Compare · ES vs ETR
ES vs ETR
Side-by-side comparison of Eversource Energy (D/B/A) (ES) and Entergy Corporation (ETR): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both ES and ETR operate in Electric Utilities: Central (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- ETR is the larger of the two at $49.50B, about 1.9x ES ($25.61B).
- Over the past year, ES is up 3.7% and ETR is up 30.7% - ETR leads by 26.9 points.
- ETR has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 2 for ES).
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
Eversource Energy (D/B/A)
Eversource Energy, a public utility holding company, engages in the energy delivery business. The company operates through Electric Distribution, Electric Transmission, Natural Gas Distribution, and Water Distribution segments. It is involved in the transmission and distribution of electricity; solar power facilities; and distribution of natural gas. The company operates regulated water utilities that provide water services to approximately 216,000 customers. It serves residential, commercial, industrial, municipal and fire protection, and other customers in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. The company was formerly known as Northeast Utilities and changed its name to Eversource Energy in April 2015. Eversource Energy is based in Springfield, Massachusetts.
Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and distribution of electricity in the United States. The company generates electricity through gas/oil, nuclear, coal, hydro, and solar power sources. It operates in two segments, Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities. The company's Utility segment generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and distributes natural gas. Its Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment engages in the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States; sale of electric power to wholesale customers; provision of services to other nuclear power plant owners; and owning interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell electric power to wholesale customers. It sells energy to retail power providers, utilities, electric power co-operatives, power trading organizations, and other power generation companies. The company's power plants have approximately 30,000 megawatts (MW) of electric generating capacity, which include 8,000 MW of nuclear power. The company delivers electricity to 3.0 million utility customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Entergy Corporation was incorporated in 1949 and is based in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Latest ES
- Executive VP & General Counsel Butler Gregory B sold $489,160 worth of shares (7,000 units at $69.88), decreasing direct ownership by 11% to 56,179 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 4 filed by VP, Controller, Chief Acct Off Buth Jay S.
- Trustee Mudge W Robert bought $49,864 worth of shares (750 units at $66.48) (SEC Form 4)
- Eversource Energy Reports First Quarter 2026 Results
- Eversource Energy downgraded by Seaport Research Partners
- Eversource Energy Schedules First Quarter Earnings Call
- SEC Form DEFA14A filed by Eversource Energy (D/B/A)
- SEC Form DEF 14A filed by Eversource Energy (D/B/A)
- Eversource Statement on Proposed Final Decision to Approve Aquarion Sale
- Chairman of the Bd, Pres & CEO Nolan Joseph R Jr gifted 94,981 shares, decreasing direct ownership by 55% to 76,240 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest ETR
- "Officer" Under Sec. 16 Rules Fisackerly Haley exercised 10,638 shares at a strike of $52.69 and sold $1,170,180 worth of shares (10,638 units at $110.00) as part of a pre-agreed trading plan (SEC Form 4)
- New insider Stack Patrick J Jr claimed ownership of 15,280 shares (SEC Form 3)
- Director Ropp Ralph Lewis was granted 905 shares, increasing direct ownership by 60% to 2,423 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Puckett Karen A was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 34,223 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Levenick Stuart L was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 47,209 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hyland M Elise was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 19,426 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Frederickson Philip L was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 33,639 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ellis Brian W was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 8% to 14,453 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Donald Kirkland H was granted 858 shares, increasing direct ownership by 4% to 24,505 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Caldwell James Frank Jr was granted 722 shares, increasing direct ownership by 239% to 1,024 units (SEC Form 4)