Compare · BHP vs NC
BHP vs NC
Side-by-side comparison of BHP Group Limited (BHP) and NACCO Industries Inc. (NC): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BHP and NC operate in Coal Mining (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- BHP is the larger of the two at $210.74B, about 830.6x NC ($253.7M).
- NC has been more active in the news (13 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for BHP).
- BHP has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for NC).
BHP Group Limited
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, rest of Asia, North America, South America, and internationally. It operates through Petroleum, Copper, Iron Ore, and Coal segments. The company engages in the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas properties; and mining of copper, silver, zinc, molybdenum, uranium, gold, iron ore, and metallurgical and energy coal. It is also involved in mining, smelting, and refining of nickel; the provision of towing, freight, marketing and trading, marketing support, finance, administrative, and other services; and potash development activities. The company was founded in 1851 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
NACCO Industries Inc.
NACCO Industries, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the mining and natural resources businesses. The company operates through three segments: Coal Mining, North American Mining, and Minerals Management. The Coal Mining segment operates surface coal mines under long-term contracts with power generation companies, as well as with activated carbon producers in North Dakota, Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Navajo Nation. The North American Mining segment provides value-added contract mining and other services for producers of aggregates, lithium, and other minerals; and contract mining services for independently owned mines and quarries in Florida. The Minerals Management segment is involved in the leasing of its royalty and mineral interests to third-party exploration and production companies, and other mining companies, which grants them the rights to explore, develop, mine, produce, market, and sell gas, oil, and coal; and provision of surface and mineral acquisition, and lease maintenance services. NACCO Industries, Inc. was founded in 1913 and is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.
Latest BHP
- Group Financial Controller Stone Emma Kate was granted 64 units of Ordinary Shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 4,780 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
- Group Financial Controller Stone Emma Kate converted options into 7,774 units of Ordinary Shares and sold $315,465 worth of Ordinary Shares (6,774 units at $46.57), increasing direct ownership by 27% to 4,716 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 20-F filed by BHP Group Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by BHP Group Limited
Latest NC
- Director Burns Patrick Joseph (2026) was granted 310 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sachs Valerie Gentile was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 11,684 units (SEC Form 4)
- Member of a Group Rankin Victoire G was granted 663 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Group Member Rankin Alfred M Et Al was granted 663 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mcdonald William Paul was granted 663 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Shapard Robert S was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 4% to 19,413 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Miller Michael Sidney was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 28,984 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Labarre Dennis W was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 1% to 45,616 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dalrymple John S Iii was granted 663 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 26,968 units (SEC Form 4)
- Non-Executive Chairman Jumper John P was granted 1,125 shares (SEC Form 4)