Compare · EOG vs SM
EOG vs SM
Side-by-side comparison of EOG Resources Inc. (EOG) and SM Energy Company (SM): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both EOG and SM operate in Oil & Gas Production (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- EOG is the larger of the two at $73.39B, about 9.5x SM ($7.72B).
- Over the past year, EOG is up 20.5% and SM is up 25.9% - SM leads by 5.3 points.
- EOG has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 7 for SM).
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
EOG Resources Inc.
EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, and natural gas and natural gas liquids. Its principal producing areas are in New Mexico and Texas in the United States; the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; the People's Republic of China; and the Sultanate of Oman. As of December 31, 2020, it had total estimated net proved reserves of 3,220 million barrels of oil equivalent, including 1,514 million barrels (MMBbl) of crude oil and condensate reserves; 813 MMBbl of natural gas liquid reserves; and 5,360 billion cubic feet of natural gas reserves. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company. EOG Resources, Inc. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
SM Energy Company
SM Energy Company, an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the state of Texas. As of December 31, 2020, it had 404.6 million barrels of oil equivalent of estimated proved reserves; and working interests in 801 gross productive oil wells and 498 gross productive gas wells in the Midland Basin and South Texas. The company was formerly known as St. Mary Land & Exploration Company and changed its name to SM Energy Company in May 2010. SM Energy Company was founded in 1908 and is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
Latest EOG
- EOG Resources to Present at Upcoming Conference
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.16% to 34,752 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kerr Michael T. was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.25% to 22,931 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dugle Lynn A was granted 57 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.75% to 7,654 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R sold $256,953 worth of shares (1,887 units at $136.17), decreasing direct ownership by 3% to 63,160 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chandler John D was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 187% to 2,367 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Daniels Robert P was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 34,695 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Clark Janet F was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 49,241 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crisp Charles R was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 65,047 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Robertson Julie J was granted 1,541 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 17,150 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest SM
- SM Energy to Participate in Upcoming Investor Conference
- SM Energy Company filed SEC Form 8-K: Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement
- SM Energy Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend
- SM Energy Company filed SEC Form 8-K: Leadership Update, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Director Peru Ramiro G sold $834,311 worth of shares (24,553 units at $33.98), decreasing direct ownership by 27% to 65,964 units (SEC Form 4)
- EnerCom Announces Premier Networking Events for the 31st Annual Energy Investment Conference, Including Monday Charity Golf Tournament, Monday VIP Welcome Mixer, and Tuesday Casino Night
- SM Energy upgraded by Raymond James with a new price target
- SM Energy upgraded by Siebert Williams Shank with a new price target
- SM Energy Company filed SEC Form 8-K: Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by SM Energy Company