Compare · ARMK vs YUMC
ARMK vs YUMC
Side-by-side comparison of Aramark (ARMK) and Yum China Holdings Inc. (YUMC): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both ARMK and YUMC operate in Restaurants (Consumer Discretionary), so they compete in similar markets.
- YUMC is the larger of the two at $15.06B, about 1.1x ARMK ($14.04B).
- Over the past year, ARMK is up 35.3% and YUMC is down 3.1% - ARMK leads by 38.3 points.
- ARMK has been more active in the news (23 items in the past 4 weeks vs 13 for YUMC).
- ARMK has more recent analyst coverage (23 ratings vs 10 for YUMC).
- Company
- Aramark
- Yum China Holdings Inc.
- Price
- $53.44+0.14%
- $42.88+0.06%
- Market cap
- $14.04B
- $15.06B
- 1M return
- +16.78%
- -11.98%
- 1Y return
- +35.26%
- -3.09%
- Industry
- Restaurants
- Restaurants
- Exchange
- NYSE
- NYSE
- IPO
- 2013
- 2016
- News (4w)
- 23
- 13
- Recent ratings
- 23
- 10
Aramark
Aramark provides food, facilities, and uniform services to education, healthcare, business and industry, sports, leisure, and corrections clients in the United States and internationally. It operates through three segments: Food and Support Services United States, Food and Support Services International, and Uniform and Career Apparel. The company offers managed services, including dining, catering, food service management, and convenience-oriented retail services; non-clinical support services, such as patient food and nutrition, retail food, and procurement services; and plant operations and maintenance, custodial/housekeeping, energy management, grounds keeping, and capital project management services. It also provides on-site restaurants, catering, convenience stores, and executive dining services; beverage and vending services; and facility management services comprising landscaping, transportation, payment, and other facility consulting services relating to building operations. In addition, the company offers concessions, banquet, and catering services; retail services and merchandise sale, recreational, and lodging services; and facility management services at sports, entertainment, and recreational facilities. Further, the company offers correctional food; and operates commissaries, laundry facilities, and property rooms. Additionally, it provides design, sourcing and manufacturing, delivery, cleaning, maintenance, and marketing services for uniforms and accessories; provides managed restroom services; and rents uniforms, work clothing, outerwear, particulate-free garments, and non-garment items and related services that include mats, shop towels, and first aid supplies. The company was formerly known as ARAMARK Holdings Corporation and changed its name to Aramark in May 2014. Aramark was founded in 1959 and is based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yum China Holdings Inc.
Yum China Holdings, Inc. owns, operates, and franchises restaurants in China. The company operates through two segments, KFC and Pizza Hut. It operates restaurants under the KFC, Pizza Hut, Little Sheep, Huang Ji Huang, COFFii & JOY, East Dawning, Taco Bell, and Lavazza brands, which specialize in chicken, pizza, hot pot cooking, Chinese food, Mexican-style food, specialty coffee, simmer pot, and Italian coffee categories. The company also provides online food delivery services. In addition, it operates franchise restaurants under the KFC, Pizza Hut, Huang Ji Huang, Taco Bell, Little Sheep, East Dawning, Lavazza, and COFFii & JOY names. As of June 30, 2021, the company operated 11,023 restaurants in approximately 1,500 cities. Yum China Holdings, Inc. was incorporated in 2016 and is headquartered in Shanghai, China.
Latest ARMK
- Director Wills Kevin was granted 37 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.17% to 21,940 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Sadove Stephen I was granted 199 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.19% to 102,507 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lopez Patricia E was granted 65 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 29,142 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director King Karen Marie was granted 26 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.06% to 42,803 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Keverian Kenneth M was granted 65 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 29,142 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Heller Bridgette P was granted 80 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 35,821 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Dreiling Richard W was granted 32 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 14,534 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Creed Greg was granted 151 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 67,506 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Cameron Susan M. was granted 108 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 48,334 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Delghiaccio Brian M was granted 37 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.22% to 16,386 units (SEC Form 4)
Latest YUMC
- Director Yang William Wang was granted 7,632 shares, increasing direct ownership by 13% to 64,852 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hu Fred was granted 13,050 shares, increasing direct ownership by 16% to 95,455 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Durham Mikel A. was granted 8,447 shares, increasing direct ownership by 93% to 17,572 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Shao Zili was granted 4,544 shares, increasing direct ownership by 9% to 56,551 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ettedgui Edouard was granted 8,098 shares, increasing direct ownership by 14% to 67,324 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Zhu Christina (Xiaojing) was granted 7,573 shares, increasing direct ownership by 43% to 25,215 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Zhang Min (Jenny) was granted 3,063 shares (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hoffmann David L was granted 4,602 shares, increasing direct ownership by 20% to 27,336 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Lu Ruby Rong was granted 7,865 shares, increasing direct ownership by 12% to 73,935 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Ge Grace Xin was granted 4,602 shares, increasing direct ownership by 102% to 9,126 units (SEC Form 4)