Compare · CIG vs ETR
CIG vs ETR
Side-by-side comparison of Comp En De Mn Cemig (CIG) and Entergy Corporation (ETR): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both CIG and ETR operate in Electric Utilities: Central (Utilities), so they compete in similar markets.
- ETR is the larger of the two at $50.71B, about 8.5x CIG ($5.98B).
- Over the past year, CIG is up 10.8% and ETR is up 30.8% - ETR leads by 20.0 points.
- ETR has been more active in the news (14 items in the past 4 weeks vs 4 for CIG).
- ETR has more recent analyst coverage (25 ratings vs 6 for CIG).
Comp En De Mn Cemig
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais, through its subsidiaries, engages in the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of energy in Brazil. As of December 31, 2020, the company operated 89 hydroelectric, wind, and solar plants with an installed capacity of 6,000 MW; 339,086 miles of distribution lines; and as of January 27, 2021, it operated 4,374 miles of transmission lines. It is also involved in the acquisition, transportation, and distribution of gas and its sub products and derivatives; provision of cloud solution, IT infrastructure, IT management, and cybersecurity services; provision of technology systems and systems for operational management of public service concessions; sale and trading of energy; provision of telecommunications services; and distributed generation, account services, cogeneration, energy efficiency, and supply and storage management activities. The company was incorporated in 1952 and is headquartered in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Entergy Corporation
Entergy Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and distribution of electricity in the United States. The company generates electricity through gas/oil, nuclear, coal, hydro, and solar power sources. It operates in two segments, Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities. The company's Utility segment generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and distributes natural gas. Its Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment engages in the ownership, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power plants located in the northern United States; sale of electric power to wholesale customers; provision of services to other nuclear power plant owners; and owning interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell electric power to wholesale customers. It sells energy to retail power providers, utilities, electric power co-operatives, power trading organizations, and other power generation companies. The company's power plants have approximately 30,000 megawatts (MW) of electric generating capacity, which include 8,000 MW of nuclear power. The company delivers electricity to 3.0 million utility customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. Entergy Corporation was incorporated in 1949 and is based in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Latest CIG
- New insider Peixoto Alexandre Ramos claimed ownership of 124 units of Preferred Shares (SEC Form 3)
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Lima Valeria Pires Amoroso
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Gama Da Silva Maria Do Socorro
- New insider Zimmermann Marcio Pereira claimed ownership of 25,000 units of Preferred Shares (SEC Form 3)
- Director Ferreira De Souza Aloisio Macario sold $3,860 worth of Preferred Stock (1,550 units at $2.49), decreasing direct ownership by 19% to 6,450 units (SEC Form 4)
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Comp En De Mn Cemig
- Cemig Files 2025 Form 20-F
- SEC Form 20-F filed by Comp En De Mn Cemig
- SEC Form 3 filed by new insider Silberman Marcus Leonardo
- SEC Form 6-K filed by Comp En De Mn Cemig
Latest ETR
- "Officer" Under Sec. 16 Rules Fisackerly Haley exercised 10,638 shares at a strike of $52.69 and sold $1,170,180 worth of shares (10,638 units at $110.00) as part of a pre-agreed trading plan (SEC Form 4)
- New insider Stack Patrick J Jr claimed ownership of 15,280 shares (SEC Form 3)
- Director Ropp Ralph Lewis was granted 905 shares, increasing direct ownership by 60% to 2,423 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Puckett Karen A was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 34,223 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Levenick Stuart L was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 2% to 47,209 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hyland M Elise was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 6% to 19,426 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Frederickson Philip L was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 3% to 33,639 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ellis Brian W was granted 1,079 shares, increasing direct ownership by 8% to 14,453 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Donald Kirkland H was granted 858 shares, increasing direct ownership by 4% to 24,505 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Caldwell James Frank Jr was granted 722 shares, increasing direct ownership by 239% to 1,024 units (SEC Form 4)