Compare · BANL vs FIP
BANL vs FIP
Side-by-side comparison of CBL International Limited (BANL) and FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both BANL and FIP operate in Oil Refining/Marketing (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- FIP is the larger of the two at $445.5M, about 15.6x BANL ($28.6M).
- BANL has been more active in the news (5 items in the past 4 weeks vs 4 for FIP).
- FIP has more recent analyst coverage (4 ratings vs 0 for BANL).
Latest BANL
- CBL International Reports Strong 1H 2026 Results Highlighting Return to Profitability, Strong Volume Growth, Gross Profit More Than Doubled, and a Special Cash Dividend of $0.10 Per Share
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- CBL International Announces Regaining Compliance with Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement – Updated
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- CBL International Announces Regaining Compliance with Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- CBL International Announces 1-for-13 Reverse Share Split
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
- SEC Form 6-K filed by CBL International Limited
Latest FIP
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
- SEC Form 10-Q filed by FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
- FTAI Infrastructure Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- FTAI Infrastructure Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results, Declares Dividend of $0.03 per Share of Common Stock
- FTAI Infrastructure Inc. Announces Timing of Second Quarter 2026 Earnings and Conference Call
- Citizens resumed coverage on FTAI Infrastructure with a new price target
- SEC Form 4 filed by Director Lif Aiv 1, L.P.
- FTAI Infrastructure Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Director Robinson Ray M was granted 15,152 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 111,991 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hamilton James L. was granted 1,010 shares, increasing direct ownership by 12% to 9,410 units (SEC Form 4)