Compare · PCG vs XEL
PCG vs XEL
Side-by-side comparison of Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PCG) and Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both PCG and XEL operate in Power Generation (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- XEL is the larger of the two at $49.34B, about 1.1x PCG ($45.85B).
- PCG has been more active in the news (19 items in the past 4 weeks vs 14 for XEL).
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
PG&E Corporation, through its subsidiary, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, engages in the sale and delivery of electricity and natural gas to customers in northern and central California, the United States. It generates electricity using nuclear, hydroelectric, fossil fuel-fired, fuel cell, and photovoltaic sources. As of December 31, 2020, the company owns and operates approximately 18,000 circuit miles of interconnected transmission lines, 35 electric transmission substations, approximately 108,000 circuit miles of distribution lines, 68 transmission switching substations, and 758 distribution substations; and natural gas transmission, storage, and distribution system consisting of approximately 43,500 miles of distribution pipelines, approximately 6,300 miles of backbone and local transmission pipelines, and various storage facilities. It serves residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural customers, as well as natural gas-fired electric generation facilities. The company was founded in 1905 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
Xcel Energy Inc.
Xcel Energy Inc., through its subsidiaries, generates, purchases, transmits, distributes, and sells electricity. It operates through Regulated Electric Utility, Regulated Natural Gas Utility, and All Other segments. The company generates electricity through coal, nuclear, natural gas, hydroelectric, solar, biomass, oil, wood/refuse, and wind energy sources. It also purchases, transports, distributes, and sells natural gas to retail customers, as well as transports customer-owned natural gas. In addition, the company develops and leases natural gas pipelines, and storage and compression facilities; and invests in rental housing projects, as well as procures equipment for the construction of renewable generation facilities. It serves residential, commercial, and industrial customers in the portions of Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin. The company sells electricity to approximately 3.7 million customers; and natural gas to approximately 2.1 million customers. Xcel Energy Inc. was incorporated in 1909 and is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Latest PCG
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
- Director Cooper Kerry Whorton sold $20,625 worth of shares (1,250 units at $16.50) as part of a pre-agreed trading plan, decreasing direct ownership by 1% to 89,603 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 4 filed by EVP, Chief People Officer Vallejo Alejandro T
- The PG&E Corporation Foundation to Award $500,000 in Community-Focused Grants for Environmental Stewardship
- Director Cooper Kerry Whorton was granted 17,639 shares, increasing direct ownership by 24% to 90,853 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Cannizzaro Edward G was granted 10,948 shares, increasing direct ownership by 35% to 42,427 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bahri Rajat was granted 10,948 shares, increasing direct ownership by 15% to 83,169 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Campbell Cheryl F. was granted 10,948 shares, increasing direct ownership by 15% to 85,596 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Denecour Jessica was granted 10,948 shares, increasing direct ownership by 15% to 81,715 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Wilson Benjamin Francis was granted 10,948 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 80,599 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest XEL
- Xcel Energy Powering Communities, Economies as Energy Landscape Evolves
- PowerOn Midwest Economic Impact Report Highlights Billions in Benefits for Minnesota
- Xcel Energy Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
- Director Welsh Timothy A was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 15% to 17,018 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kampling Patricia L was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 24,551 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Pardee Charles G was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 33,311 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Stockfish Devin W was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 41% to 7,798 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Johnson Netha N. was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 19,340 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hutchinson Maria Demaree was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 230% to 3,234 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Casey Lynn was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 43,123 units (SEC Form 4)