Compare · BTU vs NC
BTU vs NC
Side-by-side comparison of Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and NACCO Industries Inc. (NC): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BTU and NC operate in Coal Mining (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- BTU is the larger of the two at $2.93B, about 11.5x NC ($253.7M).
- NC has been more active in the news (13 items in the past 4 weeks vs 2 for BTU).
- BTU has more recent analyst coverage (8 ratings vs 0 for NC).
Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation engages in coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, China, India, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company operates through Seaborne Thermal Mining, Seaborne Metallurgical Mining, Powder River Basin Mining, and Other U.S. Thermal Mining segments. It is involved in mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal primarily to electric utilities; mining bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits; and mining metallurgical coal, such as hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal injection coal. The company supplies coal primarily to electricity generators, industrial facilities, and steel manufacturers. As of December 31, 2020, it owned interests in 17 coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia; and had approximately 3.0 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 450,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The company also engages in direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts, as well as provides transportation-related services, which involve financial derivative contracts and physical contracts. Peabody Energy Corporation was founded in 1883 and is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
NACCO Industries Inc.
NACCO Industries, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the mining and natural resources businesses. The company operates through three segments: Coal Mining, North American Mining, and Minerals Management. The Coal Mining segment operates surface coal mines under long-term contracts with power generation companies, as well as with activated carbon producers in North Dakota, Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Navajo Nation. The North American Mining segment provides value-added contract mining and other services for producers of aggregates, lithium, and other minerals; and contract mining services for independently owned mines and quarries in Florida. The Minerals Management segment is involved in the leasing of its royalty and mineral interests to third-party exploration and production companies, and other mining companies, which grants them the rights to explore, develop, mine, produce, market, and sell gas, oil, and coal; and provision of surface and mineral acquisition, and lease maintenance services. NACCO Industries, Inc. was founded in 1913 and is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.
Latest BTU
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- SEC Form SD filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- Peabody Announces Full Redemption of 3.250% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
- Peabody Energy Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Director Champion William H was granted 101 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.23% to 43,304 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Malone Robert A was granted 52 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 58,692 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Walker Clayton D. was granted 23 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.29% to 7,927 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gorman Stephen E was granted 51 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 57,720 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hodges Georganne was granted 22 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.27% to 8,064 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chirekos Nicholas J. was granted 53 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.12% to 44,672 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest NC
- Director Burns Patrick Joseph (2026) was granted 310 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sachs Valerie Gentile was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 11,684 units (SEC Form 4)
- Member of a Group Rankin Victoire G was granted 663 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Group Member Rankin Alfred M Et Al was granted 663 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mcdonald William Paul was granted 663 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Shapard Robert S was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 4% to 19,413 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Miller Michael Sidney was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 28,984 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Labarre Dennis W was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 45,616 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dalrymple John S Iii was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 26,968 units (SEC Form 4)
- Non-Executive Chairman Jumper John P was granted 1,125 shares (SEC Form 4)