Compare · CUBE vs O
CUBE vs O
Side-by-side comparison of CubeSmart (CUBE) and Realty Income Corporation (O): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both CUBE and O operate in Real Estate Investment Trusts (Real Estate), so they compete in similar markets.
- O is the larger of the two at $56.73B, about 6.2x CUBE ($9.13B).
- O has been more active in the news (13 items in the past 4 weeks vs 11 for CUBE).
- Both have 25 recent analyst ratings on file.
- Company
- CubeSmart
- Realty Income Corporation
- Price
- $40.31+0.85%
- $60.85+1.86%
- Market cap
- $9.13B
- $56.73B
- 1M return
- +0.07%
- -
- 1Y return
- -6.82%
- -
- Industry
- Real Estate Investment Trusts
- Real Estate Investment Trusts
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NYSE
- IPO
- News (4w)
- 11
- 13
- Recent ratings
- 25
- 25
CubeSmart
CubeSmart is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust. The Company's self-storage properties are designed to offer affordable, easily accessible and secure storage space for residential and commercial customers. According to the 2020 Self-Storage Almanac, CubeSmart is one of the top three owners and operators of self-storage properties in the United States.
Realty Income Corporation
Realty Income, The Monthly Dividend Company, is an S&P 500 company dedicated to providing stockholders with dependable monthly income. The company is structured as a REIT, and its monthly dividends are supported by the cash flow from over 6,500 real estate properties owned under long-term lease agreements with our commercial clients. To date, the company has declared 608 consecutive common stock monthly dividends throughout its 52-year operating history and increased the dividend 109 times since Realty Income's public listing in 1994 (NYSE: O). The company is a member of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats index. Additional information about the company can be obtained from the corporate website at www.realtyincome.com.
Latest CUBE
- Director Rogatz Jeffrey F was granted 4,044 units of Common, increasing direct ownership by 7% to 58,114 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Bussani Piero was granted 4,044 units of Common, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 68,966 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Connor Martin P. was granted 4,044 units of Common (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dowling Dororthy was granted 4,044 units of Common, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 34,598 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chin Jit Kee was granted 4,044 units of Common, increasing direct ownership by 42% to 13,682 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lynch Jair K was granted 4,044 units of Common, increasing direct ownership by 39% to 14,465 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Remondi John F was granted 4,044 units of Common, increasing direct ownership by 5% to 77,969 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Weber Jennie was granted 4,044 units of Common (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Weber Jennie
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Connor Martin P.
Latest O
- Jefferies resumed coverage on Realty Income with a new price target
- Realty Income to Present at Nareit's REITweek: 2026 Investor Conference
- Director Mclaughlin Gregory was granted 3,214 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Mckee Michael D was granted 3,214 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lopez Gerardo I was granted 3,214 shares, increasing direct ownership by 10% to 34,846 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Jacobson Jeff A was granted 3,214 shares, increasing direct ownership by 28% to 14,846 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Huskins Priya Cherian was granted 3,214 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Preusse Mary Hogan was granted 3,214 shares, increasing direct ownership by 17% to 22,425 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hourihan Kimberly was granted 3,214 shares, increasing direct ownership by 95% to 6,613 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gilyard Reginald Harold was granted 3,214 shares, increasing direct ownership by 42% to 10,847 units (SEC Form 4)