Compare · AMR vs BTU
AMR vs BTU
Side-by-side comparison of Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc. (AMR) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU): market cap, price performance, sector, and recent activity on the wire.
Summary
- Both AMR and BTU operate in Coal Mining (Energy), so they compete in similar markets.
- BTU is the larger of the two at $2.93B, about 1.4x AMR ($2.15B).
- BTU has hit the wire 2 times in the past 4 weeks while AMR has been quiet.
- BTU has more recent analyst coverage (8 ratings vs 6 for AMR).
Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc.
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. operates as a mining company. It produces, processes, and sells met coal and thermal coal in Virginia and West Virginia. It operates through two segments, Met and CAPP-Thermal. The Met segments operates five active mines and two preparation plants in Virginia; and seventeen active mines and five preparation plants in West Virginia. The CAPP - Thermal segments operates one active mine and one preparation plant in West Virginia. The company was formerly known as Contura Energy, Inc. and changed its name to Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. in February 2021. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. was incorporated in 2016 and is based in Bristol, Tennessee.
Peabody Energy Corporation
Peabody Energy Corporation engages in coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, China, India, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company operates through Seaborne Thermal Mining, Seaborne Metallurgical Mining, Powder River Basin Mining, and Other U.S. Thermal Mining segments. It is involved in mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal primarily to electric utilities; mining bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits; and mining metallurgical coal, such as hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal injection coal. The company supplies coal primarily to electricity generators, industrial facilities, and steel manufacturers. As of December 31, 2020, it owned interests in 17 coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia; and had approximately 3.0 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 450,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The company also engages in direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts, as well as provides transportation-related services, which involve financial derivative contracts and physical contracts. Peabody Energy Corporation was founded in 1883 and is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
Latest AMR
- SEC Form SD filed by Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc.
- Director Courtis Kenneth S. bought $2,258,289 worth of shares (10,000 units at $225.83), increasing direct ownership by 0.98% to 1,035,394 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Courtis Kenneth S. bought $1,144,927 worth of shares (5,000 units at $228.99), increasing direct ownership by 0.49% to 1,025,394 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Courtis Kenneth S. bought $1,082,664 worth of shares (5,000 units at $216.53), increasing direct ownership by 0.49% to 1,020,394 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gorzynski Michael bought $2,089,169 worth of shares (10,000 units at $208.92) (SEC Form 4)
- Director Courtis Kenneth S. bought $3,157,631 worth of shares (15,000 units at $210.51), increasing direct ownership by 1% to 1,015,394 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Courtis Kenneth S. bought $2,902,552 worth of shares (15,000 units at $193.50), increasing direct ownership by 2% to 1,000,394 units (SEC Form 4)
- Amendment: SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G/A filed by Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc.
- SEC Form SCHEDULE 13G filed by Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc.
- Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc. filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
Latest BTU
- SEC Form 8-K filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- SEC Form SD filed by Peabody Energy Corporation
- Peabody Announces Full Redemption of 3.250% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
- Peabody Energy Corporation filed SEC Form 8-K: Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
- Director Champion William H was granted 101 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.23% to 43,304 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Malone Robert A was granted 52 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 58,692 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Walker Clayton D. was granted 23 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.29% to 7,927 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Gorman Stephen E was granted 51 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.09% to 57,720 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Hodges Georganne was granted 22 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.27% to 8,064 units (SEC Form 4)
- Director Chirekos Nicholas J. was granted 53 shares, increasing direct ownership by 0.12% to 44,672 units (SEC Form 4)