Compare · KEP vs VST
KEP vs VST
Side-by-side comparison of Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and Vistra Corp. (VST): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both KEP and VST operate in Electric Utilities: Central (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- VST is the larger of the two at $52.18B, about 3.2x KEP ($16.55B).
- VST has been more active in the news (12 items in the past 4 weeks vs 4 for KEP).
- VST has more recent analyst coverage (24 ratings vs 5 for KEP).
Korea Electric Power Corporation
Korea Electric Power Corporation, an integrated electric utility company, generates, transmits, and distributes electricity in South Korea and internationally. The company operates through Transmission and Distribution, Electric Power Generation (Nuclear), Electric Power Generation (Non-nuclear), Plant Maintenance & Engineering Service, and Others segments. It generates power from nuclear, coal, oil, liquefied natural gas, internal combustion, combined-cycle, integrated gasification combined cycle, hydro, wind, solar, fuel cell, biogas, and other sources. As of December 31, 2020, the company had a total of 697 generation units, including nuclear, thermal, hydroelectric, and internal combustion units with an installed generation capacity of 83,854 megawatts. Its transmission system consisted of 34,664 circuit kilometers of lines of 765 kilovolts and others, including high-voltage direct current lines, as well as 877 substations with an installed transformer capacity of 336,926 megavolt-amperes; and distribution system included 129,789 megavolt-amperes of transformer capacity and 9,787,967 units of support with a total line length of 514,779 circuit kilometers. The company provides electricity to residential, commercial, educational, industrial, agricultural, street lighting, and overnight power usage. It also offers fly ashes recycling, utility plant maintenance and engineering, resources development, electric power information technology, facility maintenance, electric meter reading, security, information, and communication line leasing services, as well as sells nuclear fuel. Korea Electric Power Corporation was founded in 1961 and is headquartered in Naju-si, South Korea.
Vistra Corp.
Vistra Corp., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the electricity business in the United States. It operates through six segments: Retail, Texas, East, West, Sunset, and Asset Closure. The company retails electricity and natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers across 20 states in the United States and the District of Columbia. It is also involved in the electricity generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management, fuel production, and fuel logistics management activities. The company serves approximately 4.5 million residential, commercial, and industrial customers. It has a generation capacity of approximately 38,700 megawatts with a portfolio of natural gas, nuclear, coal, solar, and battery energy storage facilities. The company was formerly known as Vistra Energy Corp. and changed its name to Vistra Corp. in July 2020. Vistra Corp. was founded in 1882 and is based in Irving, Texas.
Latest KEP
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Korea Electric Power Corporation
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Korea Electric Power Corporation
- Korea Electric Power Corp downgraded by Morgan Stanley
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Korea Electric Power Corporation
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Korea Electric Power Corporation
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Korea Electric Power Corporation
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Korea Electric Power Corporation
- Korea Electric Power Corporation Files 2025 Annual Report on Form 20-F
- SEC Form 20-F filed by Korea Electric Power Corporation
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Korea Electric Power Corporation
Latest VST
- SVP, Chief Accounting Officer Montemayor Margaret sold $824,800 worth of shares (5,000 units at $164.96), decreasing direct ownership by 26% to 14,360 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 144 filed by Vistra Corp.
- Director Sult John R was granted 1,268 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 77,214 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Pitesa John William was granted 1,268 shares, increasing direct ownership by 27% to 5,898 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Helm Scott B was granted 2,008 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.79% to 257,200 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Barbas Paul M was granted 1,268 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 53,494 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Crutchfield Lisa was granted 1,268 shares, increasing direct ownership by 4% to 34,618 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Baiera Gavin R. was granted 1,268 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 51,641 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Acosta Arcilia was granted 1,268 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 47,607 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ackermann Hilary E. was granted 1,268 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 68,852 units (SEC Form 4)