Compare · BANL vs GEL
BANL vs GEL
Side-by-side comparison of CBL International Limited (BANL) and Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BANL and GEL operate in Oil Refining/Marketing (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- GEL is the larger of the two at $1.97B, about 68.9x BANL ($28.6M).
- BANL has been more active in the news (5 items in the past 4 weeks vs 4 for GEL).
- GEL has more recent analyst coverage (9 ratings vs 0 for BANL).
Genesis Energy, L.P.
Genesis Energy, L.P. operates in the midstream segment of the crude oil and natural gas industry. The company's Offshore Pipeline Transportation segment engages in offshore crude oil and natural gas pipeline transportation and handling operations; and in the deepwater pipeline servicing in the southern Keathley Canyon area of the Gulf of Mexico. This segment owns interests in approximately 1,422 miles of crude oil pipelines located offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Its Sodium Minerals and Sulfur Services segment offers sulfur-extraction services to refining operations; and operates storage and transportation assets. This segment provides services to ten refining operations; and sells sodium hydrosulfide and caustic soda to industrial and commercial companies involved in the mining of base metals. Its Onshore Facilities and Transportation segment offers onshore facilities and transportation services to Gulf Coast crude oil refineries and producers by purchasing, transporting, storing, blending, and marketing crude oil and refined products. It operates trucks, trailers, railcars, and terminals and tankage with 4.2 million barrels of storage capacity in various locations along the Gulf Coast. This segment also transports crude oil and carbon dioxide (CO2). It owns four onshore crude oil pipeline systems with approximately 450 miles of pipe in Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas; and four operational crude oil rail unloading facilities in Baton Rouge and Raceland, Louisiana, as well as Walnut Hill, Florida and Natchez, Mississippi. Its Marine Transportation segment offers waterborne transportation of petroleum and crude oil in North America. This segment owns a fleet of 91 barges with a combined transportation capacity of 3.2 million barrels; and 42 push/tow boats. In addition, the company produces natural soda ash. Genesis Energy, LLC serves as a general partner of the company. The company was incorporated in 1996 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Latest BANL
- CBL International Reports Strong 1H 2026 Results Highlighting Return to Profitability, Strong Volume Growth, Gross Profit More Than Doubled, and a Special Cash Dividend of $0.10 Per Share
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- CBL International Announces Regaining Compliance with Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement – Updated
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- CBL International Announces Regaining Compliance with Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- CBL International Announces 1-for-13 Reverse Share Split
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
Latest GEL
- Genesis Energy, L.P. to Participate in Citi’s 2026 Natural Resources Conference
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by Genesis Energy, L.P.
- Genesis Energy, L.P. filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Genesis Energy, L.P. Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results
- Genesis Energy, L.P. Declares Quarterly Distribution
- Director Albert Conrad P converted options into 2,500 units of Common Units - Class A and returned $36,925 worth of Common Units - Class A to the company (2,500 units at $14.77) (SEC Form 4)
- Director Taylor Jack T converted options into 2,575 units of Common Units - Class A and returned $38,033 worth of Common Units - Class A to the company (2,575 units at $14.77) (SEC Form 4)
- Director Davison James E. Jr. converted options into 2,388 units of Common Units - Class A and returned $35,271 worth of Common Units - Class A to the company (2,388 units at $14.77) (SEC Form 4)
- Director Jastrow Kenneth M Ii converted options into 2,649 units of Common Units - Class A and returned $39,126 worth of Common Units - Class A to the company (2,649 units at $14.77) (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gasaway Sharilyn S converted options into 2,500 units of Common Units - Class A and returned $36,925 worth of Common Units - Class A to the company (2,500 units at $14.77) (SEC Form 4)