Compare · BBI vs EDSA
BBI vs EDSA
Side-by-side comparison of Brickell Biotech Inc. (BBI) and Edesa Biotech Inc. (EDSA): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both companies sit in the Health Care sector. BBI focuses on Biotechnology: Biological Products (No Diagnostic Substances), while EDSA focuses on Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations.
- EDSA is the larger of the two at $47.7M, about 2.0x BBI ($23.8M).
- EDSA has hit the wire 15 times in the past 4 weeks while BBI has been quiet.
- BBI has more recent analyst coverage (2 ratings vs 1 for EDSA).
- Company
- Brickell Biotech Inc.
- Edesa Biotech Inc.
- Price
- $2.31+2.90%
- $5.30-4.24%
- Market cap
- $23.8M
- $47.7M
- 1M return
- -
- -69.25%
- 1Y return
- -
- +189.89%
- Industry
- Biotechnology: Biological Products (No Diagnostic Substances)
- Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations
- Exchange
- NASDAQ
- NASDAQ
- IPO
- News (4w)
- 0
- 15
- Recent ratings
- 2
- 1
Brickell Biotech Inc.
Brickell Biotech, Inc., a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company, focuses on identifying, developing, and commercializing various prescription therapeutics for the treatment of debilitating skin diseases in the United States. The company's lead product candidate is sofpironium bromide that is in phase 3 clinical trial to treat patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis. It has a collaboration agreement with AnGes, Inc. for the development of a novel DNA vaccine candidate for COVID-19. The company was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in Boulder, Colorado.
Edesa Biotech Inc.
Edesa Biotech, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, engages in the research and development, manufacture, and commercialization of pharmaceutical products for inflammatory and immune-related diseases. Its lead product candidates are EB05, a monoclonal antibody, which is in Phase 2/Phase 3 clinical study for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome in covid-19 patients; and EB01, a topical cream containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compound that is in Phase 2B clinical study to treat chronic allergic contact dermatitis. The company also develops EB02, an extension of sPLA2 anti-inflammatory cream for treating erythema, swelling, and exudation associated with hemorrhoids disease; and EB06, a monoclonal antibody candidate. It has a collaboration agreement with NovImmune SA to develop products containing toll-like receptor 4 and chemokine ligand 10 for therapeutic, prophylactic, and diagnostic applications in humans and animals; and Yissum Research Development Company for the development of products for therapeutic, prophylactic, and diagnostic uses in topical dermal and anorectal applications, as well as for the use in dermatologic and gastrointestinal conditions. Edesa Biotech, Inc. was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Markham, Canada.
Latest BBI
- Spruce Point Capital Management Announces Investment Opinion: Releases Report and Strong Sell Research Opinion on Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: FND)
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by Brickell Biotech Inc.
- Brickell Biotech Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Brickell Biotech Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Leadership Update, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Fresh Tracks Therapeutics Initiates Multiple Ascending Dose Portion of Phase 1 Study of DYRK1A Inhibitor FRTX-02
- SEC Form EFFECT filed by Brickell Biotech Inc.
- Brickell Biotech Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Brickell Biotech's Return On Capital Employed Insights
- Brickell Biotech Announces Corporate Rebranding to Fresh Tracks Therapeutics
- SEC Form DEL AM filed by Brickell Biotech Inc.
Latest EDSA
- Edesa Biotech Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Other Events
- Edesa Biotech Reports Positive Exploratory Data for Paridiprubart in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
- Chief Executive Officer Nijhawan Pardeep was granted 1,671 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.23% to 731,134 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Marshall Patrick was granted 19,000 shares, increasing direct ownership by 36% to 71,666 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Macdonald Sean Arthur was granted 19,000 shares, increasing direct ownership by 86% to 41,054 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chypyha Joan was granted 19,000 shares, increasing direct ownership by 172% to 30,029 units (SEC Form 4)
- Chief Financial Officer Weiler Peter J. was granted 64,609 shares, increasing direct ownership by 99% to 129,609 units (SEC Form 4)
- President Brooks Michael J was granted 64,609 shares, increasing direct ownership by 28% to 291,479 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sistilli Carlo was granted 19,000 shares, increasing direct ownership by 62% to 49,417 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Olson Charles V was granted 19,000 shares, increasing direct ownership by 173% to 30,000 units (SEC Form 4)