Compare · ENJ vs XEL
ENJ vs XEL
Side-by-side comparison of Entergy New Orleans, LLC (ENJ) and Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- ENJ operates in Public Utilities, while XEL operates in Utilities - the two are in different parts of the market.
- XEL is the larger of the two at $48.46B, about 5.3x ENJ ($9.16B).
- Over the past year, ENJ is down 6.5% and XEL is up 13.5% - XEL leads by 20.0 points.
- XEL has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 1 for ENJ).
- XEL has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 0 for ENJ).
- Company
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC
- Xcel Energy Inc.
- Price
- $19.97+0.05%
- $77.62-1.77%
- Market cap
- $9.16B
- $48.46B
- 1M return
- -2.82%
- -3.49%
- 1Y return
- -6.51%
- +13.50%
- Industry
- Power Generation
- Power Generation
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NASDAQ
- IPO
- n/a
- News (4w)
- 1
- 14
- Recent ratings
- 0
- 25
Xcel Energy Inc.
Xcel Energy Inc., through its subsidiaries, generates, purchases, transmits, distributes, and sells electricity. It operates through Regulated Electric Utility, Regulated Natural Gas Utility, and All Other segments. The company generates electricity through coal, nuclear, natural gas, hydroelectric, solar, biomass, oil, wood/refuse, and wind energy sources. It also purchases, transports, distributes, and sells natural gas to retail customers, as well as transports customer-owned natural gas. In addition, the company develops and leases natural gas pipelines, and storage and compression facilities; and invests in rental housing projects, as well as procures equipment for the construction of renewable generation facilities. It serves residential, commercial, and industrial customers in the portions of Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin. The company sells electricity to approximately 3.7 million customers; and natural gas to approximately 2.1 million customers. Xcel Energy Inc. was incorporated in 1909 and is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Latest ENJ
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Entergy New Orleans, LLC
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC filed SEC Form 8-K: Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC filed SEC Form 8-K: Leadership Update
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC filed SEC Form 8-K: Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Other Events, Regulation FD Disclosure
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC filed SEC Form 8-K: Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Entergy New Orleans, LLC
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC filed SEC Form 8-K: Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC filed SEC Form 8-K: Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Entergy New Orleans, LLC filed SEC Form 8-K: Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation, Financial Statements and Exhibits
Latest XEL
- Xcel Energy Powering Communities, Economies as Energy Landscape Evolves
- PowerOn Midwest Economic Impact Report Highlights Billions in Benefits for Minnesota
- Xcel Energy Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
- Director Welsh Timothy A was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 15% to 17,018 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Kampling Patricia L was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 24,551 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Pardee Charles G was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 33,311 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Stockfish Devin W was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 41% to 7,798 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Johnson Netha N. was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 19,340 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hutchinson Maria Demaree was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 230% to 3,234 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Casey Lynn was granted 2,254 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 43,123 units (SEC Form 4)