Compare · BEN vs MLCI
BEN vs MLCI
Side-by-side comparison of Franklin Resources Inc. (BEN) and Mount Logan Capital Inc. (MLCI): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BEN and MLCI operate in Investment Managers (Finance), so they compete in similar markets.
- BEN is the larger of the two at $15.94B, about 449.5x MLCI ($35.5M).
- BEN has been more active in the news (16 items in the past 4 weeks vs 2 for MLCI).
- BEN has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for MLCI).
BEN
Franklin Resources Inc.
Franklin Resources, Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company. Through its subsidiaries, the firm provides its services to individuals, institutions, pension plans, trusts, and partnerships. It launches equity, fixed income, balanced, and multi-asset mutual funds through its subsidiaries. The firm invests in the public equity, fixed income, and alternative markets. Franklin Resources, Inc. was founded in 1947 and is based in San Mateo, California with an additional office in Hyderabad, India.
Latest BEN
- SEC Form 4 filed by Franklin Resources Inc.
- SEC Form 4 filed by Franklin Resources Inc.
- SEC Form 4 filed by Franklin Resources Inc.
- SEC Form 4 filed by Franklin Resources Inc.
- SEC Form 4 filed by Franklin Resources Inc.
- SEC Form 4 filed by Franklin Resources Inc.
- SEC Form 4 filed by Franklin Resources Inc.
- Franklin Templeton and Benefit Street Partners Expand Asset-Backed Finance Capabilities with Encina Lender Finance Transaction
- UBS resumed coverage on Franklin Templeton with a new price target
- Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. Schedules Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call
Latest MLCI
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Mount Logan Capital Inc.
- Mount Logan Capital Inc. Completes Merger of the Alternative Credit Income Fund with BC Partners Lending Corporation
- Mount Logan Capital Inc. to Participate in the Lake Street Capital Markets 10th Annual Best Ideas Growth (BIG10) Conference
- Chief Financial Officer Satoren Brandon bought $3,240 worth of shares (1,000 units at $3.24), increasing direct ownership by 5% to 21,314 units (SEC Form 4)
- Amendment: Director Reinfrank Rudolph R was granted 57,554 shares, increasing direct ownership by 101% to 114,422 units (SEC Form 4)
- Amendment: Director Ratchford Buckley T. was granted 57,554 shares, increasing direct ownership by 182% to 89,171 units (SEC Form 4)
- Amendment: Director Allen David Brian was granted 57,554 shares, increasing direct ownership by 182% to 89,171 units (SEC Form 4)
- Amendment: Director Weil Parker Anders was granted 57,554 shares, increasing direct ownership by 921% to 63,805 units (SEC Form 4)
- Amendment: Director Liak Yuan Yi Sabrina was granted 57,554 shares, increasing direct ownership by 147% to 96,810 units (SEC Form 4)
- Amendment: Director Westwood Matthew Joseph was granted 57,554 shares (SEC Form 4)