Compare · LEVI vs MJID
LEVI vs MJID
Side-by-side comparison of Levi Strauss & Co (LEVI) and Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd (MJID): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both LEVI and MJID operate in Apparel (Consumer Discretionary), so they compete in similar markets.
- LEVI carries a market cap of $8.12B.
- LEVI has hit the wire 13 times in the past 4 weeks while MJID has been quiet.
- LEVI has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for MJID).
- Company
- Levi Strauss & Co
- Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd
- Price
- -
- -
- Market cap
- $8.12B
- -
- 1M return
- -16.35%
- -
- 1Y return
- -3.07%
- -
- Industry
- Apparel
- Apparel
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NASDAQ
- IPO
- 2019
- 2025
- News (4w)
- 13
- 0
- Recent ratings
- 25
- 0
Levi Strauss & Co
Levi Strauss & Co. operates as an apparel company. It designs, markets, and sells jeans, casual and dress pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear, and related accessories for men, women, and children in the Americas, Europe, and Asia. The company sells its products under the Levi's, Dockers, Signature by Levi Strauss & Co., and Denizen brands; and also licenses its Levi's and Dockers trademarks for various product categories, including footwear, belts, wallets and bags, outerwear, sweaters, dress shirts, kids wear, sleepwear, and hosiery. The company sells its products through third-party retailers, such as department stores, specialty retailers, third-party e-commerce sites, and franchisees who operate brand-dedicated stores; and directly to consumers through various formats, including company-operated mainline and outlet stores, company-operated e-commerce sites, and select shop-in-shops located in department stores and other third-party retail locations. It operates approximately 3,100 brand-dedicated stores and shop-in-shops. The company was founded in 1853 and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.
Latest LEVI
- Levi Strauss & Co filed SEC Form 8-K: Leadership Update
- Director Prime Joshua E was granted 106 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.14% to 73,422 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ming Jenny J was granted 54 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.07% to 73,087 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Marberger David S was granted 73 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.23% to 31,366 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Geballe Daniel W was granted 130 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.64% to 20,423 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Eckert Robert was granted 381 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.37% to 103,606 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Garten Yael was granted 156 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.23% to 69,253 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Beraud Jill was granted 54 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.03% to 181,261 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Patrick Artemis was granted 68 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.30% to 22,777 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Jones Jeffrey J Ii was granted 67 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.64% to 10,590 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest MJID
- SEC Form S-8 filed by Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd
- Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd Announces Approval of Name Change to "Ping An Biomedical Co., Ltd." at Extraordinary General Meeting
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Majestic Ideal Holdings Ltd