UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 001-13387

Mega Matrix Corp.

(formerly known as AeroCentury Corp.)

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		94-3263974
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

3000 El Camino Real,

Bldg. 4, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA 94306

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (650) 340-1888

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Trading Symbol		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share		MTMT		NYSE American Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (based upon the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock as of such date, as reported by the NYSE American Exchange) was $ 13,217,260 . Shares of common stock held by the registrant’s officers and directors and beneficial owners of 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock have been excluded from the calculation of this amount because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant; however, the treatment of these persons as affiliates of the registrant for purposes of this calculation is not, and shall not be considered, a determination as to whether any such person is an affiliate of the registrant for any other purpose.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of March 15, 2022 was 22,084,055.

NOTE

Effective March 25, 2022, we changed our name from Aerocentury Corp. to Mega Matrix Corp. to better reflect our expansion into Metaverse and the GameFi businesses. All references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context indicates otherwise, to “AeroCentury” refers to AeroCentury Corp. and the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refers to AeroCentury together with its consolidated subsidiaries prior to March 25, 2022, and renamed “Mega Matrix Corp.” commencing on March 25, 2022, and, except where expressly noted otherwise or the context otherwise requires, its consolidated subsidiaries.

CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Any statement in this report other than statements of historical fact may be a forward-looking statement for purposes of these provisions, including any statements of the Company’s plans and objectives for future operations, the Company’s future financial condition or economic performance (including known or anticipated trends), and the assumptions underlying or related to the foregoing. Statements that include the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential,” “projected,” “intends,” “believes,” or “continue,” or the negative thereof, or other comparable terminology, are forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements in this report include statements about the following matters, although this list is not exhaustive:

●

the ongoing development of the GameFi industry and the ability of the Company and its subsidiary to continue development of such games;

●

the ability of the Company to continue compliance with the development of applicable regulatory regulations in connection with blockchain, digital asset and the GameFi industry;

●

the impact of certain industry trends on the Company and its performance;

●

the ability of the Company and its customers to comply with applicable government and regulatory requirements in the numerous jurisdictions in which the Company and its customers operate;

●

the Company’s cyber vulnerabilities and the anticipated effects on the Company if a cybersecurity threat or incident were to materialize;

●

general economic, market, political and regulatory conditions, including anticipated changes in these conditions and the impact of such changes on customer demand and other facets of the Company’s business; and

●

the impact of any of the foregoing on the prevailing market price and trading volume of the Company’s common stock.

All of the Company’s forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those projected or assumed by such forward-looking statements. Among others, the factors that could cause such differences include: the ability to develop a new business in the GameFi industry; acceptance by players of the Company’s games utilizing a “Play-to-Earn” model; the ongoing effects on the airline industry and global economy of the COVID-19 pandemic or any other public health emergencies; the impact on the industry from a terrorist attack involving air travel; the ability of the Company to raise debt or equity financing when needed on acceptable terms and in desired amounts, or at all; any noncompliance by the Company’s lessees with respect to their obligations under their respective leases, including payment obligations; any economic downturn or other financial crisis; any inability to compete effectively with the Company’s better capitalized competitors; limited trading volume in the Company’s stock. In addition, the Company operates in a competitive and evolving industry in which new risks emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Company to predict all of the risks it may face, nor can it assess the impact of all factors on its business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors could cause actual results to differ from expectations. As a result of these and other potential risks and uncertainties, the Company’s forward-looking statements should not be relied on or viewed as predictions of future events.

This cautionary statement should be read as qualifying all forward-looking statements included in this report, wherever they appear. We urge you to consider the limitations on, and risks associated with, forward-looking statements and not unduly rely on the accuracy of forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements and descriptions of risks included in this report are made as of the date hereof based on information available to the Company as of the date hereof, and except as required by applicable law, the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement or risk for any reason. You should, however, consult the risks and other disclosures described in the reports the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) after the date of this report for updated information.

Table of Contents

PART I		1

Item 1.	Business.	1

Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	5

Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	14

Item 2.	Properties.	14

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	14

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	14

PART II		15

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.	15

Item 6.	Reserved.	15

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	15

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	21

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	21

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.	21

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	21

Item 9B.	Other Information.	21

Item 9C.	Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevents Inspections.	21

PART III		22

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	22

Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	26

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	29

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.	30

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services.	30

PART IV		31

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules.	31

Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary.	32

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Business of the Company

Through our emergence from bankruptcy on September 30, 2021, and new investors and management, we are a holding company located in Palo Alto, California, with two subsidiaries: Mega Metaverse Corp., a California corporation (“Mega”) and JetFleet Holding Corp., a California corporation (“JHC”). On January 1, 2022, JetFleet Management Corp. (“JMC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of JHC, was merged with and into JHC, with JHC being the surviving entity. As part of the merger, JHC changed its name to JetFleet Management Corp. We intend to focus on the emerging GameFi sector through Mega which was recently formed in October 2021. To a lesser extent, we will also continue to focus on third-party management service contracts for aircraft operations through our majority owned subsidiary JHC, which was part of our legacy business.

Through Mega, we intend to focus on the GameFi sector through our first NFT (non-fungible token) game “Mano,” which was released on March 25, 2022. Mano is a competitive idle role-playing game (RPG) deploying the concept of GameFi in the innovative combination of NFTs and DeFi (decentralized finance) based on blockchain technology, with a “Play-to-Earn” business model in which players may earn financial rewards while they play in Mega’s metaverse universe “alSpace.”

Our mission is to enable users to play and earn financial rewards in the metaverse through GameFi. While our proposed future games will be supported in our alSpace universe, Mega’s key plans going forward include: (i) NFT games with Mano as our first game, as well as other games to launch; and (ii) a marketplace where players and users can place their in-game NFT to sell or to trade for other digital assets. Mega’s proposed revenue model includes: (a) service fees for in-game NFT upgrade and new NFT creation, and (b) profit share for NFT sold or traded at alSpace marketplace. Mega will conduct all of its operations from our Palo Alto office in California, United States.

In addition, through our 74.83% ownership in JHC as of December 31, 2021, we will continue to focus on third-party management service contracts for aircraft operations. We believe that as passive investor interest in aircraft assets has increased, there has been increasing demand from aircraft investors for professional third-party aircraft leasing and portfolio management. We intend to take advantage of our reputation, experience and expertise in this aircraft management area. JHC conducts all of its operations from its office located at 1818 Gilbreth Rd., Suite 243, Burlingame, California, United States.

We were also engaged in the business of investing in used regional aircraft equipment and leasing the equipment to foreign and domestic regional air carriers. Previously, we also provided leasing and finance services to regional airlines worldwide. In addition to leasing activities, we also sold aircraft from our operating lease portfolio to third parties. During 2019, we were in default of a credit facility with one of our lenders due to the failure of our largest customer, a European regional carrier. During 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic further impeded our ability to regain compliance with this lender and, in addition, led to significant cash flow issues for many of our customers who were unable to timely meet their obligations under their lease obligations. As a result of lessors being unable to pay their lease payment, this, in turn, adversely affect our ability to make payment under our debt obligation leading us to seek bankruptcy protection on March 29, 2021. We no longer own any aircraft, but JHC holds a finance lease receivable that is secured by an aircraft.

Bankruptcy

We and our subsidiaries, JHC and JMC, (collectively “Debtors”), filed on March 29, 2021 a voluntary petition for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The filing was made in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) Case No. 21-10636 (the “Chapter 11 Case”). We also filed motions with the Bankruptcy Court seeking authorization to continue to operate our business as “debtor-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court.

On August 16, 2021, in the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors filed unexecuted drafts of its Plan Sponsor Agreement to be entered into between us, Yucheng Hu, TongTong Ma, Qiang Zhang, Yanhua Li, Yiyi Huang, Hao Yang, Jing Li, Yeh Ching and Yu Wang, and identifying such individuals, collectively, as “Plan Sponsors” (the “Plan Sponsor Agreement”), and related agreements and documents required thereunder (collectively, with the Plan Sponsor Agreement, the “Plan Sponsor Documents”). The Plan Sponsor Documents were intended to cover the transactions contemplated by an investment term sheet entered into with Yucheng Hu and are part of the Debtors’ plan of reorganization as reflected in the Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan filed with the Bankruptcy Court as amended and supplemented from time to time (the “Plan”). On August 31, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order, Docket No. 0296 (the “Confirmation Order”), confirming the Plan as set forth in the Combined Plan Statement and Plan Supplement.

On September 30, 2021 and pursuant to the Plan Sponsor Agreement, we entered into and consummated the transactions contemplated by a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Plan Sponsor, and Yucheng Hu, in the capacity as the representative for the Plan Sponsor thereunder, pursuant to which we issued and sold, and the Plan Sponsor purchased, 2,870,927 (14,354,635 post-split) shares of our common stock at $3.85 for each share of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $11,053,069.

Also on September 30, 2021 and pursuant to the Plan Sponsor Agreement, we entered into and consummated the transactions contemplated by a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “JHC Series A Agreement”) with JHC, pursuant to which JHC issued and sold, and we purchased, 104,082 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, no par value, at $19.2156 per share of JHC Series A Preferred Stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $2 million.

The JHC Series A Preferred Stock is non-convertible, non-transferable, and has the following rights:

Divided Rights. The JHC Series A Preferred Stock, in preference to the Common Stock of JHC (“JHC Common Stock”), shall be entitled to receive quarterly dividends at a rate of 7.50% (the “Dividend Rate”) of the Series A Original Issue Price per annum per share of JHC Series A Preferred Stock commencing in the first fiscal quarter following the first fiscal year for which JHC reports a positive Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) for the preceding 12 month period (the “Initial Profitable Year”).

Liquidation Preference. In the event of a liquidation event, the holders of JHC Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, prior and in preference to any distribution of the proceeds of such liquidation event (the “Proceeds”) to the holders of the other series of preferred stock or the JHC Common Stock, an amount per share equal to the Series A Original Issue Price, plus declared but unpaid dividends on such share. The JHC Series A Preferred Stock has the following features:

Redemption. JHC shall have the right to ratably redeem, in whole or in parts, any shares of JHC Series A Preferred Stock at the Redemption Price (as defined below) upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to the holders of JHC Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, at any time following seven (7) years after the date that JHC first issues any shares of JHC Series A Preferred Stock, and within thirty (30) days upon a written request from the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of JHC Series A Preferred Stock, all outstanding shares of JHC Series A Preferred Stock shall be redeemed (the date of such redemption, the “Redemption Date”) by JHC by the payment from any source of funds legally available at the Redemption Price (defined below). The redemption price per share of Series A Preferred Stock (“Redemption Price”) shall be equal to:

(i) if redeemed prior to an Initial Profitable Year: (A) the Series A Original Issue Price, plus (B) any declared but unpaid dividends, plus (C) an amount per quarter equal to the Series A Original Issue Price multiplied by the Dividend Rate and divided by four for any full quarterly period for which dividends were not declared that falls within the period beginning on the date such share was issued by JHC and ending on the Redemption Date; or

(ii) if redeemed after an Initial Profitable Year: (A) the Series A Original Issue Price, plus (B) any declared but unpaid dividends, plus (C) an amount per quarter equal to the Series A Original Issue Price multiplied by the Dividend Rate and divided by four for any full quarterly period after the Initial Profitable Year for which dividends were not declared that falls within the period beginning on the date such shares was issued by JHC and ending on the Redemption Date.

In addition, each share of JHC Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to one (1) vote on any matter that is submitted to a vote or for the consent of the shareholders of JHC. The JHC Series A Preferred Stock provides the Company with 74.83% voting control over JHC immediately following its issuance.

On March 18, 2022, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, amending Article I and changing our name from AeroCentury Corp. to Mega Matrix Corp., with an effective date of March 25, 2022 (the “Name Change”). In connection with the Name Change, we changed our ticker symbol from “ACY” to “MTMT” on the NYSE American, which became effective on March 28, 2022.

Change In Control

As a condition to the closing of the Securities Purchase Agreement and effective as of September 30, 2021, Michael G. Magnusson resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer; Harold M. Lyons resigned as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Senior Vice President, Finance and Secretary; and Michael G. Magnusson, Toni M. Perazzo, Roy E. Hahn, Evan M. Wallach and David P. Wilson resigned as directors of the Company effective October 1, 2021.

Effective as of October 1, 2021, Yucheng Hu, Florence Ng, Jianan Jiang, Qin Yao and Siyuan Zhu (the “Incoming Directors”) were appointed to serve as members on our Board of Directors. The Incoming Directors were designated by the Plan Sponsor pursuant to the Plan Sponsor Agreement to hold office until our next annual meeting. The Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Hu to serve as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Ms. Ng to serve as Vice President of Operations; and Qin (Carol) Wang to serve as its Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer the Company.

Government Regulation

Related to our GameFi Business

Government regulation of blockchain and digital assets is being actively considered by the United States federal government via a number of agencies and regulatory bodies, as well as similar entities in other countries. State government regulations also may apply to our activities and other activities in which we participate or may participate in the future. Other regulatory bodies are governmental or semi-governmental and have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in the blockchain or cryptocurrency business.

Digital assets are assets issued and transferred using distributed ledger or blockchain technology. They are often referred to as crypto assets, cryptocurrency, or digital tokens, among other terminology. Digital assets can be securities, currencies, properties, or commodities, and depending on their characteristics, participants of digital assets must adhere to applicable laws and regulations. For example, the SEC treats some digital assets as “securities,” the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) treats some digital assets as “commodities,” and the Internal Revenue Service treats some digital assets as “property.” State regulators oversee digital assets through state money transfer laws, and the Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) monitors digital assets for anti-money laundering purposes.

Businesses that are engaged in the transmission and custody of digital assets that is not a security (“non-security digital assets”) such as Bitcoin, including brokers and custodians, can be subject to U.S. Treasury Department regulations as money services businesses as well as state money transmitter licensing requirements. Non-security digital assets are subject to anti-fraud regulations under federal and state commodity laws, and digital asset derivative instruments are substantively regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Certain jurisdictions, including, among others, New York and a number of countries outside the United States, have developed regulatory requirements specifically for digital assets and companies that transact in them.

In addition, since transactions in non-security digital assets such as Bitcoin provide a reasonable degree of pseudo anonymity, they are susceptible to misuse for criminal activities, such as money laundering. This misuse, or the perception of such misuse (even if untrue), could lead to greater regulatory oversight of non-security digital asset platforms, and there is the possibility that law enforcement agencies could close such platforms or other related infrastructure with little or no notice and prevent users from accessing or retrieving non-security digital assets via such platforms or infrastructure. For example, in her January 2021 nomination hearing before the Senate Finance Committee, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen noted that cryptocurrencies have the potential to improve the efficiency of the financial system but that they can be used to finance terrorism, facilitate money laundering, and support malign activities that threaten U.S. national security interests and the integrity of the U.S. and international financial systems. Accordingly, Secretary Yellen expressed her view that federal regulators needed to look closely at how to encourage the use of cryptocurrencies for legitimate activities while curtailing their use for malign and illegal activities. Furthermore, in December 2020, FinCEN proposed a new set of rules for cryptocurrency-based exchanges aimed at reducing the use of cryptocurrencies for money laundering. These proposed rules would require filing reports with FinCEN regarding cryptocurrency transactions in excess of $10,000 and also impose record-keeping requirements for cryptocurrency transactions in excess of $3,000 involving users who manage their own private keys. In January 2021, the Biden Administration issued a memorandum freezing federal rulemaking, including these proposed FinCEN rules, to provide additional time for the Biden Administration to review the rulemaking that had been proposed by the Trump Administration. As a result, it remains unclear whether these proposed rules will take effect.

Digital assets that meet the definition of a “security” under the federal securities laws (“digital assets security”) are regulated by federal securities regulations such as the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the Investment Advisers act of 1940.

In addition, businesses that provides a trading platform or exchanges for digital assets that are deemed securities may be required to register with the SEC as a national securities exchange unless an exemption is available. However, if such platform offers trading in digital assets that are not securities, it may have to register as a money-transmission service (MTS) instead of a SEC-regulated national securities exchange. MTSs are money transfer or payment operations that are mainly subject to state regulations, rather than federal regulations but may have to register with FinCEN and face certain reporting requirements.

Currently the SEC has not provided interpretive guidance on whether a NFT is a security or not. Currently the definition of “security” under the Securities Act does not explicitly include digital assets or NFTs; however, in enforcement actions the SEC has argued offerings of digital assets are investment contracts under the definition of “securities.” If an NFT is deemed a security, then it would be subject to SEC rules and regulations, and the platform facilitating the sale and resale of the NFT may have to register with the SEC as a national securities exchange unless an exemption is available.

Regulations may substantially change in the future and it is presently not possible to know how regulations will apply to our businesses, or when they will be effective. As the regulatory and legal environment evolves, we may become subject to new laws, further regulation by the SEC and other agencies, which may affect Gamefi business and other activities. For instance, various bills have also been proposed in Congress related to our business that may be adopted and have an impact on us. For additional discussion regarding our belief about the potential risks existing and future regulation pose to our business, see the Section entitled “Risk Factors” herein.

Related to our Aircraft Management Service

JHC is subject to compliance with federal, state and local government regulations. As a company engaged in international trade, these regulations include the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and various export control, money laundering, and anti-terrorism laws and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Department of Treasury.

Intellectual Property

The protection of our technology and intellectual property is an important aspect of our business. We currently rely upon a combination of trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, nondisclosure contractual commitments, and other legal rights to establish and protect our intellectual property.

As of December 31, 2021, we held one (1) registered trademark and four (4) pending trademark applications in the United States. We will evaluate our development efforts to assess the existence and patentability of new intellectual property. To the extent that it is feasible, we will file new patent applications with respect to our technology and trademark applications with respect to our brands.

Additional Information

We are a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1997. Our headquarters are located at 3000 El Camino Real, Bldg. 4, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA. Our main telephone number is (650) 340-1888. Our website is located at: http://www.mtmtgroup.com.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

An investment in our common stock involves risks. Prior to making a decision about investing in our common stock, you should consider carefully the risks together with all of the other information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and in our subsequent filings with the SEC. Each of the referenced risks and uncertainties could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition, as well as adversely affect the value of an investment in our securities. Additional risks not known to us or that we believe are immaterial may also adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition and the value of an investment in our securities.

Risks Related to our Business

The GameFi industry is new and developing and there is no assurance that our games currently under development will be accepted by players.

The development of the GameFi industry is new and continues to rapidly evolve. We intend to develop games with a “Play-to-Earn” model that allows players to earn financial rewards through NFT while they play in Mega’s metaverse universe “alSpace”. Our first NFT game was released on March 25, 2022. However, no assurance can be made that Mano will generate enough interest in order for players to use, trade, and sell their Mano NFTs.

The creation of NFTs for our games is dependent on our ability to develop an acceptable blockchain.

Our ability to create NFTs that can be minted, accepted and transferred is dependent on our ability to develop or engage a third party to develop an accepted and secured blockchain. Failure to develop or engage a third party to develop a secured and reliable blockchain, will adversely affect our ability to create a marketplace where players and users trade and sell their NFTs.

Our alSpace universe is still currently under development and no assurance can be given that our alSpace platform will be accepted by others or generate sufficient interest.

Our alSpace metaverse platform is still currently being developed and undergoing upgrades. It is our intent that the alSpace universe will (i) support our NFT games to launch; (ii) provide an engine and studio where creators can create their own game and use alSpace; and (iii) create a marketplace where players and users place their in-game NFT other NFT to sell and trade. Failure to develop a robust alSpace metaverse universe will adversely affect our business objectives.

Our business will be intensely competitive. We may not deliver successful and engaging games, or players and consumers may prefer our competitors’ products over our own.

Although the development of the GameFi industry is new, we anticipate that competition in our business will be intense. Many new products will be introduced, but we anticipate that only a relatively small number of products will drive significant engagement and account for a significant portion of total revenue. It is anticipated that our competitors will range from mature well-funded companies to emerging start-ups. If we do not develop consistent high-quality, well-received and engaging products that are of interest to players, the lack of interest will adversely affect our business objectives.

There can be no assurance that the market for NFTs will be developed and/or sustained, which may materially adversely affect the value of NFTs.

The market for digital assets, including, without limitation, NFTs, whether related to in-game assets or otherwise, is still nascent. Accordingly, the market for NFTs may not develop, or if a market does develop, such value be maintained. If a market does not develop for the NFTs, it may be difficult or impossible for us to maintain a marketplace where players and users can trade and eventually sell their NFTs. Failure to develop a marketplace for our NFTs will adversely affect our business objectives.

Our business will suffer to some extent if we are unable to continue to develop successful games for alSpace, successfully monetize alSpace games, or successfully forecast alSpace launches and/or monetization.

Our business depends in part on developing and publishing alSpace games including Mano for live online players for earning NFTs, and that such consumers will download and spend time playing. We have devoted and we expect to continue to devote substantial resources to development, analytics and marketing of our alSpace games, however we cannot guarantee that we will continue to develop games that appeal to players. The success of our games depend, in part, on unpredictable and volatile factors beyond our control including consumer preferences, competing games, new metaverse platforms and the availability of other entertainment experiences. If our games are not launched on time or do not meet consumer expectations, or if they are not brought to market in a timely and effective manner, our ability to grow revenue and our financial performance will be negatively affected.

In addition to the market factors noted above, our ability to successfully develop games for alSpace and our ability to achieve commercial success will depend on our ability to:

●

effectively market the alSpace games to existing gamers and new gamers without excess costs;

●

effectively monetize the games;

●

adapt to changing player preferences;

●

expand and enhance the alSpace games after their initial releases;

●

attract, retain and motivate talented game designers, product managers and engineers who have experience developing games for metaverse platforms;

●

minimize launch delays and cost overruns on the development of our alSpace games;

●

maintain quality alSpace game experience;

●

compete successfully against a large and growing number of existing market participants;

●

minimize and quickly resolve bugs or outages; and

●

acquire and successfully integrate high quality metaverse assets, personnel or companies.

These and other uncertainties make it difficult to know whether we will succeed in continuing to develop successful alSpace games and launch these games in accordance with our financial plan. If we do not succeed in doing so, our business model for this particular part will suffer.

We have a relatively new history in developing and launching metaverse games. As a result, we may have difficulty predicting the development schedule of our new games and forecasting bookings for a game. If launches are delayed and we are unable to monetize the alSpace game in the manner that we forecast, our ability to grow revenue and our financial performance will be negatively impacted.

One primary strategy to grow our business is to develop NFTs and games for alSpace. If we are not able to attract players to our GameFi platform, our financial position and operating results may suffer.

The technology underlying blockchain technology is subject to a number of industry-wide challenges and risks relating to consumer acceptance of blockchain technology. The slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of blockchain networks and blockchain assets would have a material adverse effect on the successful adoption of the NFTs.

The growth of the blockchain industry is subject to a high degree of uncertainty regarding consumer adoption and long-term development. The factors affecting the further development of the blockchain and NFT industry include, without limitation:

●

worldwide growth in the adoption and use of NFTs and other blockchain technologies;

●

government and quasi-government regulation of NFTs and their use, or restrictions on or regulation of access to and operation of blockchain networks or similar systems;

●

the maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of blockchain networks;

●

changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences;

●

the availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services, or trading assets, including new means of using government-backed currencies or existing networks;

●

the extent to which current interest in NFTs represents a speculative “bubble”;

●

general economic conditions in the United States and the world;

●

the regulatory environment relating to NFTs and blockchains; and

●

a decline in the popularity or acceptance of NFTs or other digital assets.

The NFT industry as a whole has been characterized by rapid changes and innovations and is constantly evolving. Although it has experienced significant growth in recent years, the slowing or stopping of the development, general acceptance and adoption and usage of blockchain networks and blockchain assets may deter or delay the acceptance and adoption of NFTs.

The slowing or stopping of the development, general acceptance and adoption and usage of blockchain networks or blockchain assets may adversely impact the value of NFTs. The value of specific NFTs relies on the development, general acceptance and adoption and usage of the applicable blockchain network which depends on ability to readily access the applicable network.

The prices of digital assets are extremely volatile, and such volatility may have a material adverse effect on the value of alSpace NFTs.

Decreases in the price of even a single other digital asset may cause volatility in the entire digital asset industry and may affect the value of other digital assets, including any alSpace NFTs. For example, a security breach or any other incident or set of circumstances that affects purchaser or user confidence in a well-known digital asset may affect the industry as a whole and may also cause the price of other digital assets, including NFTs, to fluctuate.

The value of in-game asset NFTs relies in part on the development, general acceptance and adoption and usage of blockchain assets, rather than solely on the in-game asset itself.

In-game asset NFTs are a means to establish proof of ownership of in-game assets through cryptographic key pairs, the public key of the creator(s) who created the in-game asset and the private key of the holder representing a verified instance (whether unique or part of a series) of that in-game asset. The purchase of an in-game asset NFT gives the holder the right to hold, transfer and/or sell the NFT. The NFT does not itself include any physical manifestation of the in-game asset. The value of in-game asset NFTs is derived from the cryptographic record of ownership, rather than solely on the in-game asset itself (alBots and other in-game items); an in-game asset originated as an NFT (i.e., the actual file or files constituting the in-game asset of which ownership is represented by an NFT) may have no value absent the NFT, depending on what other rights were conveyed with the NFT, for example a copyright interest that could be transferred separate from the NFT. Thus, the value of the in-game asset NFT relies in part on the continued development, acceptance, adoption and usage of the applicable blockchain.

Expansion of our operations into new products, services and technologies, including content categories, is inherently risky and may subject us to additional business, legal, financial and competitive risks.

Historically, our operations have been focused on third-party management service contracts for aircraft operations. Further expansion of our operations and our marketplace into additional products and services, such as NFTs involves numerous risks and challenges, including potential new competition, increased capital requirements and increased marketing spent to achieve customer awareness of these new products and services. Growth into additional content, product and service areas may require changes to our existing business model and cost structure and modifications to our infrastructure and may expose us to new regulatory and legal risks, any of which may require expertise in areas in which we have little or no experience. There is no guarantee that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue from sales of such products and services to offset the costs of developing, acquiring, managing and monetizing such products and services and our business may be adversely affected.

If we cannot continue to innovate technologically or develop, market and sell new products and services, or enhance existing technology and products and services to meet customer requirements, our ability to grow our revenue could be impaired.

Our growth largely depends on our ability to innovate and add value to our existing creative platform and to provide our customers and contributors with a scalable, high-performing technology infrastructure that can efficiently and reliably handle increased customer and contributor usage globally, as well as the deployment of new features. For example, NFTs require additional capital and resources. Without improvements to our technology and infrastructure, our operations might suffer from unanticipated system disruptions, slow performance or unreliable service levels, any of which could negatively affect our reputation and ability to attract and retain customers and contributors. We are currently making, and plan to continue making, significant investments to maintain and enhance the technology and infrastructure and to evolve our information processes and computer systems in order to run our business more efficiently and remain competitive. We may not achieve the anticipated benefits, significant growth or increased market share from these investments for several years, if at all. If we are unable to manage our investments successfully or in a cost-efficient manner, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

The value of NFT is uncertain and may subject us to unforeseeable risks.

We create and support NFTs. NFTs are unique, one-of-a-kind digital assets made possible by certain digital asset network protocols. Because of their non-fungible nature, NFTs introduce digital scarcity and have become popular as online “collectibles,” similar to physical rare collectible items, such as trading cards or art. Like real world collectibles, the value of NFTs may be prone to “boom and bust” cycles as popularity increases and subsequently subsides. If any of these bust cycles were to occur, it could adversely affect the value of certain of our future strategies. In addition, because NFTs generally rely on the same types of underlying technologies as digital assets, most risks applicable to digital assets are also applicable to NFTs and hence our creation of NFTs will be subject to general digital assets risks as described elsewhere in these risk factors.

A particular digital asset’s status as a “security” in any relevant jurisdiction is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and depending upon the activities undertaken by our customers utilizing our products and services, we and our customers may be subject to regulatory scrutiny, investigations, fines, and other penalties, which may adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.

The SEC and its staff have taken the position that certain digital assets fall within the definition of a “security” under the U.S. federal securities laws. The legal test for determining whether any given digital asset is a security is a highly complex, fact-driven analysis that evolves over time, and the outcome is difficult to predict. The SEC generally does not provide advance guidance or confirmation on the status of any particular asset as a security. Furthermore, the SEC’s views in this area have evolved over time and it is difficult to predict the direction or timing of any continuing evolution. With respect to various digital assets, there is currently no certainty under the applicable legal test that such assets are not securities, notwithstanding the conclusions we may draw based on our risk-based assessment regarding the likelihood that a particular asset could be deemed a “security” under applicable laws.

The classification of a digital asset as a security under applicable law has wide-ranging implications for the regulatory obligations that flow from the offer, sale and trading of such assets. For example, a digital asset that is a security in the United States may generally only be offered or sold in the United States pursuant to a registration statement filed with the SEC or in an offering that qualifies for an exemption from registration. Persons that effect transactions in assets that are securities in the United States may be subject to registration with the SEC as a “broker” or “dealer.” Platforms that bring together purchasers and sellers to trade digital assets that are securities in the United States are generally subject to registration as national securities exchanges, or must qualify for an exemption, such as by being operated by a registered broker-dealer as an alternative trading system, or ATS, in compliance with rules for ATSs. Persons facilitating clearing and settlement of securities may be subject to registration with the SEC as a clearing agency. Foreign jurisdictions may have similar licensing, registration, and qualification requirements.

If the SEC, foreign regulatory authority, or a court were to determine that a supported digital asset offered, sold, or traded by one of our customers on a platform provided by us is a security, our customer would not be able to offer such asset for trading until it was able to do so in a compliant manner, which would require significant expenditures by the customer. In addition, we or our customer could be subject to judicial or administrative sanctions for failing to offer or sell the digital asset in compliance with the registration requirements, or for acting as a broker, dealer, or national securities exchange without appropriate registration. Such an action could result in injunctions, cease and desist orders, as well as civil monetary penalties, fines, disgorgement, criminal liability, and reputational harm which could negatively impact our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Risks Related to our Company

Our filing of bankruptcy may adversely affect our business and relationships.

On August 31, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court entered its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Approving and Confirming the Combined Disclosure Statement and Joint Chapter 11 Plan of AeroCentury Corp., and its Affiliated Debtors. The Effective Date of the Plan occurred on September 30, 2021. Each condition precedent to consummation of the Plan has been satisfied and/or waived.

As a result of our bankruptcy filing:

●

suppliers, vendors or other contract counterparties may require additional financial assurances or enhanced performance from us;

●

our ability to compete for new business may be adversely affected;

●

our ability to attract, motivate and retain key executives and employees may be adversely affected;

●

our employees may be distracted from performance of their duties or more easily attracted to other employment opportunities; and

●

we may have difficulty obtaining the capital we need to operate and grow our business.

The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.

Upon our emergence from Chapter 11, the composition of our stockholder base has changed significantly.

As a result of the concentration of our equity ownership, our future strategy and plans may differ materially from those in the past. Upon our emergence from Chapter 11, the Plan Sponsors collectively held approximately 65.0% of our common stock, while holders of our legacy equity interests held approximately 35.0% of our common stock. Therefore, the Plan Sponsors have significant control on the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including, but not limited to, electing directors and approving corporate transactions. As a result, our future strategy and plans may differ materially from those of the past. Circumstances may occur in which the interests of the Plan Sponsors could be in conflict with the interests of other stockholders, and the Plan Sponsors would have substantial influence to cause us to take actions that align with their interests. Should conflicts arise, there can be no assurance that the Plan Sponsors would act in the best interests of other stockholders or that any conflicts of interest would be resolved in a manner favorable to our other stockholders.

The composition of our board of directors has changed significantly.

Pursuant to the Plan, the composition of our board of directors changed significantly. Upon our emergence from Chapter 11, our board of directors consisted of five directors, none of whom had previously served on our board of directors. The new directors have different backgrounds, experiences and perspectives from those who previously served on our board of directors and thus may have different views on the issues that will determine our future. There can be no assurance that our new board of directors will pursue, or will pursue in the same manner, our previous strategy and business plans.

Certain information contained in our historical financial statements are not comparable to the information contained in our financial statements after the adoption of fresh start accounting.

Upon our emergence from Chapter 11, we adopted fresh start accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 852 and became a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result, we revalued our assets and liabilities based on our estimate of our enterprise value and the fair value of each of our assets and liabilities. These estimates, projections and enterprise valuation were prepared solely for the purpose of the bankruptcy proceedings and should not be relied upon by investors for any other purpose. At the time they were prepared, the determination of these values reflected numerous estimates and assumptions, and the fair values recorded based on these estimates may not be fully realized in periods subsequent to our emergence from Chapter 11.

The consolidated financial statements after our emergence from bankruptcy will not be comparable to the consolidated financial statements on or before that date. This will make it difficult for stockholders to assess our performance in relation to prior periods.

We have a limited operating history in our post-bankruptcy new focus business, so there is a limited track record on which to judge our business prospects and management.

We have limited operating history in GameFi, NFT and metaverse upon which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects. You must consider the risks and difficulties we face as a small operating company with limited operating history. Further, our additional game development for metaverse games is a new venture, to which we have no experience and will rely upon our third party developers to develop such a game.

We may need to raise additional capital by issuing additional securities which could hurt the market for our securities or be on terms more favorable than those of our current shareholders.

We will need to, or desire to, raise substantial additional capital in the future if this funding is not fully carried out. Our future capital requirements will depend on the costs of establishing or acquiring sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities for our services inducing sales of AlBots, the gaming portion of the company, and operations and other potential unforeseen circumstances.

Our business depends on the continuing efforts of our management. If it loses their services, our business may be severely disrupted.

Our business operations depend on the efforts of our new management, particularly the executive officers named in this document. If one or more of our management were unable or unwilling to continue their employment with us, it might not be able to replace them in a timely manner, or at all. We may incur additional expenses to recruit and retain qualified replacements. Our business may be severely disrupted, and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, our management may join a competitor or form a competing company. As a result, our business may be negatively affected due to the loss of one or more members of our management.

We may not be able to prevent or timely detect cyber security breaches and may be subject to data, security and/or system breaches which could adversely affect our business operations and financial conditions.

We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the use of third-party communications systems over the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support our business activities. These information technology networks and systems may be subject to security breaches, hacking, phishing, or spoofing attempts by others to gain unauthorized access to our business information and financial accounts. A cyberattack, unauthorized intrusion, or theft of personal, financial or sensitive business information could have a material adverse effect of on our business operations or our clients’ information, and could harm our operations, reputation and financial situation. In addition, due to an increase in the types of cyberattacks, our employees could be victim to such scams designed to trick victims into transferring sensitive company data or funds, that could compromise and/or disrupt our business operations.

We were a victim of a business email compromise scam (BEC) in December 2021. BEC scams involve using social engineering to cause employees to wire funds to the perpetrators in the mistaken belief that the requests were made by a company executive or established vendor. As a result of the BEC scam, we have enhanced BEC awareness within our organization, established additional controls to help detect BEC scams when they occur, and require additional confirmations for large money transactions. In addition, we seek to detect and investigate all cybersecurity incidents and to prevent their recurrence, but in some cases, we might be unaware of an incident or its magnitude, duration, and effects. While we take every effort to train our employees to be cognizant of these types of attacks and to take appropriate precautions, and have taken actions and implemented controls to protect our systems and information, the level of technological sophistication being used by attackers has increased in recent years, and may be insufficient to protect our systems or information. Any successful cyberattack against us could lead to the loss of significant company funds or result in in potential liability, including litigation or other legal actions against us, or the imposition of penalties, which could cause us to incur significant remedial costs. Further, we cannot ensure that our efforts and measures taken will be sufficient to prevent or mitigate any damage caused by a cybersecurity incident, and our networks and systems may be vulnerable to security breaches, hacking, phishing, spoofing, BEC, employee error or manipulation, or other adverse events.

Due to the evolving nature and increased sophistication of these cybersecurity threats, the potential impact of any future incident cannot be predicted with certainty; however, any such incidents could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition, especially if we fail to maintain sufficient insurance coverage to cover liabilities incurred or are unable to recover any funds lost in data, security and/or system breaches, and could result in a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective, and if we continue to fail to improve such controls and procedures, investors could lose confidence in our financial and other reports, the price of our common stock may decline, and we may be subject to increased risks and liabilities.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual reports with respect to our business and financial condition. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we include a report of our management on our internal control over financial reporting. We are also required to include certifications of our management regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. We previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting relating to our tax review control for complex transactions. We are in the process of enhancing our tax review control related to unusual transactions that we may encounter, but that control has not operated for a sufficient time to determine if the control was effective as of December 31, 2021. If we cannot effectively maintain our controls and procedures, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and other information we report which would likely cause investors to lose confidence. This lack of confidence could lead to a decline in the trading price of our common stock.

Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require substantial financial and management resources and may increase the time and costs of completing an acquisition.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls and may require us to have such system audited by an independent registered public accounting firm. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties and/or shareholder litigation. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports could harm our business. Furthermore, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in the implementation of adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our securities.

The trading prices of our common stock could be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to our shareholders and investors.

The trading prices of our common stock could be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, like the performance and fluctuation in the market prices or the underperformance or deteriorating financial results of other similarly situated companies that have listed their securities in the U.S. in recent years. The securities of some of these companies have experienced significant volatility including, in some cases, substantial price declines in the trading prices of their securities. In addition, securities markets may from time to time experience significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to our operating performance, such as the large decline in share prices in the United States and other jurisdictions.

In addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading volume for our common stock may be highly volatile for factors specific to our own operations including the following:

●

variations in our revenues, earnings and cash flow;

●

market conditions in the GameFi and NFT services sectors or the economy as a whole;

●

announcements of new product and service offerings, investments, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, or capital commitments by us or our competitors;

●

changes in the performance or market valuation of our company or our competitors;

●

changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;

●

changes in the number of our users and customers;

●

fluctuations in our operating metrics;

●

failures on our part to realize monetization opportunities as expected;

●

additions or departures of our key management and personnel;

●

detrimental negative publicity about us, our competitors or our industry;

●

market conditions or regulatory developments affecting us or our industry; and

●

potential litigations or regulatory investigations.

Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the trading volume and the price at which our common stock will trade. In the past, shareholders of a public company often brought securities class action suits against the listed company following periods of instability in the market price of that company’s securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations, which could harm our results of operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If our common stock becomes subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules, broker-dealers may experience difficulty in completing customer transactions, and trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected.

If at any time we have net tangible assets of $5,000,001 or less and our common stock has a market price per share of less than $5.00, transactions in our common stock may be subject to the “penny stock” rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. Under these rules, broker-dealers who recommend such securities to persons other than institutional accredited investors must:

●

make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser;

●

receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to sale;

●

provide the purchaser with risk disclosure documents which identify certain risks associated with investing in “penny stocks” and which describe the market for these “penny stocks” as well as a purchaser’s legal remedies; and