Royal College of Physicians of Canada (Internal Medicine). We believe Dr. Hayden is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his academic background, as well as his extensive experience as a director and executive officer of both publicly and privately held biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies.

The proxies will be voted in favor of the above nominees unless a contrary specification is made in the proxy. The nominees have consented to serve as our directors if elected. However, if the nominees are unable to serve or for good cause will not serve as a director, the proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute nominee as our Board of Directors may designate.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” THE ELECTION OF MICHAEL HAYDEN, MBCHB (M.D.), PH.D. AND CARL L. G. HANSEN, PH.D. AS THE

CLASS II DIRECTORS, TO SERVE FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM ENDING AT THE

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD IN 2025.

Directors Continuing in Office

The following table and narrative information identifies our directors continuing in office, and sets forth their principal occupation and business experience during the last five years and their ages as of April 1, 2022.

Véronique Lecault, Ph.D.

Chief Operating Officer and Director

2018

Class I—2024

John S. Montalbano, CFA

Director

2020

Class III—2023

Peter Thiel

Director

2020

Class III—2023

Andrew Lo, Ph.D.

Director

2021

Class I—2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Class III Directors (Terms Expire at 2023 Annual Meeting)

John S. Montalbano CFA. Mr. Montalbano has served as a member of our Board of Directors since November 2020 and is the Chair of our Audit Committee and a member of our Compensation Committee. Mr. Montalbano has served as a member of the Board of Directors for each of Aritzia Inc., a public fashion company, since July 2019. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Montalbano served as the Chief Executive Officer of RBC Global Asset Management from 2008 to 2015, and as the President of Phillips, Hager & North Investment Management Ltd., a private wealth management firm, from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Montalbano also served as Vice Chair of RBC Wealth Management from April 2015 to December 2016. Mr. Montalbano holds a B.Comm. in Finance from the University of British Columbia. We believe Mr. Montalbano is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors due to his leadership, experience as an entrepreneur, and financial expertise.

Peter Thiel. Mr. Thiel has served as a member of our Board of Directors since October 2020. Mr. Thiel serves as Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. He has served as president of Thiel Capital, an investment firm, since 2011 and as a partner of Founders Fund, a venture capital firm, since 2005. In 1998, Mr. Thiel co-founded PayPal, Inc., an online payment company, where he served as Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of its Board of Directors from 2000 until its acquisition by eBay in 2002. Mr. Thiel currently serves on the Board of Directors of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. Mr. Thiel holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Stanford University and a J.D. from Stanford Law School. We believe Mr. Thiel is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors due to his leadership and experience as an entrepreneur and venture capitalist.

Class I Directors (Terms Expire at 2024 Annual Meeting)

Véronique Lecault, Ph.D. Dr. Lecault is a co-founder and has served in various positions with us since November 2012, most recently as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2019 and as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2018. Dr. Lecault has also served as Vice President of our wholly owned biotechnology subsidiary, Lineage Biosciences Inc., since January 2018 and Director of our wholly owned biotechnology subsidiary, Trianni Inc., since November 2020. Dr. Lecault has also served as a director of our wholly owned Australian biotechnology subsidiary, Channel Biologics Pty. Ltd, since September 2019. Dr. Lecault received her Ph.D. in Chemical and Biological Engineering from the University of British Columbia, where she co-invented the high-throughput microfluidic platform that is now part of our core technology. Dr. Lecault holds a B.A.Sc. in Chemical Engineering/Honours B.Sc. Biochemistry (Biotechnology) dual degree from the University of Ottawa. We believe Dr. Lecault is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of the perspective and experience she brings as an officer and as one of our co-founders.

Andrew Lo, Ph.D. Dr. Lo is the Charles E. and Susan T. Harris Professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, director of the MIT Laboratory for Financial Engineering, a principal investigator at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and an affiliated faculty member of the MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and has served as a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management and MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science since 1988. He is also an external faculty member of the Santa Fe Institute and a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. Dr. Lo currently serves on the Board of Directors of BridgeBio Pharma and Roivant Sciences, Inc., both clinical-stage biopharmaceutical companies, and Atomwise, an AI-powered drug discovery company. Dr. Lo holds a B.A. in Economics from Yale University and a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University. Dr. Lo’s qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience as a professor and a leader at two premier educational institutions.

There are no family relationships between or among any of our directors or executive officers. The principal occupation and employment during the past five years of each of our directors was carried on, in each case except as specifically identified above, with a corporation or organization that is not a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of us. There is no arrangement or understanding between any of our directors and any other person or persons pursuant to which he or she is to be selected as a director.

There are no material legal proceedings to which any of our directors is a party adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries or in which any such person has a material interest adverse to us or our subsidiaries.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

The following table identifies our executive officers who are not directors, and sets forth their current positions at the Company and their ages as of April 1, 2021.

Name	Position Held	Officer Since	Age
Andrew Booth	Chief Financial Officer	2019	48
Tryn Stimart	Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary	2019	52
Neil Berkley	Chief Business Officer	2021	48
Neil Aubuchon	Chief Commercial Officer	2021	52

Andrew Booth. Mr. Booth has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2019, and previously served as a member of our Board of Directors from June 2016 to August 2019. From February 2017 to July 2019, Mr. Booth also served as the Chief Commercial Officer of STEMCELL Technologies Inc., a Vancouver-based private biotechnology company, and as the Chief Financial Officer of STEMCELL Technologies from March 2013 to January 2017, and as the VP, Instrumentation from January 2010 to February 2013. Prior to STEMCELL, Mr. Booth was at GE Healthcare based in London, UK leading M&A activities for EMEA and GE Lifesciences. Mr. Booth was at GE from 2004 to 2009. Mr. Booth has also previously served as a member of the Board of Directors of various private companies in the life sciences sector. Mr. Booth holds an MBA from INSEAD, France, and a B.A.Sc. in Engineering Physics from the University of British Columbia.

Tryn Stimart. Mr. Stimart has served as our Chief Legal Officer and corporate secretary since August 2019 and our Chief Compliance Officer since December 2020. Prior to joining AbCellera, Mr. Stimart was a partner at Gibbons P.C., a law firm, from October 2016 to August 2019. From May 2013 to September 2016, Mr. Stimart was a partner at Womble Bond, LLP, a law firm. Mr. Stimart holds a J.D. from the American University Washington College of Law, an M.Sc. in Chemistry from Old Dominion University, and B.Scs. degrees in Biochemistry and Genetics & Cell Biology from the University of Minnesota (twin cities).

Neil Berkley. Mr. Berkley has served as our Chief Business officer since August 2021. Prior to joining AbCellera, from April 2019 to June 2021, Mr. Berkley was Vice President, Head of Business Development at Halozyme Therapeutics, a public biotechnology company focused on enabling platforms for the pharmaceutical industry. Prior to Halozyme, from February 2018 to April 2019 Mr. Berkley held various business development and corporate development roles at Axerovision, COI (Avalon Incubator), and Acadia. Mr. Berkley was Executive Director of Business development at GlaxoSmithKline from August 2014 to February 2018. Earlier in his career, Mr. Berkley was Head of Business development at Cadence Pharmaceuticals, where he helped sell the company for $1.3B in cash. Mr. Berkley also co-founded two San Diego-based biotechnology companies, Mpex Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Aptalis) and Vaxiion (a clinical stage bladder cancer company). Mr. Berkley holds a BS in molecular biology from the UC San Diego, as well as an MS in cellular and molecular biology and an MBA from San Diego State University.

Neil Aubuchon. Prior to joining AbCellera, from June 2017 to December 2021, Mr. Aubuchon was the Global Marketing Lead for Amgen's General Medicine early portfolio, which included responsibility for developing the integrated strategy for Amgen's non-oncology therapeutic areas and leading commercial strategy for over 10 biologics, as well as several high-profile corporate initiatives. Prior to Amgen, from February 2015 to May 2015, Mr. Aubuchon was the Vice President of Global Marketing at Santen, a global ophthalmology-focused pharmaceutical company. Prior to Santen, Mr. Aubuchon spent close to 17 years at Eli Lilly, from May 1998 to January 2015, in various commercial roles of increasing responsibility. This included the Chief Marketing Officer in Australia, Chief Marketing Officer in Japan, Head of Strategy & Operations for Lilly Bio-Medicines Globally, and Vice President of Lilly Bio-Medicines in Japan. Mr. Aubuchon holds a BA in Political Science from the University of Western Ontario and an MBA from the University of Toronto.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NO. 2 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP

AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE

FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022

Our shareholders are being asked to ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. KPMG LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2017.

The Audit Committee is solely responsible for selecting our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Shareholder approval is not required to appoint KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Board of Directors believes that submitting the appointment of KPMG LLP to the shareholders for ratification is good corporate governance. If the shareholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain KPMG LLP. If the selection of KPMG LLP is ratified, the Audit Committee, at its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time it decides that such a change would be in the best interest of our company and its shareholders.

A representative of KPMG LLP is expected to be present at the virtual Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and to respond to appropriate questions from our shareholders.

The following table sets forth all fees paid or accrued by us for professional audit services and other services rendered by KPMG LLP during the years ended December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2021.

	2020	2021
Audit fees⁽¹⁾	$1,471,560	$973,950
Audit-related fees⁽²⁾	—	—
Tax fees⁽³⁾	119,942	85,682
All other fees	—	—
Total fees⁽⁴⁾	$1,591,502	$1,059,632

(1)

Audit fees consist of fees for professional services provided by KPMG LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of interim consolidated financial statements and consultations on accounting matters directly related to the audit, and comfort letters, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.

(2)	Fees not included in audit fees that are billed by the auditor for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the financial statements.

(3)	Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services in connection with tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice, including the review and preparation of our federal, state and foreign income tax returns and requests for rulings or technical advice from tax authorities.

(4)	Fees paid in Canadian dollars have been converted to U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate of $0.745 for the year ended December 31, 2020, and $0.798 for the year ended December 31, 2021, respectively, based on Bank of Canada average exchange rates.

Audit Committee Pre-approval Policy and Procedures

Our Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. This policy provides that we will not engage our independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or non-audit services unless the service is specifically approved in advance by our Audit Committee or the engagement is entered into pursuant to the pre-approval procedure described below.

From time to time, our Audit Committee may pre-approve specified types of services that are expected to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm during the next 12 months. Any such pre-approval details the particular service or type of services to be provided and is also generally subject to a maximum dollar amount.

During our 2021 and 2020 fiscal years, no services were provided to us by KPMG LLP other than in accordance with the pre-approval policies and procedures described above.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 2 TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NO. 3 – NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Our Board of Directors is committed to excellence in governance. Now that we no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company,” we are required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, to solicit our shareholders, at least once every three (3) years, to vote, with an opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, or a “Say-On-Pay Vote”, as disclosed in this proxy statement. As part of that commitment and as required, our Board of Directors is providing the shareholders with an opportunity to partake, on a non-binding advisory basis, in a Say-On-Pay Vote.

As described below under “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” we have developed a compensation program that is designed to attract and retain key executives responsible for our success and motivate management to enhance long-term shareholder value. The executive compensation program is designed to reward short-term and long-term performance and to align the financial interests of our executive officers with the interests of our shareholders. We believe our executive compensation program strikes an appropriate balance between the implementation of responsible, measured compensation practices and the effective provision of incentives for our named executive officers to exert their best efforts for our success.

We are asking for shareholder approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, which includes the disclosures in the “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” sections, the compensation tables, and the narrative discussion following the compensation tables in this Proxy Statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. For the reasons discussed above, our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that our shareholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders hereby approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2021, and the other compensation-related tables and the narratives that accompany such tables.”

As this vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, and neither our Board of Directors nor the Compensation Committee will be required to take any action as a result of the outcome of this vote. However, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinion of our shareholders, and the Compensation Committee will carefully consider the outcome of this vote when evaluating our executive compensation policies and practices and making future compensation decisions.

Vote Required

For approval, this proposal must receive the affirmative vote of the majority of shares properly cast on the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on Proposal 3.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” THE NON-BINDING ADVISORY RESOLUTION IN PROPOSAL NO. 3 APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NO. 4 – ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Now that we no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company,” we are required, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Section 14A(a)(2) of the Exchange Act to solicit our shareholders at least once every six (6) years to determine the frequency of Say-On-Pay Votes. Accordingly, we are asking our shareholders to indicate whether they would prefer a Say-On-Pay Vote every year, every two (2) years or every three (3) years. Alternatively, shareholders may abstain from casting a vote. For the reasons described below, the Board recommends that the shareholders select a frequency for a Say-On-Pay Vote of every year.

After careful consideration, our Board of Directors has determined that holding a nonbinding Say-On-Pay Vote every year is in the best interest of our shareholders. For the reason below, the Board of Directors believes that, of the three choices, submitting a non-binding, advisory say-on-pay resolution to shareholders every year is the most appropriate choice. We believe that Say-On-Pay Votes should be conducted every year so that shareholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program, and accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that this vote be held every year. It should be noted, however, that shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board of Directors’ recommendation on this matter. The Compensation Committee, which administers our executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by shareholders in these votes and will continue to consider the outcome of these votes in making its decisions on executive compensation.

Accordingly, our Board of Directors is asking shareholders to indicate their preferred voting frequency by voting for every year, every two years or every three years in response to the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the alternative of every one year, two years, or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders in person or by proxy at this meeting will be deemed the preferred frequency with which the Company is to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers”.

For the reason discussed above, our Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote to hold the Say-On-Pay Vote every year. Shareholders are not voting, however, to approve or disapprove of this particular recommendation. The proxy card provides for four choices and shareholders are entitled to vote on whether the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation should be held every one, two, or three years, or to abstain from voting.

As this vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon our Board of Directors, and our Board of Directors may decide that it is in the best interest of our shareholders to hold a Say-On-Pay Vote more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our shareholders. The vote will not be construed to create or imply any change or addition to our fiduciary duties or those of our Board or the compensation committee. However, our Board of Directors will carefully consider the outcome of this vote when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

Vote Required

A plurality of votes cast is necessary for the approval of the advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. This means that the option that receives the most votes will be recommended by the shareholders to the Board of Directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on Proposal 4.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR HOLDING THE NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION “EVERY ONE YEAR.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Nomination Process

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to serve as directors, consistent with criteria approved by our board, and recommending such persons to be nominated for election as directors, except where we are legally required by contract, law or otherwise to provide third parties with the right to nominate.

The process followed by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to identify and evaluate director candidates includes requests to board members and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates, and interviews of selected candidates by management, recruiters, members of the committee and our board. The qualifications, qualities and skills that our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes must be met by a committee-recommended nominee for a position on our Board of Directors include:

•	The nominee shall have experience at a strategic or policymaking level in a business, government, non-profit or academic organization of high standing.

•	The nominee shall be highly accomplished in his or her respective field, with superior credentials and recognition.

•	The nominee shall be well regarded in the community and shall have a long-term reputation for the high ethical and moral standards.

•	The nominee shall have sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of the Company, particularly in light of the number of boards of directors on which such nominee may serve.

•	To the extent such nominee serves or has previously served on other boards, the nominee shall have a demonstrated history of actively contributing at board meetings.

Our articles contain certain “advance notice” provisions with respect to the election of our directors. These provisions are intended to: (i) facilitate orderly and efficient annual general meetings or, where the need arises, special meetings; (ii) ensure that all our shareholders receive adequate notice of board nominations and sufficient information with respect to all nominees; and (iii) allow our shareholders to vote on an informed basis. Only persons who are nominated by shareholders in accordance with our advance notice provisions will be eligible for election as directors at any annual meeting of our shareholders, or at any special meeting of our shareholders if one of the purposes for which the special meeting was called was the election of directors.

Under our advance notice provisions, a shareholder wishing to nominate a director would be required to provide us with notice, in a prescribed form and within prescribed time periods. These time periods include, (i) in the case of an annual meeting of shareholders (including annual and special meetings), not less than thirty (30) days prior to the date of the annual meeting of shareholders; provided that if the first public announcement of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders, which we refer to as the notice date, is less than fifty (50) days before the meeting date, not later than the close of business on the tenth (10^th) day following the notice date; and (ii) in the case of a special meeting (which is not also an annual meeting) of shareholders called for any purpose which includes electing directors, not later than the close of business on the fifteenth (15^th) day following the notice date.

Director Independence

Our common shares are listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. Under the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq, Marketplace Rules, or the Nasdaq Listing Rules, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s Board of Directors. In addition, the Nasdaq Listing Rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees be independent. Audit committee members must also satisfy additional independence criteria, including those set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, and compensation committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act. Under the Nasdaq Listing Rules, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s Board of Directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

under the Exchange Act, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the Board of Directors, or any other board committee: (i) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries, other than compensation for board service; or (ii) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries. In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10C-1, the Board of Directors must consider, for each member of a compensation committee of a listed company, all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to such company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including, but not limited to: the source of compensation of the director, including any consulting advisory or other compensatory fee paid by such company to the director, and whether the director is affiliated with the company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates.

Our Board of Directors has undertaken a review of the composition of our Board of Directors and its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our Board of Directors has determined that Drs. Hayden and Lo, and Messrs. Montalbano and Thiel are independent directors, including for purposes of Nasdaq and the SEC rules. In making that determination, our Board of Directors considered the relationships that each director has with us and all other facts and circumstances the Board of Directors deemed relevant in determining independence, including the potential deemed beneficial ownership of our capital shares by each director, including non-employee directors that are affiliated with certain of our major shareholders. The composition and functioning of our Board of Directors and each of our committees complies with all applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules and the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating and corporate governance committee, each of which operates pursuant to a charter adopted by our Board of Directors. The composition and functioning of all of our committees comply with the applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules, SOX, and SEC rules and regulations. We intend to comply with future requirements to the extent they become applicable to us. The full text of our audit committee charter, compensation committee charter, and nominating and corporate governance committee charter are posted on the investor relations portion of our website www.abcellera.com.

Audit Committee

Our audit committee is comprised of Mr. Montalbano, Dr. Lo and Dr. Hayden and is chaired by Mr. Montalbano. The functions of the audit committee include:

•	appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm;

•	pre-approving auditing and permissible non-audit services, and the terms of such services, to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm;

•	reviewing the overall audit plan with our independent registered public accounting firm and members of management responsible for preparing our financial statements;

•	reviewing and discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures as well as critical accounting policies and practices used by us;

•	coordinating the oversight and reviewing the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting;

•	establishing policies and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting-related complaints and concerns;

•	recommending based upon the audit committee’s review and discussions with management and our independent registered public accounting firm whether our audited financial statements shall be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K;

•	monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to our financial statements and accounting matters;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•	preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules to be included in our annual proxy statement;

•	reviewing material related person transactions for potential conflict of interest situations and approving such transactions; and

•	reviewing quarterly earnings releases.

All members of our audit committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, the Nasdaq Listing Rules. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Montalbano qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of applicable SEC regulations. In making this determination, our Board of Directors considered the nature and scope of experience that Mr. Montalbano has previously had with public reporting companies, including service as a Chief Executive Officer of other public and private companies. Our Board of Directors has determined that all directors that are members of our audit committee satisfy the relevant independence requirements for service on the audit committee set forth in the rules of the SEC, the Nasdaq Listing Rules and applicable Canadian laws. Both our independent registered public accounting firm and management will periodically meet privately with our audit committee.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee is comprised of Dr. Hayden and Mr. Montalbano and is chaired by Dr. Hayden. Each member of our compensation committee is a non-employee director, as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The functions of the compensation committee include:

•	annually reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer;

•

evaluating the performance of our Chief Executive Officer in light of such corporate goals and objectives and based on such evaluation (i) reviewing and determining the cash compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and (ii) reviewing and approving grants and awards to our Chief Executive Officer under equity-based plans;

•	reviewing and approving the compensation of our other executive officers;

•	reviewing and establishing our overall management compensation, philosophy and policy;

•	overseeing and administering our compensation and similar plans;

•	evaluating and assessing potential and current compensation advisors in accordance with the independence standards identified in the applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules;

•	reviewing and approving our policies and procedures for the grant of equity-based awards;

•	reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors the compensation of our directors;

•	preparing our compensation committee report if and when required by SEC rules;

•	reviewing and discussing annually with management our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” if and when required, to be included in our annual proxy statement; and

•	reviewing and approving the retention or termination of any consulting firm or outside advisor to assist in the evaluation of compensation matters.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Mr. Thiel and Drs. Hansen and Hayden and Mr. Montalbano and is chaired by Mr. Thiel. The functions of the nominating and corporate governance committee include:

•	developing and recommending to the Board of Directors criteria for board and committee membership;

•	establishing procedures for identifying and evaluating Board of Director candidates, including nominees recommended by shareholders;

•	reviewing the composition of the Board of Directors to ensure that it is composed of members containing the appropriate skills and expertise to advise us;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•	identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors;

•	recommending to the Board of Directors the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to each of the board’s committees;

•	developing and recommending to the Board of Directors a code of business conduct and ethics and a set of corporate governance guidelines; and

•	overseeing the evaluation of our Board of Directors.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for Board of Director membership suggested by its members and the Chief Executive Officer. Additionally, in selecting nominees for directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review candidates recommended by shareholders in the same manner and using the same general criteria as candidates recruited by the committee and/or recommended by our Board of Directors. Any shareholder who wishes to recommend a candidate for consideration by the committee as a nominee for director should follow the procedures described later in this proxy statement under the heading “Shareholder Proposals.” The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider whether to nominate any person proposed by a shareholder in accordance with the provisions of our articles relating to shareholder nominations as described later in this proxy statement under the heading “Shareholder Proposals.”

Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees. Our Board of Directors is responsible for filling vacancies on our Board of Directors and for nominating candidates for election by our shareholders each year in the class of directors whose term expires at the relevant annual meeting. The Board of Directors delegates the selection and nomination process to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, with the expectation that other members of the Board of Directors, and of management, will be requested to take part in the process as appropriate.

Generally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies candidates for director nominees in consultation with management, through the use of search firms or other advisors, through the recommendations submitted by shareholders or through such other methods as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems to be helpful to identify candidates. Once candidates have been identified, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee confirms that the candidates meet all of the minimum qualifications for director nominees established by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may gather information about the candidates through interviews, detailed questionnaires, comprehensive background checks or any other means that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems to be appropriate in the evaluation process. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then meets as a group to discuss and evaluate the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall composition and needs of our Board of Directors. Based on the results of the evaluation process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends candidates for the Board of Directors’ approval to fill a vacancy or as director nominees for election to the Board of Directors by our shareholders each year in the class of directors whose term expires at the relevant annual meeting.

Board Diversity

As required by rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market that were approved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in August 2021, we are providing information about the gender and demographic diversity of our directors in the format required by Nasdaq rules.

The information in the matrix below is based solely on information provided by our directors about their gender and demographic self-identification as of April 28, 2022. Directors who indicated that they preferred not to answer a question are shown as “did not disclose gender” or “did not disclose demographic background” below.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I: Gender Identity

Directors

Part II: Demographic Background

African American

Alaskan Native

Asian

Black

Hispanic

Latino

Native American

Native Hawaiian

Pacific Islander

White

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

LGBTQ+

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

Board and Committee Meetings Attendance

The full Board of Directors met seven (7) times during 2021. During 2021, each member of the Board of Directors attended in person or participated in 75% or more of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors (held during the period for which such person has been a director) and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board of Directors on which such person served (during the periods that such person served).

Policy on Trading and Hedging of Company Shares

Certain transactions in our securities (such as purchases and sales of publicly traded put and call options, and short sales) create a heightened compliance risk or could create the appearance of misalignment between management and shareholders. Our insider trading policy expressly prohibits our executive officers, directors and designated employees and consultants from engaging in certain prohibited transactions, including short sales, purchases or sales of derivative securities or hedging transactions.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our employees, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions), agents and representatives, including directors and consultants. A current copy of the code is posted on the Investor Relations section of our website, which is located at www.abcellera.com. If we make any substantive amendments to, or grant any waivers from, the code of business conduct and ethics for any officer or director, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website or in a current report on Form 8-K.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Board Leadership Structure

The Board of Directors believes that currently, it is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to combine the roles of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer. However, there is no formal policy regarding the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

combination or separation of these roles. The Board of Directors believes that Dr. Hansen’s leadership in the field, and daily involvement in managing the Company as the Chief Executive Officer, makes him best suited to also serve as Chairperson and guide the Board of Directors in setting priorities and addressing risks and challenges.

Risk Oversight

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including risks relating to our financial condition, development and commercialization activities, operations, strategic direction and intellectual property as more fully discussed in the filings we make with the SEC. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks we face, while our Board of Directors, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, our Board of Directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed.

The role of the Board of Directors in overseeing the management of our risks is conducted primarily through committees of the Board of Directors, as disclosed in the descriptions of each of the committees below and in the charters of each of the committees. The full Board of Directors (or the appropriate board committee in the case of risks that are under the purview of a particular committee) discusses with management our major risk exposures, their potential impact on us, and the steps we take to manage them. When a board committee is responsible for evaluating and overseeing the management of a particular risk or risks, the chairperson of the relevant committee reports on the discussion to the full Board of Directors during the committee reports portion of the next board meeting. This enables the Board of Directors and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships.

Communication with our Board of Directors

Any interested party with concerns about our Company may report such concerns to the Board of Directors or the lead director of our Board of Directors and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, by submitting a written communication to the attention of such director at the following address:

c/o AbCellera Biologics Inc.

2215 Yukon Street

Vancouver, BC V5Y 0A1

You may submit your concern anonymously or confidentially by postal mail. You may also indicate whether you are a shareholder or other interested party.

A copy of any such written communication may also be forwarded to our Chief Legal Officer and a copy of such communication may be retained for a reasonable period of time. The director may discuss the matter with our Chief Legal Officer, outside legal counsel, independent advisors, with non-management directors, or with our management, or may take other action or no action as the director determines in good faith, using reasonable judgment, and applying his or her own discretion.

Communications may be forwarded to other directors if they relate to important substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that may be important for other directors to know. In general, communications relating to corporate governance and long-term corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded than communications relating to ordinary business affairs, personal grievances, and matters as to which we tend to receive repetitive or duplicative communications.

The Audit Committee oversees the procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by our company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or audit matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. We have also established a toll-free telephone number for the reporting of such activity, which is +1 (877) 458-7914.

Board and Committee Evaluations

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual board and committee evaluation process. Generally, the Board of Directors and each committee conduct self-evaluations through a variety of means. Responses are summarized and provided to the Board of Directors and each committee at their meetings

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in order to facilitate an examination and discussion by the Board of Directors and each committee of the effectiveness of the board and committees, Board of Directors and committee structure and dynamics, and areas for possible improvement. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee establishes the Board of Directors and committee evaluation process each year and may determine to use an independent third-party evaluation process from time to time in the future.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, we did not provide any compensation to our employee directors or non-employee director affiliated with DCVC Bio and Founders Fund for their services on our Board of Directors and did not have a formal program for compensating our other non-employee directors prior to our initial public offering.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

In connection with our initial public offering, our Board of Directors adopted a non-employee director compensation policy. The policy is designed to enable us to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, highly qualified non-employee directors. Under the policy, our non-employee directors will be eligible to receive cash retainers (which will be prorated for partial years of service) and equity awards as set forth below:

Annual Retainer for Board Membership
Annual service on the Board of Directors			$40,000
Additional retainer for annual service as non-executive chairperson or lead director of the Board of Directors			$30,000
Additional Annual Retainer for Committee Membership
Annual service as audit committee chairperson			$20,000
Annual service as member of the audit committee (other than chair)			$10,000
Annual service as compensation committee chairperson			$15,000
Annual service as member of the compensation committee (other than chair)			$7,500
Annual service as nominating and corporate governance committee chairperson			$10,000
Annual service as member of the nominating and corporate governance committee (other than chair)			$5,000

In addition, our policy provides that, upon initial election or appointment to our Board of Directors, each new non-employee director will be granted a one-time grant of either a non-statutory share option to purchase our common shares, restricted share units, or a combination thereof, with an aggregate targeted grant date fair value of $800,000 on the date of such director’s election or appointment to the Board of Directors, or the Director Initial Grant. The Director Initial Grant will vest in substantially equal annual installments over three years. On the date of each annual meeting of shareholders of our company following the completion of the IPO, each non-employee director who will continue as a non-employee director following such meeting will be granted an annual award of either a non-statutory share option to purchase our common shares, restricted share units, or a combination thereof, with an aggregate targeted grant date fair value of $400,000, or the Director Annual Grant. The Director Annual Grant will vest in full on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the grant date or on the date of our next annual meeting of shareholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to the Director Annual Grants to be made at the annual meeting of shareholders occurring in 2021 and 2022, such Director Annual Grants will occur in December of the year immediately prior to the year of the applicable annual meeting, and such Director Annual Grants shall vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. The Director Initial Grant and Director Annual Grant are subject to full acceleration of vesting upon the sale of our company.

We reimburse all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by directors for their attendance at meetings of our Board of Directors or any committee thereof.

Employee directors will receive no additional compensation for their service as a director.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the total compensation that was earned by or paid to each of our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. Dr. Hansen, who is our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Dr. Lecault, who is our Chief Operating Officer, did not receive any additional compensation for their services as director. The compensation received by Drs. Hansen Lecault, as NEOs of our company, is presented in “Executive Compensation—2021 Summary Compensation Table” below.

Name⁽¹⁾	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)⁽³⁾	Option Award ($)⁽²⁾	All Other Compensation $	Total ($)
Michael Hayden, MBCHB (M.D.), Ph.D.⁽⁴⁾	97,750	380,979	—	478,729⁽⁷⁾
	—	400,000	—	400,000⁽⁸⁾
John S. Montalbano CFA⁽⁵⁾	60,000	380,979	—	440,979⁽⁷⁾
	—	400,000	—	400,000⁽⁸⁾
Andrew Lo, Ph. D.⁽⁶⁾	3,940	799,990	—	803,930⁽⁹⁾

(1)	As of December 31, 2021, Mr. Thiel and Dr. Hamer did not receive any compensation or hold any outstanding equity awards. Dr. Hamer resigned from the Board, effective December 7, 2021.

(2)

The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock options granted to our directors during the 2021 fiscal year, calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718. Such grant date fair values do not take into account any estimated forfeitures. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the stock options reported in this column are set forth in Note 12 of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. The amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these stock options and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by our directors upon the exercise of the stock options or any sale of the underlying common shares.

(3)

Amounts paid are made pursuant to the Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation policy, effective as of February 23, 2021. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mr. Montalbano became a member of our compensation committee on December 7, 2021, and waived the right to earn any compensation for his services on our compensation committee in 2021.

(4)	As of December 31, 2021, Dr. Hayden held outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 179,814 shares of Company common stock.

(5)	As of December 31, 2021, Mr. Montalbano held outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 579,814 shares of Company common stock.

(6)	As of December 31, 2021, Dr. Lo held outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 91,325 shares of Company common stock.

(7)	Reflects fees earned in 2021 and stock options awarded in 2021 for 2021 service.

(8)	Reflects stock options awarded in December 2021 for 2022 service.

(9)	Reflects fees earned in 2021 and initial director stock option awarded in 2021 vesting over 3 years of service.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion & Analysis

Overview

We became a public company in December 2020, and we filed our initial definitive proxy statement under the scaled disclosure reporting rules applicable to emerging growth companies. As of the close of calendar year 2021, we ceased to be an emerging growth company and, therefore, this year’s definitive proxy statement includes additional information regarding our executive compensation program that was previously not required, including:

•	this Compensation Discussion and Analysis; and

•	additional compensation tables for “2021 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table,” “2021 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table,” and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans and expectations regarding our future compensation programs. The actual amount and form of compensation that we pay and the compensation policies and practices that we adopt in the future may differ materially from the currently-planned programs that are summarized in this discussion.

The compensation provided to our named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2020 and 2021 is detailed in the 2021 Summary Compensation Table and accompanying footnotes and narrative that follow. Our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, which consists of our Chief Executive Officer and our four most highly-compensated individuals (other than our Chief Executive Officer) who were serving as executive officers on December 31, 2021, are:

•	Carl L.G. Hansen, Ph.D., our Chief Executive Officer;

•	Andrew Booth, our Chief Financial Officer; and

•	Véronique Lecault, Ph D., our Chief Operating Officer;

•	Tryn Stimart, our Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary; and

•	Neil Berkley, our Chief Business Officer.

2021 Corporate Performance highlights

Our mission is to improve health with technologies that transform the way that antibody-based therapies are discovered. Our business thesis is based on the belief that technological advancement can improve the drug development process and that maximizing the value and impact of our work is best achieved through partnerships. In 2021, our first full year as a publicly listed company, we made significant advancements, executing on our long-term strategy by growing our portfolio, deepening our platform to unlock new modalities, and expanding our deal structures to add new ways to capture value.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In 2021, we accomplished the following key items that support our mission and goals:

•	Started discovery on 26 programs, bringing the cumulative number of program starts to 78.

•	Entered into key partnerships with Tachyon and EQRx where AbCellera has the option to invest in programs at various stages of preclinical development, clinical development, and commercialization in exchange for an increased share of product sales.

•	Entered into a multi-year, multi-target research collaboration and license agreement with Moderna Inc. to identify therapeutic antibodies against up to six targets selected by Moderna.

•	Achieved a cumulative total of 156 programs under contract with 36 partners.

•

Bamlanivimab (LY-CoV555) 700 mg, a human antibody discovered by AbCellera and developed with Eli Lilly and Company received EUA from the FDA. Bamlanivimab administered alone was subsequently paused, then Bamlanivimab administered together with a second Eli Lilly antibody, Etesevimab (LY-CoV016) 1400 mg, received EUA. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, the use of Bamlanivimab administered both alone and as a combination therapy with Etesevimab, has been paused as a result of the emergence of new variants.

•	AbCellera developed a second antibody, Bebtelovimab (also known as LY-CoV1404), which received EUA from the FDA in February 2022. Bebtelovimab neutralizes against Omicron and all other known variants of interest and concern, including the subvariant BA.2.

•	Reached a cumulative total of five molecules in the clinic across oncology, infectious disease, animal health, and immunology, dermatology and gastrointestinal disease.

•	Acquired TetraGenetics Inc. in September 2021 to expand capabilities for high-value transmembrane protein targets.

•	Expanded the leadership team with the appointment of Neil Berkley as Chief Business Officer, Neil Aubuchon as Chief Commercial Officer, and appointed Andrew Lo, Ph.D., to our Board of Directors.

Key Compensation Decisions and Actions

Our Compensation Committee took the following decisions and actions in 2021 related to our NEO compensation:

Compensation Area	Highlights
Cash Compensation	•	Approved a combination of merit salary increases and market adjustments for certain of our NEOs
	•	Approved compensation for our newly appointed Chief Business Officer
Equity Compensation	•	Granted our existing NEOs competitive annual stock awards consisting of option grants and restricted stock units with a 4-year vesting schedule
	•	Granted new hire awards consisting of stock options and restricted stock units with 4-year vesting schedules to our newly appointed Chief Business Officer
Process & Governance	•	Updated the peer group of comparable companies
	•	Engaged Aon’s Human Capital Solutions Practice, a division of Aon plc., as the Compensation Committees independent advisor
	•	Adapted our Insider Trading Policy to limit use of company securities as collateral without advance notice to Compliance Officer, and without board approval if loan exceeds 20% of securities used as collateral

Organizational Changes

The Compensation Committee approved changes for our NEOs during 2021 to enhance our ability to execute on our mission and strategy.

•	In February 2021, Ester Falconer, Ph. D., was appointed to Chief Technology Officer. Dr. Falconer went on family leave in June 2021 and in November 2021, the Company accepted her resignation as Chief Technology Officer. The Chief Technology Officer position has not been filled.

•	In July 2021, Neil Berkley was appointed as our Chief Business Officer.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Key Compensation Governance Attributes

The Compensation Committee believes that our compensation program must be underpinned by sound practices and processes that align with our compensation philosophy, objectives, and bolster our overall governance and risk management framework. A summary of these key features includes:

•	Providing a majority of compensation in long-term incentives that have multi-year vesting schedules

•	No history of option repricing or backdating

•	No hedging of Company shares

•	No use of Company securities as collateral without Board approval if loan exceeds 20% of pledged securities

•	Providing a competitive mix of fixed (e.g., base salary) and variable (e.g., bonus) compensation

•	Establishing a relevant peer group to serve as market. comparator for key compensation metrics

•	Not guaranteeing salary increases or bonuses

•	Limiting executive perquisites, and no defined benefit pension plans or other post-employment benefit plans

•	Consulting with an independent compensation consultant

“Say-on-Pay” Vote on Executive Compensation

In prior years, we were an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 and were not required to hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs (a “Say-on-Pay Vote”). At this Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we will hold our first Say-on-Pay Vote as described in Proposal 3 of this proxy statement. Our Board and Compensation Committee will consider the result of the Say-on-Pay vote, and the related “Say-on-Frequency” vote, as well as feedback received throughout the year, when making compensation decisions for our executive officers in the future because we value the opinions of our shareholders.

APPROACH TO COMPENSATION

Our Philosophy

At AbCellera, our people are our greatest asset. We work as a team to build an enduring company that pushes the boundaries of technology to bring best-in-class therapies to patients faster, and at scale. Our compensation philosophy is based on the pillars of our culture, with a long-term and forward-looking view of what we have set out to build together. To understand the roots of our compensation philosophy, it is important to first understand what we value:

team first we succeed as a team. we are accountable as individuals.

think independently we build our ideas on first principles and have the courage to stand apart from the crowd.

act with conviction we see opportunities. we trust ourselves. we move with purpose.

stretch and explore we thrive at the edge and embrace the unknown.

win-win in the long run, the world is not a zero-sum game.

Our executive compensation program is based on aligning with the pillars of our culture and our long-term vision. The key objectives that support this philosophy include:

Attract and retain individuals who believe in our long-term vision and are motivated by maximizing the value they bring to the world.

Challenge teams with bold and ambitious goals to help the Company achieve the best possible financial and operational results.

Reward teamwork, accountability, and excellence consistent with AbCellera’s performance on both short and long-term basis.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Recognize outstanding contributions that go above and beyond.

Align efforts and interests to amplify long-term value for shareholders, patients, and partners.

Foster growth, health, learning and development to unleash the full potential of each individual.

We accomplish these goals through a holistic view of compensation that covers multiple compensation elements including, but not limited to, base salary, cash- and share-based incentives, and health benefits. We do not target a specific mix of compensation, although we deliver a majority of compensation through long-term incentives and aim to be particularly competitive with regards to equity-based long-term incentives as it aligns with our team-based approach and long-term outlook on value creation.

To attract and retain qualified executives, we seek to provide our NEOs target pay opportunities that are competitive within our industry. Our comparative framework used peer companies in the life sciences industry with a similar business and financial profile, and broader, size appropriate comparisons in the life science industry as secondary market. We generally target compensation opportunities at the median of the market for base salary and cash bonuses but recognize that individuals may be compensated above or below the median of the market given their experience, scope of responsibility, performance, and other factors. Further, in alignment with our philosophy, we target the median to the seventy-fifth (75^th) percentile of the market for long-term incentives. Actual pay positioning will also consider internal equity and company constraints.

Process and roles

Role of the Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and overseeing our executive compensation program. Specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee can be found in the “Information Regarding the Committees of the Board” section of this proxy statement. The Compensation Committee reviews our NEO compensation packages on an annual basis or more frequently as it deems appropriate. In its review process, the Compensation Committee discusses with our Chief Executive Officer proposed compensation for all NEOs other than himself. Following the Compensation Committee’s discussions with our Chief Executive Officer, and in consideration of all information provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant and management, the Compensation Committee approves each NEO’s compensation for the upcoming fiscal year, including the performance measures and objectives to be used for purposes of determining their annual cash bonuses for the fiscal year. In addition, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the Company, and the Chief Executive Officer assesses the individual performance of each executive officer, except himself, to determine whether to pay cash bonuses for the previous fiscal year and, if so, the amount of any such bonuses.

Role of our Chief Executive Officer and Other Management Members. Our Chief Executive Officer evaluates and reviews with the Compensation Committee the individual performance and contributions of each of the other NEOs and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding base salary, short-term incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards. The Compensation Committee reviews and considers such recommendations, but ultimately retains full discretion and authority over the final compensation decisions for the NEOs. Our Chief Executive Officer also recommends the Company performance objectives that are used to determine bonus amounts of the other NEOs and consults with select members of management in the development of the goals. The Compensation Committee may request that certain executives attend portions of Compensation Committee meetings based on the topics being covered and their respective areas of expertise. NEO compensation decisions are made in executive session without the respective NEOs present.

Role of our Independent Compensation Consultant. Our Compensation Committee is authorized to engage a compensation consultant or other advisors to review our executive officers’ compensation, including an analysis against the compensation of executive officers at comparable companies, to ensure that our compensation is market competitive, with the goal of retaining and adequately motivating our senior management. During 2021, our Compensation Committee engaged Aon's Human Capital Solutions Practice, a division of Aon plc., as its independent compensation consultant to make recommendations for updating our compensation peer group, and to review and make recommendations regarding our executive and director compensation for 2021. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of its independent compensation consultant pursuant to the NASDAQ rules, and the Company concluded that Aon’s work for the Compensation Committee did not raise any conflict of interest.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Use of Market Data

The Compensation Committee makes use of various external and internal references in making its decisions. One of these references is external compensation market data related to our NEOs. In October 2020, the Compensation Committee engaged Aon to develop a peer group for use in evaluating the competitiveness of NEO compensation arrangements. Aon developed a group of 19 companies that were comparable to AbCellera at that time. The criteria used to the 19 companies were as follows:

Element		2020 Criteria
Primary	Sector & Stage	• Public, US/Canada-based commercial biotech companies, with a focus on those that have a differentiated technology platform, where possible
	Sector & Stage	• Emphasis on companies that have recently gone public in the last 3-5 years
	Revenue	• Trailing twelve-month revenues generally under $250M to reflect companies of similar scale as AbCellera, while allowing room for potential growth
	Market Capitalization	• Market capitalization in the range of 0.3x to 3.0x that of AbCellera (or approximately between $2B and $12B)
Secondary	Organizational Complexity	• Companies with generally between 100 and 1,000 employees to account for future growth based on FYE 2020 headcount of 212 employees
Secondary	Geography	• Consider broad US market for executing talent but ensure the list includes any geographic talent competitors

In October 2020, the Compensation Committee endorsed the following peer group:

10-x Genomics	Blueprint Medicines	Schrödinger
Acceleron Pharma	BridgeBio Pharma	Twist Bioscience
Adaptive Biotechnologies	CRISPR Therapeutics	Vir Biotechnology
Agios Pharmaceuticals	Denali Therapeutics	Xencor
Allogene Therapeutics	FibroGen	Zymeworks
Berkeley Lights	Inovio Pharmaceuticals
bluebird bio	Ligand Pharmaceuticals

In addition to market compensation data, the Compensation Committee also reflects on the following, as appropriate, in their decision-making process:

•	The Company’s vision, mission, strategies, and corporate goals

•	The compensation philosophy and objectives

•	Company performance and outlook

•	Broader market compensation information and data

•	Labor market trends and dynamics

•	Individual NEO roles, performance, and contributions

•	Compensation histories for individual NEOs

Compensation Program and Decisions

Compensation for our NEOs is comprised primarily of the following four main components:

Element			Summary Purpose
Base Salary			• Provide a fixed source of income commensurate with the NEO’s position at the Company
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus			• Challenge NEOs with bold and ambitious goals to help the company achieve the best possible financial and operational results
			• Reward teamwork, accountability, excellence and progress towards AbCellera’s business strategy
			• Recognize outstanding contributions that go above and beyond

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Element			Summary Purpose
Long-Term Equity Incentives			• Align efforts and interests to amplify long-term value for shareholders, patients, and partners
Long-Term Equity Incentives			• Attract and retain NEOs who believe in and are motivated by our long-term vision
Benefits			• Amplify work-life synergy by providing our NEOs with extended health benefits to maximize their wellbeing
			• Provide peace of mind with retirement benefits, life insurance as well as certain protections if we encounter a change in control or separation event
			• Foster growth, learning and development to unleash the full potential of each NEO

Annual Base Salaries

Base salaries are determined on a case-by-case basis for each NEO, including consideration of each NEO’s experience, expertise, and performance, as well as market compensation levels for similar positions. Base salaries for our NEOs are established at the time of hire, taking into account the NEO’s position and qualifications and approval of the Compensation Committee. Generally, our Compensation Committee reviews and evaluates our NEO’s base salaries each year, with input from our Chief Executive Officer (other than with respect to himself). The Compensation Committee takes into consideration the NEO’s performance, contributions, market base salary data, changes in the scope of role, overall labor market conditions, and the overall development of our company utilizing input from the Chief Executive Officer (other than with respect to himself), as well as the factors described in the “Approach to Compensation” section above.

The following table presents the base salaries for each of our NEOs for the years 2020 and 2021, as approved by our Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee approved an increase in the 2021 base salaries for each of the incumbent NEOs by the amounts set forth in the table below in recognition of a continued high level of performance in 2020 along with adjustments to bring compensation closer to other publicly-listed companies in our peer group. The increases for incumbent NEOs became effective on January 1, 2021.

	2020 Annualized Base Salary ($)	2021 Annualized Base Salary ($)	% increase	Nature of Increase
Carl L.G. Hansen, Ph.D.⁽¹⁾ Chief Executive Officer	296,155	400,000	35.1%	Annual Merit & Market Adjustment
Andrew Booth Chief Financial Officer	—	400,000	—	—
Véronique Lecault, Ph.D.⁽¹⁾ Chief Operating Officer	196,533	400,000	103.5%	Annual Merit & Market Adjustment
Tryn Stimart Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary	337,235	400,000	18.6%	Annual Merit & Market Adjustment
Neil Berkley Chief Business Officer	—	410,000	—	—

(1)	The percent increase reflects adjustments for moving from a private to public entity, in view of compensation for the comparative role around the twenty-fifth (25^th) percentile range within our peer group.

Annual Cash Incentive Bonus

AbCellera has a formal short-term incentive program that is designed to challenge NEOs with bold and ambitious goals to help the Company achieve the best possible financial and operational results, reward teamwork, accountability, excellence and progress towards AbCellera’s business strategy, and recognize outstanding contributions that go above and beyond. The program goals are intended to be measured over one year but may be accomplished at certain times during the program year. The payouts under the program are cash-based, as is customary in our industry. Under our bonus program, each NEO has a target bonus opportunity, defined as a percentage of his or her annualized base salary. The target amounts are initially set at the time of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

hire based on the individual’s role and level in the organization. These bonus targets are subject to adjustment each year based on the competitive market and our internal compensation levels and structure. The general design of our bonus program is as follows:

whereas the Bonus Multiplier is calculated as follows to recognize both components of teamwork and individual accountability:

In December 2020, our Compensation Committee reviewed the target bonus opportunities of each of our executive officers, including each of our NEOs (exclusive of Mr. Berkley, who had not yet joined the Company), and set the target bonus percentage for each such NEO as set forth in the table below effective January 1, 2021. The Compensation Committee set the target bonus percentage for Mr. Berkley in conjunction with his new employment agreement. The Compensation Committee increased the target bonus percentage to 55% for Dr. Hansen and to 40% for Mr. Booth, Dr. Lecault and Mr. Stimart in light of their performance in 2020 and to align with peer group comparatives.

	2021 Annualized Base Salary ($)	2021 Target Bonus Percentage	Corporate Achievements Weight	Individual Contribution Weight
Carl L.G. Hansen, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer	400,000	55%	100%	—
Andrew Booth Chief Financial Officer	400,000	40%	80%	20%
Véronique Lecault, Ph.D. Chief Operating Officer	400,000	40%	80%	20%
Tryn Stimart Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary	400,000	40%	80%	20%
Neil Berkley⁽¹⁾ Chief Business Officer	410,000	40%	80%	20%

(1)	Eligibility prorated from start date of July 12, 2021.

In January 2021, the Board of Director approved the 2021 corporate goals, and these were used to assess our corporate performance in 2021. The Compensation Committee believes that each of these goals is strongly aligned to the creation of shareholder value.

The 2021 performance goals were aggressive and set as stretch goals to challenge our NEOs such that the attainment of executive target annual cash incentive bonus opportunities was not assured at the time they were set and would require a high level of effort and execution on the part of the executive officers and others in order to achieve the goals. The Compensation Committee assessment also considered achievements that were not included in the original goals but brought significant value to the company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The specific corporate performance goals established for 2021 are set forth below:

2021 Corporate Goals
Capacity			• Build capacity with people, facilities, process and infrastructure to deliver on multiple partner programs per year with best-in-world capabilities
Partnership Business			• Expand portfolio with 40 new Programs Under Contract
			• Hire Chief Business Officer and establish international business development presence
			• Close high-value deals incorporating newly acquired Trianni and Orthomab platforms
Corporate Development			• Establish strong industry position with a mix of strategic partnerships, new business models, and M&A
			• Meet revenue and R&D investments targets, ending the year with a strong cash balance
			• Build finance, legal and business infrastructure to support SOX compliance and corporate growth as a publicly-listed company
Platform R&D & Forward Integration to IND			• Expand technology stack with forward integration of translational sciences, CMC development and GMP manufacturing
			• Establish full suite of technologies, capabilities and capacity to unlock high-value target classes of ion channels and GPCRs
			• Identify and develop next-gen COVID-19 mAb for emerging variants
			• Build scalable processes to capture and protect IP
Leadership			• Build learning and development programs across the company with excellence in training, management, and communication.
Leadership			• Maintain employee engagement within top 5% of industry, with voluntary turnover <5%

In light of our good performance and the challenging nature of the goals, the Compensation Committee, in its judgment, determined our corporate performance percentage to be 95% of the target performance level for 2021, based on the following assessment:

2021 Corporate Goals	Highlights	Assessment
Capacity	• Hired 180 new AbCellerites	Met most goals
Capacity	• Initiated 26 new Program Starts	Met most goals
Partnership Business	• Ended year at new 53 Programs Under Contracts	Met or exceeded all goals
	• Hired CBO and built partnering presence in San Francisco, and San Diego
	• Closed multiple deals incorporating Trianni and Orthomab platforms
Corporate Development	• Completed TetraGenetics acquisition	Met most goals
	• Closed new deal structures with equity/equity-like positions and options to co-invest
	• Ended year with strong cash position of $720M
	• Achieved SOX compliance in first year as publicly-listed company
Platform R&D & Forward Integration to IND	• Initiated CD3 effort and generated large panels of antibody candidates for bispecifics	Met or exceeded most goals
Platform R&D & Forward Integration to IND	• Bebtelovimab (LY-CoV1404) advanced to Phase II clinical trials and awaiting EUA	Met or exceeded most goals
Leadership	• Reached 99th percentile in engagement with 3% voluntary turnover	Exceeded all goals

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Based on the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the annual cash incentive bonus goals, and the CEO’s assessment of individual contributions, the Compensation Committee approved the following bonus payments to our NEOs:

	2021 Base Salary ($)⁽²⁾	2021 Target Bonus Percentage	Target Incentive ($)	Corporate Performance Weight	Corporate Performance Percentage	Individual Performance Weight	Individual Performance Percentage	Bonus Multiplier	Annual Cash Incentive Award ($)⁽²⁾
Carl L.G. Hansen, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer	400,000	55%	220,000	100%	95%	—	—	95%	209,000
Andrew Booth Chief Financial Officer	400,000	40%	160,000	80%	95%	20%	110%	98%	156,800
Véronique Lecault, Ph.D. Chief Operating Officer	400,000	40%	160,000	80%	95%	20%	110%	98%	156,800
Tryn Stimart Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer & Corporate Secretary	400,000	40%	160,000	80%	95%	20%	110%	98%	156,800
Neil Berkley⁽¹⁾ Chief Business Officer	194,129	40%	77,282	80%	95%	20%	100%	96%	74,546

(1)	Mr. Berkley started employment on July 12, 2021, and his performance-based bonus was pro-rated accordingly.

(2)

Base salary for all executives is determined in USD. The CAD base salary equivalent for our Canadian resident executives is calculated at the time the USD base salary is determined at a ratio of CAD $1.2750:USD $1.00 as set forth by the Bank of Canada on January 12, 2021 and paid evenly in CAD during the year. For our Canadian resident executives, the annual cash incentive award is determined by multiplying the bonus percentage by their CAD Base Salary, and translated here at the 2021 weighted average exchange ratio of CAD $1.2535:USD $1.00 as set forth by the Bank of Canada.

Long-term incentives

Long-term incentives represent a key element in our overall compensation program and help us achieve a number of our critical compensation program goals:

•	Align efforts and interests to amplify long-term value for shareholders, patients, and partners

•	Attract and retain NEOs who believe in and are motivated by our long-term vision

•	Reward teamwork, accountability, and excellence consistent with AbCellera’s performance.

Based on our key compensation program objectives and the general competitive market landscape, the Compensation Committee elected to grant 100% options for ongoing awards to existing Section 16 NEOs, and a mix of 50% options and 50% RSUs for initial awards to newly appointed non-Section 16 NEOs in 2021. The Compensation Committee expects to review the long-term incentive program each year and determine if changes are needed based on the growth and maturity of our company, any changes to our program objectives or philosophy, or changes in competitive market dynamics. The Compensation Committee typically approves equity grants for NEOs at the start of their employment and annually thereafter in connection with the annual performance review. Additionally, the Compensation Committee may periodically grant additional equity awards based on changes in job responsibility, performance and contribution, or other special circumstances.

The exercise price of all stock options equals the fair market value of shares of our common stock on the date of grant. Prior to the exercise of a stock option, the holder has no rights as a shareholder with respect to the shares subject to such option, including no voting rights and no right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. The vesting schedules for executive stock option grants are generally as follows:

•	Stock option grant upon hire: vests twenty-five percent (25%) after one year and the remaining portion of the grant vests monthly over the following thirty-six (36) months.

•	Annual stock option grant: vests twenty-five percent (25%) after one year and the remaining portion of the grant vests quarterly over the following thirty-six (36) months.

The vesting schedules for RSU grants are generally as follows:

•	RSU grant upon hire: vests in four (4) substantially equal annual installments.

•	Annual RSU grant: vests in four (4) substantially equal annual installments.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In each case, vesting of each installment of these awards is subject to the grantee’s continued employment or service with the Company or one of our subsidiaries through each applicable vesting date.

In determining annual long-term incentive grants for NEOs, the Compensation Committee reviews market data for annual long-term incentive grant levels and groups the NEOs accordingly, as well as considering the factors described in the “Approach to Compensation” section above. The Compensation Committee generally endeavors to provide awards that are competitive with our peer group. In December 2020, the Compensation Committee approved the grants of stock options under our 2020 Share Option and Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan”) to each of our NEOs other than Mr. Berkley, who was not hired until later in 20201 and was granted stock options and RSUs on the first trading day of the month following his start date with our Company, also under the 2020 Plan. In December 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the grants of stock options under our 2020 Plan to each of our NEOs for the upcoming year. The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the stock options or settlement of RSUs granted to our NEOs in 2021:

Named Executive Officer	Number of Stock Options Granted (#)	Exercise Price ($)	Number of RSUs Granted (#)
Carl L.G. Hansen, Ph.D.	920,312	$ 14.55	—
Andrew Booth	406,020	$ 14.55	—
Véronique Lecault, Ph.D.	406,020	$ 14.55	—
Tryn Stimart	270,680	$ 14.55	—
Neil Berkley	108,272	$ 14.55	68,729
	105,000	$ 15.82	70,000

Severance and Change of Control Benefits

Our NEOs are entitled to certain benefits if an executive’s employment terminates in certain circumstances or if a change of control occurs. We believe that such benefits are an important component of each NEO’s overall compensation as they help us to attract and retain our key executives who could have other job alternatives that may appear to them to be more attractive absent these protections. If any payment or other benefit provided to an NEO constitutes an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and would be subject to an excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, then the amounts actually paid to that NEO will be reduced to the extent that such a reduction would result in the NEO receiving a greater amount than he or she would have received if the payment had been made in full. Each NEO’s right to receive these severance benefits is subject to his providing a release of claims in favor of us. These benefits are further described under the “Estimated Payments and Benefits Upon Termination or Change of Control” section of this proxy statement.

Benefits

In November 2021 we commenced a retirement plan featuring RRSP contributions for our Canadian employees and executives, and 401(k) contributions for our American employees and executives.

Our NEOs are also eligible to participate in all our employee benefit plans, including our medical, dental, long-term disability, and term life insurance plans, in each case on the same basis as other employees. We do not sponsor any qualified or non-qualified defined benefit or deferred compensation plans for any of our employees, including NEOs.

Compensation Risk Assessment

We believe that although a portion of the compensation provided to our executive officers and other employees is performance-based, our executive compensation program does not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking. Our compensation programs are designed to encourage our executive officers and other employees to remain focused on long-term strategy while being accountable to short-term goals, in connection with our compensation philosophy. As a result, we do not believe that our compensation programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Generally, Section 162(m) of the Code (Section 162(m)) disallows a federal income tax deduction for public corporations of remuneration in excess of $1 million paid in any fiscal year to certain specified executive officers. Subject to certain transition rules which apply to remuneration provided pursuant to written binding

TABLE OF CONTENTS

contracts which were in effect on November 2, 2017, and which are not subsequently modified in any material respect and certain transition relief for newly public companies, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, the exemption from the deduction limit for “performance-based compensation” is no longer available. Consequently, for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, all remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to a specified executive will not be deductible unless it qualifies for the transition relief described above.

In designing our executive compensation program and determining the compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors, including the potential impact of the Section 162(m) deduction limit. However, the Compensation Committee will not necessarily limit executive compensation to that which is or may be deductible under Section 162(m). The deductibility of some types of compensation depends upon the timing of an executive officer’s vesting or exercise of previously granted rights. Further, interpretations of and changes in the tax laws, and other factors beyond the Compensation Committee’s control also affect the deductibility of compensation. The Compensation Committee will consider various alternatives to preserving the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits to the extent consistent with its compensation goals.

To maintain flexibility to compensate our executive officers in a manner designed to promote our short-term and long-term corporate goals, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that all compensation must be deductible. The Compensation Committee believes that our shareholders’ interests are best served if its discretion and flexibility in awarding compensation is not restricted in order to allow such compensation to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program, even though some compensation awards may result in non-deductible compensation expense.

We follow the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (FASB ASC Topic 718) for our stock-based compensation awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to our employees and non-employee members of our Board of Directors, including stock options to purchase shares of our common stock and other stock awards, based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and reported in the executive compensation tables required by the federal securities laws, even though the recipient of the awards may never realize any value from their awards.

2021 Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officers for services rendered to us in all capacities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2020, and 2021.

			Page
GENERAL INFORMATION			2
PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF CLASS II DIRECTORS			6
PROPOSAL NO. 2 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2022			10
PROPOSAL NO. 3 – NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			11
PROPOSAL NO 4 – NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			12
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			13
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION			20
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			22
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS			41
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS			42
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) reports			44
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE			45
HOUSEHOLDING			46
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS			46
OTHER MATTERS			46

No fee required.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

Fee computed in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11